Case law

Yates v. Brown

2012 NCBC 22 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 13, 2012

Yates v. Brown, 2012 NCBC 22. … [20] Even though Brown is a minority shareholder, Plaintiffs contend that Brown owed a fiduciary duty to Yates. Plaintiffs cite to Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc., 140 N.C.

Surratt v. Brown

2016 NCBC 27 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 1, 2016

Surratt v. Brown, 2016 NCBC 27. … Surratt v. Brown, No. 15 CVS 1551, 2015 NCBC LEXIS 75, at *21 (N.C. Super. Ct. July 27, 2015).

Brown v. Gump

59 How. Pr. 507 · New York Marine Court · Sep 15, 1880

Penoyer v. Brown

13 Abb. N. Cas. 82 · New York Marine Court · Jun 15, 1882

The distinction between this case and Miller v. Levi ( 44 N. Y. 489 ), although close, is yet obvious, upon examination.

Langert v. Brown

3 Wash. Terr. 102 · Washington Territory · Jan 28, 1887

(Davis v. Eppinger, 18 Cal. 379 ; Speyer v. Ihmels, 21 Cal. 281 .) The same rule prevails in Louisiana, from which state California borrowed its system of intervention. … (Robinson v. Elliott, 22 Wall. 513 ; Abbott v. Goodwin, 20 Me. 408 ; Crockett v. Harney, 91 N. Y. 214 ; Jones on Chattel Mortgages, secs. 416-425.) The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Greene, C.

Surratt v. Brown

2015 NCBC 72 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 27, 2015

Surratt v. Brown, 2015 NCBC 72. … The conversion claim is then limited to Brown, and to the extent Plaintiff asserts a conversion claim against the Moving Entity Defendants, any such claim is DISMISSED. v.

Brown v. State

205 Misc. 226 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1954

v. … Y. 356 ; Robison v. Lockridge, 230 App. Div. 389 . See, also, Blaechinska v. Howard Mission, 130 N. Y. 497 ; Marks v. Marks, 250 App. Div. 289, 291 , and MacFadden v. MacFadden, 171 Misc. 482 , affd. 257 App.

Lumpkin v. Brown

229 S.W. 498 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 30, 1921

Brown, sued A. A. Lumpkin, administrator of the estate of Chas. R. … Russell v.

Brown v. Ellis

145 Misc. 2d 1085 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 9, 1989

OPINION OF THE COURT Frank V. Ponterio, J. On July 31, 1985 plaintiff Roger Brown was on duty as a New York City police officer, assigned to speed enforcement in an unmarked car. … (Murphy v Board of Educ., 104 AD2d, supra, at 797.) This is however not an inflexible rule.

Brown v. State

24 Misc. 2d 358 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 16, 1960

(Huff v. State of New York, 271 App. Div. 1040 .) … (McCombs v. Hegarty, 205 Misc. 937 ; Curtis v. Kozeluh, 50 N. Y. S. 2d 883.) Words alone, no matter how coarse and abusive, never justify physical assault (Matter of Levy v. World-Telegram, 255 App.

People v. Brown

143 Misc. 2d 270 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Apr 5, 1989

(People v Alvarez, 70 NY2d 375, 380 [1987], quoting People v Mertz, 68 NY2d 136, 148 [1986], citing People v Gower, 42 NY2d 117 [1977].) … (People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]; People v Sorenson, 112 AD2d 1016 [2d Dept 1985]; State v Hvistendahl, supra.) 4.

Commonwealth v. Brown

1 Vaux 24 · Recorder of Philadelphia · Jul 1, 1846

In the case of Commonwealth v.

Brown v. State

204 Misc. 1013 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1953

I am in entire accord with the decision of your Honor in the Bono claim (supra), and respectfully submit that under your Honor’s decision of July 16, 1953 in that claim, the within motion in the Brown claim (supra) should … The Attorney-General overlooks the import of the disposition in Bono v. State of New York (Claim 31339).

Gregory v. Brown

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 11, 2007

Brown Sons at all times relevant to this case. 3. The PMA Group Insurance Company is the carrier on this claim. 4. … Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc ., 143 N.C. App. 259 , 545 S.E.2d 485 (2001); Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution , supra .

Brown v. Nomaco

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 24, 2000

Webb v. Brown

2 Posey 36 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 15, 1880

See Urquhart v. Burleson, 6 Tex., 511 ; Bass Mitchell, 22 Tex., 294 ; Mitchell v. Burdett, id., 535; Booth v. Strippleman, 26 Tex., 442 ; Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex., 111 ; McCown v. Hill, 26 Tex., 361 ; Castleman v. … Chapman, 1 Root, 528 ; Morris v. Owens, 3 Strobhart (S. C.), 199; Steiner v. Baughman, 2 Jones (Pa.), 106; Pecare v. Chouteau, 13 Missouri, 527; Hall v. Mayhew, 15 Md., 551 ; Wright v. Wright, 34 Ala., 194 ; Beal v.

Brown v. Garcia

2 Misc. 3d 915 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 16, 2004

Shapiro, Inc. v Milspemes Corp., 20 AD2d 857, 857 [1964]). Here, defendants would be entitled to summary judgment dismissing Brown’s claim on behalf of her son if this court does not permit the discontinuance. … Notwithstanding that Noguera, as an infant, would have benefitted from a tolling period of the statute of limitations (see, CPLR 208) if Brown did not commence this action on his behalf, defendants are prejudiced if Brown

Shockley v. Brown

1 Wash. Terr. 463 · Washington Territory · Dec 15, 1874

Brown v. Hazard

2 Wash. Terr. 464 · Washington Territory · Jul 15, 1885

Errors, therefore, should have been assigned, conformably to Eule V. Appeal dismissed. We concur : S. C. Wingard, Associate Justice. Geo. Turner, Associate Justice.

Brown v. N.C.D.O.C.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 19, 1996