Case law

Opinion No. 51-0828

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** CENTRAL PURCHASING — BIDS ** IS THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD REQUIRED BY LAW TO PURCHASE NECESSARY SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, ETC., INCLUDING PRINTING, THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS ?

Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1952

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED … THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [ 74-351 ] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1955

INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATION PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 OF THE 24TH OKLAHOMA LEG AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDED THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1953

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: CAN THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOUCES BOARD BE AUTHORIZED TO EXPEND PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CEMETERY OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE OLD BOGGY DEPOT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** SALESMAN — EMPLOYMENT — PUBLIC FUNDS ** THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD HAS AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY SALESMEN TO SELL " TRAVEL POSTER STAMPS " IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE TERMS STATED.

Silas, Verna v. Brock Services

2015 TN WC App. 35 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 2, 2015

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Vema Silas ) Docket No. 2014-02-0013 ) v. … Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903-04 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citations omitted).

Opinion No. 55-1118

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD CAN LEGALLY PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING IN A STATE PARK, TO BE OWNED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, FOR USE AS A CHAPEL BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT REGARD THE

Opinion No. 55-0520

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1955

OPINION — AG — 74 O.S.H. 351(L), THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO GRANT TO THE CONCESSIONAIRE OPERATING ONE OF THE STATE PARKS UNDER CONTROL OF SAID BOARD A LEASE PORTION OF THE LAND

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 1989

PERRY V. SINDERMANN, 408 U.S. 593 (1970); AND BOARD OF REGENTS V. ROTH, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). … BROWN V. REARDON, 770 F.2D 896, 904-905 (10TH CIR. 1985). THE U.S.

Opinion No. 53-0821

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1953

OPINION — AG — THE LANGUAGE OF 74 O.S. 356 .6 [ 74-356.6 ] (BONDS SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) SHALL BE AT A PERCENTAGE RATE) MAY LEGALLY SELL THE PARK IMPROVEMENT BONDS REFERRED

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 1957

OPINION — AG — ** TOURIST — EXPENSES — FACILITIES ** (1) A CONTRACT SUCH AS THAT DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THIS LETTER IS WITHIN THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD; AND THAT SUCH A … CONTRACT WOULD BE PROPERLY CHARGEABLE AGAINST AN UNENCUMBERED BALANCE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED TO THE APPROPRIATION HEREINABOVE MENTIONED, OR AGAINST FUNDS CONTRIBUTED TO THE BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADVERTISING AND PUBLICIZING

Opinion No. 52-1023

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 1952

Opinion No. 55-0709

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1955

AG HAS UNDER CONSIDERATION THE PROPOSED CONTRACT BETWEEN THE MARMON ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, A COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION OF HOLLIS, OKLAHOMA AND THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 1956

MODIFICATION — LEASE — CONTRACT ** OPINION DEALING WITH: MODIFICATION OF ITS LEASE COVERING THE LODGE AND CABINS AND CERTAIN OTHER CONCESSIONS AT SEQUOYAH STATE PARK, AND IN WHICH LETTER NEEDED AN OPINION TO WHAT AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD … (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) TO ENTER INTO SUCH AN AGREEMENT.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR MENTIONED IN SAID ACT (SENATE BILL NO. 369 — APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) HAVING EXPIRED. . . … THAT OBLIGATIONS MAY BE INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDE THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1955

OPINION — AG — SAID CLAUSE NO. 13 DOES NOT AUTHORIZE YOUR BOARD (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) TO GRANT SAID BOAT CONCESSION TO MR. … , IN WHICH EVENT YOUR BOARD WOULD HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY AND SAID LEASE AGREEMENT WOULD NOT BE VIOLATED.

Dillon-Stout v. North Carolina Psychology Bd.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 4, 2004

Mabrey v. Smith , 144 N.C. App. 119 , 548 S.E.2d 183 (2001). … See Collins v. North Carolina Parole Com'n , 344 N.C. 179 , 473 S.E.2d 1 (1996); Mazzucco v. North Carolina Bd. of Medical Examiners , 31 N.C.

McKnight v. New Hanover B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 7, 2003

New Hanover County Board of Education was self-insured with North Carolina School Board Insurance Trust as the Servicing Agent. 4. … Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 (1980). 4.

Fears v. State

2010 Ohio 3752 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 28, 2010

Plaintiff v. … Brown Isabella D. Thomas Peter E. DeMarco 1058 Mt.

Castelli v. Department of Professional Regulation

33 Fla. Supp. 2d 191 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Jan 22, 1989

That language is specifically set forth in the Board’s Order. … Second, she was advised prior to the November 22, 1986 Board meeting that the Board was concerned about the events surrounding her transmittal to the Board of Petitioner Castelli’s application.