Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.35s

  • Indiana Model Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    639 N.E.2d 695 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 25, 1994

    See Sherry Designs, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1992), Ind.Tax, 589 N.E.2d 285 . When a rule of procedure, as promulgated by the supreme court, and a statute are in conflict, the rule prevails. Augustine v. … Monarch Steel v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 611 N.E.2d 708, 710 (quoting IND.CODE 33-8-5-1l(a). See also Mynsberge v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 612 N.E.2d 1129 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • W.H. Paige & Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    732 N.E.2d 269 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 19, 2000

    The taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating the invalidity of the State Board’s final determination. See Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998). … In Rogers v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 565 N.E.2d 398, 400 (Ind.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lincoln County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 26, 2025

    BROWN, Trustee for the ) Richard Brown Trust, ) ) Plaintiff, ) TC-MD 230081R … See Clackamas County Assessor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • LDI Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    759 N.E.2d 685 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 18, 2001

    ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board's final determinations when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … Componz, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Comm'rs, 741 N.E.2d 442, 446 (Ind. Tax Ct.2000).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dav-Con, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    702 N.E.2d 1137 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 8, 1998

    in Dav-Con, Inc. v. … See Clark, 694 N.E.2d at 1240 -41 (citing Estate of McLendon v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Peters

    14 S.W.2d 1007 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 20, 1929

    Snyder’s Workmen’s Compensation Haws, vol. 2, § 523; Lundy v. George Brown Co., 93 N. Y. Law, 107, 106 A. 362 ; Tanner v. Aluminum Castings Co., 210 Mich. 366 , 178 N. W. 69 ; Krueger v. Hayes Mfg. … In Bramble v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Peters, 17 S.W.2d 457 (1929)Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Beemiller, Inc.

    33 N.Y.3d 523 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · May 9, 2019

    The constitutional inquiry "focuses on 'the relationship among the defendant, the forum, and the litigation' " ( Keeton v. … Burger King Corp. v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Scantron Corp. v. New York City Board of Education

    3 Misc. 3d 1042 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 21, 2004

    Corp. v Board of Educ. of Byron-Bergen Cent. School Dist., 221 AD2d 927, 928 [4th Dept 1995].) … (See Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 547-549 [1983]; Allshine, C.S. v South Orangetown Cent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gale Builders, Inc. v. Hunterdon County Board of Taxation

    8 N.J. Tax 16 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 13, 1985

    Terhune v. … Stores v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Western Select Properties, L.P. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    639 N.E.2d 1068 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 9, 1994

    STANDARD OF REVIEW "When acting within the scope of its authority, the State Board is accorded great deference." Mahan v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1998), Ind.Tax, 622 N.E.2d 1058, 1061 (citing Wirth v. … -It is the State Board's duty to assess similar properties consistently. Bielski v. Zorn (1994), Ind.Tax, 627 N.E.2d 880, 885 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Miller Village Properties Co. v. Indiana Board of Tax Review

    779 N.E.2d 986 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 11, 2002

    ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. See Thousand Trails, Inc. v. … Musgrave v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 658 N.E.2d 135, 138 (Ind.Tax Ct.1995).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1994

    Brown at 1042, citing Beqich v. Jefferson, 441 P.2d 27,33 (Alaska 1968). The Court in Brown also looked back to its case of Wimberly v. … Brown at 1042.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mount Laurel Township v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

    25 N.J. Tax 319 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 15, 2009

    In Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, supra, 23 N.J.Tax at 469-70 , the court concluded that the principles enunciated by our Supreme Court in City of Newark v. … See, e.g., Essex County Bd. of Taxation v. City of Newark, 73 N.J. 69, 72 , 372 A.2d 607 (1977); Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of Edgewater, 68 N.J. 405, 411 , 346 A.2d 396 (1975); City of Passaic v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Department of Revenue

    Oregon Tax Court · Dec 30, 2013

    BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) TC-MD 130450C ) v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Graybar Electric Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    723 N.E.2d 491 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 2, 2000

    In support of this claim, Graybar asserts that State Board of Tax Commissioners of Indiana v. … Corp. v. Department of State Revenue, 718 N.E.2d 821, 828 (Ind.Tax Ct.1999); see also LeSea Broad. Corp. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 512 N.E.2d 506, 509 (Ind.Tax Ct.1987) adopted by State Board of Tax Commissioners v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Vicari v. Bethlehem Township & Hunterdon County Board of Taxation

    8 N.J. Tax 513 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 2, 1986

    King v. Ruckman, 22 N.J.Eq. 551 (E. & A.1871); Locher v. Locher, supra. It was stated in King v. … In Stone v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

    23 N.J. Tax 466 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 1, 2007

    The authority of a county board of taxation to order a revaluation was recognized in Bergen County Board of Taxation v. … Quoting from this Court’s earlier opinion in Flanagan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Inland Container Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    756 N.E.2d 1109 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 1, 2001

    Florer v. Sheridan, 137 Ind. 28 , 86 N.E. 365 , 369 (1894); Davis, 200 N.E. at 241 ; Board of Comm'rs of Johnson County v. … As part of its argument that Inland should receive no remedy, the State Board unsuccessfully tries to distinguish due process cases that require a remedy (Newsweek v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • W.H. Paige & Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    711 N.E.2d 552 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 22, 1999

    Co. v. … Skendzel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kennedy-Brown, Brandi v/. CoreCivic of TN, LLC, a/k/a CCA of Tennessee, LLC

    2024 TN WC 69 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 27, 2024

    Morton v. Morsey Constructors, d/b/a Harper Industries, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 33 (Oct. 4, 2021). … Moreover, in Pool v. Jarmon D&Q Transport, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.