Case law

Dillon-Stout v. North Carolina Psychology Bd.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 4, 2004

Mabrey v. Smith , 144 N.C. App. 119 , 548 S.E.2d 183 (2001). … See Collins v. North Carolina Parole Com'n , 344 N.C. 179 , 473 S.E.2d 1 (1996); Mazzucco v. North Carolina Bd. of Medical Examiners , 31 N.C.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1953

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: CAN THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOUCES BOARD BE AUTHORIZED TO EXPEND PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CEMETERY OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE OLD BOGGY DEPOT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** SALESMAN — EMPLOYMENT — PUBLIC FUNDS ** THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD HAS AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY SALESMEN TO SELL " TRAVEL POSTER STAMPS " IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE TERMS STATED.

Opinion No. 51-0828

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** CENTRAL PURCHASING — BIDS ** IS THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD REQUIRED BY LAW TO PURCHASE NECESSARY SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, ETC., INCLUDING PRINTING, THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS ?

Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1952

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED … THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [ 74-351 ] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1955

INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATION PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 OF THE 24TH OKLAHOMA LEG AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDED THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

Fears v. State

2010 Ohio 3752 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 28, 2010

Plaintiff v. … Brown Isabella D. Thomas Peter E. DeMarco 1058 Mt.

Winters v. First Union Corp.

2001 NCBC 08 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 13, 2001

Sutter v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E.2d 161 (1970). … HAJMM Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, 94 N.C.

McKnight v. New Hanover B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 7, 2003

New Hanover County Board of Education was self-insured with North Carolina School Board Insurance Trust as the Servicing Agent. 4. … Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 (1980). 4.

Mottram v. Heyer

5 Denio 629 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1846

This is also iri accordance with the decision of the court of sessions in Scotland, in the case of Strachan v. The Trustees of Knox Co. referred to by Brown, (Brown on Sales, 536.) … gbods oil board, to tlie exclusion tif the bwnefs.

In re Mehn's Estate

124 N.Y.S. 173 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 12, 1910

Supp. 708 ; Crawford v. Nassoy, 173 N. Y. 163 , 65 N. E. 962 . … Policy, following the decision of Baucus v.

Opinion No. 71-338 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1971

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 . It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the affirmative.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 1996

E.g., Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972); and Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). ¶ 12 As the United States Supreme Court held in Board of Regents v. … Id. ¶ 23 Relying on a decision of the Alabama Supreme Court, Brown's Ferry Waste Disposal Center v.

Price v. Department of Revenue

7 Or. Tax 18 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 24, 1977

Brown, Esq., of Lake Oswego, a professor of law at Northwestern School of Law, Portland, appeared as amicus curiae in respect to the constitutional issue. … See Pacific Building v. Commission, 2 OTR 52 (1965); Lundeen v. Commission, 2 OTR 13 (1964).

In re Smith

712 A.2d 849 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1998

See also Commonwealth v. Brown, 346 Pa. 192 , 29 A.2d 793 (1943); Commonwealth v. Buzak, 197 Pa.Super. 514 , 179 A.2d 248 (1962); Commonwealth v. Litman, 187 Pa.Super. 537 , 144 A.2d 592 (1958). … This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the Petition for Relief of the Judicial Conduct Board pursuant to Art. V, § 18(d)(2) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 2.

In Re Quintiles Transnational Corp. S'holders Litig.

2003 NCBC 11 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 19, 2003

Brown, and William L. Roper. … Parsons v.

Opinion No. 68-218 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1968

The Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the State Board for Vocational Education, or of the State Board of Education, including all personnel thereof and all property and assets belonging to such Division, is hereby … Parks v. Smith, 204 Okl. 625 , 232 P.2d 614 ; Brown v. Manker, Okl., 410 P.2d 61 .

Rhea, Peter v. Titan Transfer, Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 11, 2023

Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge Pele I. Godkin and Judge Meredith B. Weaver joined. J. Allen Brown, Nashville, Tennessee, for the employer-appellant, Titan Transfer, Inc. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Colhoun v. Jones

2 Redf. 34 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1870

(Peck v. Cary, 27 N.Y., 9 ; Clark v. Fisher, 1 Paige, 171 .) … Gray and Brown, who concur with the most enlightened and able medical writers on the subject. Dr.

Wigwam Holdings LLC v. Madison County Assessor

115 N.E.3d 531 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 14, 2018

This is consistent with the Indiana Board’s statutory duty, as the finder of fact, to “review the probative value of an appraisal report.” See IND. CODE § 6-1.1-15-4(p) (2018). See also Stinson v. … See, e.g., McKeeman v. Steuben Cty. Assessor, 10 N.E.3d 612, 614 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2014). Merely challenging the Assessor’s methodology will not suffice. See, e.g., Gillette v. Brown Cty.