Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

2.95s

  • Belgian Endive Marketing Board, Inc. v. American Airlines

    169 Misc. 2d 917 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 30, 1996

    (Chan v Korean Air Lines, 490 US 122 [1989].) … In the instant case it is unclear if the damage occurred on board or at American’s facility between June 21, 1993 and June 22, 1993.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Word of His Grace Fellowship, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    711 N.E.2d 875 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 30, 1999

    However, as the State Board acknowledges, this Court’s decision in Sangra-lea Boys Fund, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 686 N.E.2d 954 (Ind. Tax Ct.1997), revieiv denied requires a different result. … Brown & Sons Fuel Co., 706 N.E.2d 556, 560-61 (Ind.Ct.App.) (evaluating another statutory definition of "owner”), modified, 711 N.E.2d 1286 (Ind.Ct.App. 1999).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Miller

    759 A.2d 455 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2002

    See also, Commonwealth v. Wadzinski, supra, at 129. The court then affirmed that Canon 7(B)(1)(d) did serve compelling state interests. Citing Brown v. … In support of this holding the court again referred to Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Huntington County Community School Corp. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners

    757 N.E.2d 235 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 26, 2001

    See Bieliski v. Zorn, 627 N.E.2d 880, 885 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994). … The Court refers the State Board to UACC Midwest, Inc. v. Dep't of State Revenue, 629 N.E.2d 1295 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Riley at Jackson Remonstrance Group v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    663 N.E.2d 802 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 28, 1996

    Riley at Jackson Remonstrance Group v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 642 N.E.2d 562, 565 (Ind. Tax 1994) (quoting State Board's July 11, 1994, Findings and Order) (emphasis omitted). … Knauf Fiber Glass GmbH v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 629 N.E.2d 959, 960 (Ind.Tax.1994). Cross motions for summary judgment do not alter this rule. Roehl Transport, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Charities & Correction v. Darge

    1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 373 · New York Marine Court · Sep 23, 1881

    Stimson, 4 Hill, 136 ; Comm’ rs, &c., v. Peck, 5 Id. 215 ; Paige v. Fazackerly, 36 Barb. 392 ; Gould v. Glass, 19 Id. 179; Hill & Den. *374 Supp. 279 ; Agent, &c. v. Rickeman, 1 Den. 279 ; Trustees, &c., v. … Pr. 263 ; Hathaway v. Town of Homer, 5 Lans. 273 ; Hart v. Benson, 18 How. Pr. 302 ). The “ board,” as such, lias no legal entity, and is incapable of maintaining an action.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vanessa A. Purdom v. Knox County Assessor and Knox County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals, and Indiana Board of Tax Review

    Indiana Tax Court · Feb 11, 2020

    PURDOM, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. … Kellam v. Fountain Cty. Assessor, 999 N.E.2d 120, 122 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2013), review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-180 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 1976

    The Parker v. Brown doctrine has been followed regularly. … Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners, Okl., 83 P.2d 560 , 561 (1938).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bear's Nest Condominium Ass'n v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

    25 N.J. Tax 237 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 19, 2009

    Stores Co. v. Bomugh of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985); Danis v. Middlesex County Board of Taxation, 113 N.J.Super. 6 , 272 A.2d 542 (App.Div.1971); Regent Care Center, Inc. v. … See Brunson v. Rutherford Lodge, 128 N.J.Super. 66 , 319 A.2d 80 (Law Div.1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Arter

    44 S.W.2d 913 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

    V. Brown, attorney-at-law, Texarkana, Texas. … Board of Com’rs, 37 Ind. 335 ; Walker v. Hill, 21 Me. 482 ; Farrar v. Parker, 3 Allen (Mass.) 557; Thayer v. Overseers of Poor, 5 Hill (N. Y.) 443; Cooke v. Cooke, 41 Md. 369 ; Owens v. Gotzian, 4 Dill. 438 , Fed. Cas.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Clark County v. Indiana Department of Local Government Finance

    31 N.E.3d 552 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 24, 2015

    See Brown v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 989 N.E.2d 386, 388 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2013). … Board of Comm’rs of Cnty. of Jasper v. Vincent, 988 N.E.2d 1280, 1281 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2013) (citation omitted).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Multnomah County Board of Commissioners

    12 Or. Tax 377 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 1993

    Plaintiff paid her property taxes on November 15, 1991. 1 On September 3, 1992, the Oregon Supreme Court in City of Portland v. … Welch v. Unified Sewerage Agency, 12 OTR 359 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1952

    V. … BOARD OF EDUCATION' — UNCONSTITUTIONAL `SEPARATE BUT EQUAL') CITE: 70 O.S.H. 4-22 (J. H. JOHNSON)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Riley at Jackson Remonstrance Group v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners

    642 N.E.2d 562 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 10, 1994

    Thompson v. Genis Building Corp. (1979), 182 Ind.App. 200, 201 , 394 N.E.2d 242, 243 . Further, "[alll reasonable intend-ments and inferences are to be taken against the movant." Id. … Harlan Sprague Dawley Inc. v. Indiana Dept. of State Revenue (1992), Ind.Tax, 605 N.E.2d 1222, 1225 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Knights v. State

    161 Misc. 552 · New York Court of Claims · Nov 17, 1936

    This document is now presented as a “ release ” and argument is advanced that it is a bar to recovery by Knights and Brown. … (Champion Oil Co. v. State, 161 Misc. 143 ; also Caldwell & Ward Brass Co. v. State, Id. 147 . See, also, Dwornik v. State, 155 id. 458.)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.

    39 Misc. 2d 435 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jun 11, 1963

    (People v. Feeney, 24 Misc 2d 74 ; People v. Vetri, 309 N. Y. 401 ; Paterson v. University of State of N. Y., 35 Misc 2d 608 ; People v. Smoke, 38 Misc 2d 939 .) … Yellowley, 290 F. 849 ; Goldsmith v. Board of Educ., 66 Cal. App. 157 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McMaster v. Board of Supervisors

    4 Hill & Den. 20 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 15, 1842

    So far as relates to the question of taxation, there is no difference between banks created under the general law and those which have special charters.' " Both are corporations; (The People v. … Co. v. Clute, 4 Paige, 384 ; *26 1 R. S. 387, § 1; id. 389, § 6.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scott, Kelly v. Hardeman Co. Sheriff's Dept.

    2015 TN WC 4 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 14, 2015

    Scott testified he returned to work to give his immediate supervisor, Captain Leonard Brown, a physician's off-work slip. He stated he told Captain Brown he broke his hand at work. Mr. … Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (quoting Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991)). In Willis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-105 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1971

    In answer to your first question, it is clear that each elector in a School Board Election is required to be registered with the County Election Board. … Brown v. State Election Board, Okla., 369 P.2d 140 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Methodist Hospitals, Inc. v. Lake County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals

    862 N.E.2d 335 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 10, 2007

    STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. See College Corner, L.P. v. … Tax Assessment Bd. of Appeals v. United Ancient Order of Druids-Grove # 29, 847 N.E.2d 924, 928 (Ind.2006).

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.