Case law

Krieger v. Johnson

2014 NCBC 13 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 30, 2014

See Coley v. N.C. Nat'l Bank, 41 N.C. App. 121 (1979). 5 Am. Compl. ¶ 38. 6 Defendants William Barnet, III; G. Alex Bernhardt, Sr.; Michael G. Browning; Daniel R. Dimicco; John H. … Any other rule would deter corporate boards from the optimal rational acceptance of risk, for reasons explained elsewhere. See Gagliardi v.

Mueller-Rice, Meagan v. MEDAT AG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine

2019 TN WC 90 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 31, 2019

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Concerning temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits, Ms. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

State Line Elevator, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

526 N.E.2d 753 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 13, 1988

Independent Warehouses, Inc. v. Scheele (1947), 331 U.S. 70, 74 , 67 S.Ct. 1062, 1065 , 91 L.Ed. 1346 ; Minnesota v. Blasius (1933), 290 U.S. 1, 10 , 54 S.Ct. 34, 37 , 78 L.Ed. 131 ; Arthur Walter Seed Co. v. … Thus, the court must deny this portion of the State Board's motion.

Opinion No. 75-253 (1975) Ag Part I of Part II

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975

See Rush v. Brown, 187 Okl. 97 , 101 P.2d 262 , and also in the case of Harris v. State, ex rel. … (Emphasis added) In Brown v.

Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurry

41 S.W.2d 215 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 22, 1931

V. Brown in the concluding argument to the jury and while discussing the argument of said J. I. Wheeler above referred to, said: “ T will show you what McCurry said about this claim. … Co. v. Irvine, supra, Judge Speer, in Bell v.

Franchise Realty Corp. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners

682 N.E.2d 832 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 27, 1997

STANDARD OF REVIEW Determinations made by the State Board are accorded great deference when the Board is acting within its scope of authority. Bender v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 676 N.E.2d 1113, 1114 (Ind.Tax Ct.1997). … When that taxpayer pursues an improper method, the State Board’s determination will be upheld. Bender, 676 N.E.2d at 1114 ; See Williams Indus. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 648 N.E.2d 713, 718 (Ind.Tax Ct.1995).

Harbor Food Plaza, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

638 N.E.2d 898 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 15, 1994

DISCUSSION AND DECISION STANDARD OF REVIEW The State Board is accorded great deference when acting within the seope of its authority. Centrium Group v. … The taxpayer, like any other party appealing an administrative decision, bears the burden to show the State Board's assessment was inaccurate. See Meridian Hills Country Club v.

Coggins v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 24, 2008

Stat. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Taylor v. North Carolina Dept. of Correction , 88 N.C.App. 446 , 451 , 363 S.E.2d 868 , 871 (1988). 5.

Brown v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Tax Court · Aug 15, 2016

Wihtol I v. Dept. of Rev., 21 OTR 260, 267–68 (2013); TCR-MD 16. … See Biss v. Dept. of.

Canal Realty-Indy Castor v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

744 N.E.2d 597 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 5, 2001

In Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1241 (Ind. … See City of Mitchell v.

Ruotolo v. State

151 Misc. 2d 820 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 31, 1991

It was claimants’ theory that had the Board been notified, it would have revoked Agosto’s parole, thereby preventing the *822 tragedy. … Claimants therefore cite Brown v Ellis ( 145 Misc 2d 1085 , affd sub nom.

Community Christian Church, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

523 N.E.2d 462 · Indiana Tax Court · May 5, 1988

The State Board has not favored the court with any argument on this issue. Exemption statutes must be strictly construed. Indiana Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists v. … In Pizzagalli Construction Co. v.

Board of Managers of General Apartment Corp. Condominium v. Gans

72 Misc. 2d 726 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 20, 1972

The court finds that the defendants may not attack the validity of the board of managers in this proceeding. (Lewis v. Matthews, 161 App. Div. 107 .) … This court will uphold the present charges levied by the board of managers for the purposes of this action as at least the act of a de facto board. (Lewis v. Matthews, 161 App. Div. 107 , supra.)

Indianapolis Racquet Club, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

722 N.E.2d 926 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 31, 2000

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives the final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. See Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … To support its claim, Racquet Club cites to State Board of Tax Commissioners v.

In re Skipwith

14 Misc. 2d 325 · New York Family Court · Dec 15, 1958

It should not have required Brown v. Board of Educ. ( 347 U. S. 483 ) in 1954 to alert the Board of Education of the City of New York to its constitutional responsibilities. At least by 1950, when Sweatt v. … Yet the fact remains that more than eight years after the Supreme Court ruling in Sweatt v. Painter (supra) and more than four years after its ruling in Brown v. Board of Educ.

Alte Salems Kirche, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

733 N.E.2d 40 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 2, 2000

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives the State Board’s decisions great deference when the Board acts within the scope of its authority. See Bender v. … See State Board of Tax Commissioners v.

Town of St. John v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

730 N.E.2d 240 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 16, 2000

For an overview of this case’s procedural history, see State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. … In Brown v.

Consolidated Underwriters v. Kelly

15 S.W.2d 229 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 27, 1929

Recognizing the v-alidity of this marriage, she lived with George Brown at her home in Amelia, La., until 1925, when, learning that Joe Kelly was living in Beaumont, Tex., she deserted her husband and joined Joe Kelly at … The death of George Brown made no change in their relations.

Williams v. The Steamship Columbia

1 Wash. Terr. 95 · Washington Territory · Dec 15, 1860

Some of them specifying Olympia or Brown’s wharf, have been presented and treated as bills of lading, on the principle that the written acknowledgment of the reception on board, of a particular quantity or parcel of goods-in … Treight was demanded on the arrival of the goods at Brown’s wharf. The goods were taken from the warehouse on. the wharf by G-. W.

All Children's Hospital v. Hospital Cost Containment Board

28 Fla. Supp. 2d 196 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Feb 17, 1988

Hall v. Career Service Commission, 478 So.2d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). … Implicit in the requirement that the Board establish a uniform financial reporting system is that there be power in a single entity, the Board, to reject reports that are not uniform. 13.