Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.35s

  • Amanuensis, Ltd. v. Brown

    65 Misc. 2d 15 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 29, 1971

    (Javins v. First Nat. Realty Corp., supra; Lemle v. Breedan, 462 P. 2d 470 [Hawaii, 1969]; Reste Realty Corp. v. Cooper, 53 N. J. 444; Marini v. Ireland, 56 N. J. 130; Brown v. Southall Realty Co., 237 Atl. 2d 834 [C. … Academy Spires v. Brown, 111 N. J. Super. 477).

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Brown

    28 Misc. 2d 642 · New York Family Court · Feb 1, 1961

    Div. 31 ; Bracy v. … Stuart v. Chandler, 123 Misc. 201 ; Fite v. Miller, 280 App. Div. 12 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    142 Misc. 2d 129 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1988

    (See generally, Perone v Nicklas, 99 AD2d 484, 486 .) … (Levy v State of New York, 100 Misc 2d 781, 782-783 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    11 Va. 745 · General Court of Virginia · Dec 15, 1841

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Randolph v. Brown

    2 Va. 351 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1823

    Brown, James Roach, and William M’Bee, entered into a recognisance to the Governor, conditioned *for the said Brown’s keeping the peace, and being of good behavior towards all the citizens of this Commonwealth, and particularly … Brown had broken the condition of the said recognizance, and that for this reason it was rightfully quashed. This decision renders it unnecessary to consider the other points adjourned.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Randolph v. Brown

    2 Va. 351 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1823

    Brown, James Roach, and William M’Bee, entered into a recognisance to the Governor, conditioned *for the said Brown’s keeping the peace, and being of good behavior towards all the citizens of this Commonwealth, and particularly … Brown had broken the condition of the said recognizance, and that for this reason it was rightfully quashed. This decision renders it unnecessary to consider the other points adjourned.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    11 Va. 711 · General Court of Virginia · Dec 15, 1841

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cheesebrough

    4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 22 · Saratoga Chancery Court · May 7, 1844

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kimball v. Brown

    1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 155 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Jul 1, 1799

    This the Court of Errors held sufficient to put the plaintiff upon the explanatory proof indicated by the decision, before the deed could be read to the jury, iff In Northrop v. … Wright, 7 Hill, 476 , in error, Chancellor Walworth denies the foregoing case of Kimball v. Brown to fie law, except in cases precisely similar.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    2 Va. 516 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1826

    , with pistols loaded with powder and bullets of lead, and that he the said Brown, a certain challenge, in the name of the said Brown, in the form of a letter, to the said Rust directed, did then and there wickedly write, … To maintain this position, the Case of The King v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Brown

    1 H. & J. 335 · General Court of Virginia · Sep 15, 1802

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    11 Va. 711 · General Court of Virginia · Dec 15, 1841

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    2 Va. 516 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1826

    , with pistols loaded with powder and bullets of lead, and that he the said Brown, a certain challenge, in the name of the said Brown, in the form of a letter, to the said Rust directed, did then and there wickedly write, … To maintain this position, the Case of The King v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    2 Va. 516 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1826

    , with pistols loaded with powder and bullets of lead, and that he the said Brown, a certain challenge, in the name of the said Brown, in the form of a letter, to the said Rust directed, did then and there wickedly write, … To maintain this position, the Case of The King v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Brown

    1 White & W. 755 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 1, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ware v. Brown

    2 Md. 456 · General Court of Virginia · May 15, 1790

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kerrigan

    4 Redf. 146 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1879

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Southworth

    1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 77 · Saratoga Chancery Court · Oct 19, 1841

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McMurtry v. Brown

    228 S.W. 1087 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 30, 1921

    V. Brown, filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, basing his motion upon the ground that the judgment had been compromised and settled and a release executed by him.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Brown

    1 Va. Col. Dec. 114 · General Court of Virginia · Oct 15, 1729

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.