Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSSNJ

1,255 results

3.40s

  • Shapiro v. Board of Education

    3 N.J. Misc. 406 · Commissioner of Education, N.J. · Apr 7, 1925

    The decisions of tins department, as. well as those of the *407 supreme court, notably that of Davis v. … “if a board of education shall not have made rules, and regulations as aforesaid, then no contract between such board of education and a teacher shall be valid'undess the same be in writing * * * in triplicate, signed by

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Salem v. Salem County Board

    1 N.J. Tax 462 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 29, 1980

    County Boards of Taxation are mandated by the legislature to complete their annual Equalization Tables by March 10th. N.J. S.A. 54:3-18. … Middlesex County Board of Taxation, 113 N.J.Super. 6, 10 , 272 A.2d 542 (App.Div. 1971); Delaware Twp. v. Neeld, 52 N.J.Super. 63, 68 , 144 A.2d 801 (App.Div. 1958).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Young v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

    5 N.J. Tax 102 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 30, 1982

    [at 103, 130 A.2d 847 ; citations omitted] *108 The doctrine of merger, in terms of planning and zoning, was clearly enunciated by our Supreme Court in Loechner v. … See Hackensack Water Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Howell Township v. Monmouth County Board of Taxation

    18 N.J. Tax 149 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 19, 1999

    The municipality timely filed a complaint against the county board with the Tax Court. The court subsequently granted the developer’s motion to intervene, as the developer is the proper defendant, not the county board. … Maxwell Co. v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Kurtz v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

    4 N.J. Tax 343 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 5, 1982

    The memorandum of judgment issued by the county board and forwarded to plaintiffs’ attorney (a copy of which is attached to the complaint), is entitled “Joan Kurtz, Petitioner v. Mansfield Township, Respondent.” … N.J.S.A. 54:3-26; 3 Danis v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 113 N.J.Super. 6, 9 , 272 A.2d 542 (App.Div.1971).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Urso & Brown, Inc. v. Director, New Jersey Division of Taxation

    19 N.J. Tax 246 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 4, 2001

    Plaintiff, Urso & Brown, Inc., predecessor to Al Gar/The Display Connection, Inc., sells custom-designed point-of-sale merchandise displays to retailers. … See also In re Modem Refractories Service Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cranbury Township v. Middlesex County Board of Taxation

    6 N.J. Tax 501 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 13, 1984

    The first issue therefore is whether the county board should have included the sale in question- in its sales-ratio study even though the sale constituted a split-off. In Kearny v. … In Union Tp. v. Taxation Div.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Town of Morristown v. Morris County Board of Taxation

    New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 25, 2024

    Willingboro Twp. v. Burlington County Board, 62 N.J. 203, 222 (1973). … Cashin v. Bello, 223 N.J. 328, 335 (2015) (quoting O’Connell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hainesport Township. v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

    25 N.J. Tax 138 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 15, 2009

    See, e.g., Johnson v. … Greek & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Washington Township v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

    7 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 7, 1984

    Where a county board has utilized the director’s school aid table and applied it uniformly a presumption of validity attaches to a county board’s determination in its adoption of an equalization table. Kearney v. … In Secaucus v. Taxation Div.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Titan Sports, Inc. v. State Athletic Control Board

    11 N.J. Tax 259 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 17, 1990

    The board distinguishes cases granting First Amendment protection to other forms of entertainment, e.g., Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. … The board denies that New Jersey lacks substantial nexus with the interstate communications and relies on Goldberg v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Township of Jefferson v. Morris County Board of Taxation

    26 N.J. Tax 129 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 8, 2011

    See Town of Secaucus v. … Jefferson relies on Abe Schrader Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Titan Sports, Inc. v. State Athletic Control Board

    12 N.J. Tax 214 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 14, 1992

    Titan Sports v. Athletic Control Board, 11 N.J.Tax 259 (Tax Ct.1990). Two issues of material fact remained with regard to the First Amendment and the Commerce Clause. … Thus, the decision in Leathers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gale Builders, Inc. v. Hunterdon County Board of Taxation

    8 N.J. Tax 16 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 13, 1985

    Terhune v. … Stores v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Vicari v. Bethlehem Township & Hunterdon County Board of Taxation

    8 N.J. Tax 513 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 2, 1986

    King v. Ruckman, 22 N.J.Eq. 551 (E. & A.1871); Locher v. Locher, supra. It was stated in King v. … In Stone v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mount Laurel Township v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

    25 N.J. Tax 319 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 15, 2009

    In Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, supra, 23 N.J.Tax at 469-70 , the court concluded that the principles enunciated by our Supreme Court in City of Newark v. … See, e.g., Essex County Bd. of Taxation v. City of Newark, 73 N.J. 69, 72 , 372 A.2d 607 (1977); Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of Edgewater, 68 N.J. 405, 411 , 346 A.2d 396 (1975); City of Passaic v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

    23 N.J. Tax 466 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 1, 2007

    The authority of a county board of taxation to order a revaluation was recognized in Bergen County Board of Taxation v. … Quoting from this Court’s earlier opinion in Flanagan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Borough of Roseland v. Essex County Board

    18 N.J. Misc. 613 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 22, 1940

    See, for example, Borough of Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1909), 78 N. J. L. 439; 74 Atl. … Mickle v. Matlack (Supreme Court, 1839), 17 N. J. L. 86; Smith v. Minor (Supreme Court, 1790), 1 Id. 16; Waldron v. Rowe (Supreme Court, 1917), 91 Id. 71; 106 Atl. Rep. 212 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Secondary School Admissions Test Board, Inc. v. Princeton Borough

    13 N.J. Tax 467 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 20, 1993

    Paper Mill Playhouse v. … See Weymouth Tp. v. Memorial Pk. Family Prac. Ctr., Inc., 7 N.J.Tax 589, 592-95 (Tax 1985) and New Brunswick v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Atlantic City v. Atlantic County Board of Taxation

    2 N.J. Tax 30 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 24, 1980

    In a challenge to an equalization table the ordinary presumption of validity which accompanies a determination by a county tax board applies. Kearny v. Div. of Tax App., 35 N.J. 299, 305 , 173 A.2d 8 (1961). … Kingsley v. Div. of Tax App., 40 N.J. 338 , 192 A.2d 561 (1963); Kearny v. Div. of Tax App., supra; East Windsor Tp. v. Div. of Tax App., 89 N.J.Super. 282 , 214 A.2d 708 (App.Div.1965). In Willingboro Tp. *39 v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.