Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.44s
Gibbons v. Umatilla County People's Utility District
9 Or. Tax 176 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 29, 1982
(See Brown v. Portland School Dist. No. 1, 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981).) No definitions of this term have been found in the Oregon case law but this is an old problem. … In Stasher v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKing Industrial Corp. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners
741 N.E.2d 815 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 22, 2000
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 15, 1998, this Court remanded this case to the State Board to determine whether a kit building adjustment should be applied. See King Indus. v. … ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Freudenberg-NOK Gen. P’ship v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 1968
Kommers v. Palagi, 111 Mont. 293 , 108 P.2d 208 . … Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 2009
See Food Drug Admin. v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 529 U.S. 120 , 143 (2000). … See Food Drug Admin. v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 529 U.S. 120 , 143 (2000). 7.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.
263 S.W. 249 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 28, 1924
Brown, county judge of Tarrant county, R. E. Duringer, H. R. Wall, Olin Gibbins and R. … Co. v. Smith County et al., 54 Tex. 1 . “The expressed intention of the law is to make the decisions of the board of equalization final on the question of valuation.” In the case of T. & P. Ry. Co. v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedIrwin Mortgage Corp. v. Indiana Board of Tax Review
775 N.E.2d 720 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 30, 2002
As stated in Whetzel v. Department of Local Government Finance, the State Board was a creation of the Legislature and therefore only had those powers conferred by statute. Whetzel v. … See Whetzel v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 1980
10 of Chapter 75 , O.S.L. 1977, which repeals all laws or parts of laws in conflict with the amended act, with certain exceptions, is a general repealer provision, the effect of which is stated in Standard Company Dairy v. … Wade v. Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526 (1973); Guardianship of Cambell, Okl., 450 P.2d 203 (1966) .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBland v. Gellman, Brydges & Schroff
69 N.Y.S.3d 233 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textIzaak Walton League of America v. Lake County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals
881 N.E.2d 737 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 4, 2008
STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Endowment Corp. v. Lake County Prop. … The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003).
Cited 8 timesPublished73 N.Y.S.3d 791 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Mar 29, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textSyndicate Building Corp. v. City University of New York
151 Misc. 2d 492 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1991
(See, e.g., Wolff v State of New York, 137 AD2d 684 ; Brown v State of New York, 125 AD2d 750 , lv dismissed 70 NY2d 747 ; Sperry v State of New York, 50 AD2d 618 , affd 40 NY2d 997 .) … acting for and in behalf of such board of trustees”.
Cited 4 timesPublishedVaughn v. Hertford County B.O.E.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 19, 2001
School Board Association as the servicing agent. 3. The employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all relevant times. 4.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpence v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Agric. & Mkts.
32 N.Y.3d 991 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Sep 18, 2018
In Janus v. … Kulzer from running for school board, water commissioner or dog catcher.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 1978
See: McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. Cuzalina, Okl. Cr., 520 P.2d 656 (1974); Wade v. Brown, Okl. Cr., 516 P.2d 526 (1973); Gulf Oil Co. v. Woodsen, Okl. Cr., 505 P.2d 484 (1972); Perry v. … See Atchley v. State, Okl.
Cited 0 timesPublished608 A.2d 112 · Delaware Family Court · Oct 10, 1990
Travers Brown, was the biological father of Leah Caroline Brown, born January 27, 1987, to Elaine Taxiera. … Brown’s sister, Betty Brown, who actually resided with Levi Brown in April and May of 1986. Based upon the substantiation of Ms. Taxiera’s testimony by Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublished167 Misc. 2d 441 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Sep 20, 1995
Defendant argues that while there is no statutory formula for an attestation, "the fundamental language of comparison and accuracy” must be included pursuant to People v Brown ( 128 Misc 2d 149, 154 [Madison County Ct 1985 … Not only was there no comparison of the copy to the original data for this defendant, worse still, there was an attestation and certification that is, to use the term employed in People v Brown (supra), "meaningless.”
Cited 1 timesPublished2019 TN WC 96 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 27, 2019
Hardy's coworkers, Angela Woods and Danyiel Brown, testified by affidavit regarding their exposure to chemicals, mold, and asbestos at Hershey. Ms. Brown further observed Ms. … Johnson v. Pilgrim's Pride, Inc., et al., 2017 TN Wrk Comp App Bd LEXIS 18, at *3-4 (Feb. 13, 2017) (internal citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 13, 2008
Saums v. Raleigh Community Hospital , 346 N.C. 760 , 487 S.E.2d 746 (1997), citing Kennedy v. Duke Univ. Med. Center , 101 N.C. App. 24 , 398 S.E.2d 677 (1990). … Sparks v. Mountain Breeze Restaurant , 55 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished2017 TN WC 105 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 2, 2017
Thus, as noted by the Appeals Board, it is "critical" that "an employment relationship exist[ ed] at the time of injury." Duck v. Cox Oil Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 2, at* 13 (Jan. 21, 2016). … In Black v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna