Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.35s
65 Misc. 2d 15 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 29, 1971
(Javins v. First Nat. Realty Corp., supra; Lemle v. Breedan, 462 P. 2d 470 [Hawaii, 1969]; Reste Realty Corp. v. Cooper, 53 N. J. 444; Marini v. Ireland, 56 N. J. 130; Brown v. Southall Realty Co., 237 Atl. 2d 834 [C. … Academy Spires v. Brown, 111 N. J. Super. 477).
Cited 28 timesPublished28 Misc. 2d 642 · New York Family Court · Feb 1, 1961
Div. 31 ; Bracy v. … Stuart v. Chandler, 123 Misc. 201 ; Fite v. Miller, 280 App. Div. 12 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished142 Misc. 2d 129 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1988
(See generally, Perone v Nicklas, 99 AD2d 484, 486 .) … (Levy v State of New York, 100 Misc 2d 781, 782-783 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished2 Va. 351 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1823
Brown, James Roach, and William M’Bee, entered into a recognisance to the Governor, conditioned *for the said Brown’s keeping the peace, and being of good behavior towards all the citizens of this Commonwealth, and particularly … Brown had broken the condition of the said recognizance, and that for this reason it was rightfully quashed. This decision renders it unnecessary to consider the other points adjourned.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 Va. 351 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1823
Brown, James Roach, and William M’Bee, entered into a recognisance to the Governor, conditioned *for the said Brown’s keeping the peace, and being of good behavior towards all the citizens of this Commonwealth, and particularly … Brown had broken the condition of the said recognizance, and that for this reason it was rightfully quashed. This decision renders it unnecessary to consider the other points adjourned.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 22 · Saratoga Chancery Court · May 7, 1844
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 155 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Jul 1, 1799
This the Court of Errors held sufficient to put the plaintiff upon the explanatory proof indicated by the decision, before the deed could be read to the jury, iff In Northrop v. … Wright, 7 Hill, 476 , in error, Chancellor Walworth denies the foregoing case of Kimball v. Brown to fie law, except in cases precisely similar.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 Va. 516 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1826
, with pistols loaded with powder and bullets of lead, and that he the said Brown, a certain challenge, in the name of the said Brown, in the form of a letter, to the said Rust directed, did then and there wickedly write, … To maintain this position, the Case of The King v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 Va. 516 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1826
, with pistols loaded with powder and bullets of lead, and that he the said Brown, a certain challenge, in the name of the said Brown, in the form of a letter, to the said Rust directed, did then and there wickedly write, … To maintain this position, the Case of The King v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 Va. 516 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1826
, with pistols loaded with powder and bullets of lead, and that he the said Brown, a certain challenge, in the name of the said Brown, in the form of a letter, to the said Rust directed, did then and there wickedly write, … To maintain this position, the Case of The King v.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 White & W. 755 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 1, 1883
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 77 · Saratoga Chancery Court · Oct 19, 1841
Cited 0 timesPublished228 S.W. 1087 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 30, 1921
V. Brown, filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, basing his motion upon the ground that the judgment had been compromised and settled and a release executed by him.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna