Case law

Fleet Supply, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

747 N.E.2d 645 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 24, 2001

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board's final determinations when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Weigel Einters., Inc. v. … Whitley Prods., Inc. v.

Brown v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jul 29, 2025

Enterprises, Inc. v. … In Phillips v.

LeSea Broadcasting Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

512 N.E.2d 506 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 23, 1987

A line of Indiana cases provides authority for the Board's position. Clary v. National Friction Products, Inc. (1972), 259 Ind. 581 , 290 N.E.2d 53 ; Ball Stores, Inc. v. … The authorities supporting the Board's argument begin with Weatherhead Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners (1972), 151 Ind.App. 680 , 281 N.E.2d 547 .

Rott Development Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

647 N.E.2d 1157 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 20, 1995

See Kimco Leasing, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1998), Ind.Tax, 622 N.E.2d 590, 592 . The State Board contends that it did not err in denying Rott's Form 188. Citing Hatcher v. … State Board of Tax Commissioners (1990), Ind.Tax, 561 N.E.2d 852 ( Hatcher 1 ), and Hatcher v. State Board of Tax Commissioners (1992), Ind.

Hailey v. School Board of Palm Beach County

17 Fla. Supp. 2d 163 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Oct 14, 1985

Respondent, School Board of Palm Beach County, has objected to this request and maintains that Petitioner is properly placed in the Severely Emotionally Handicapped (SEH) Program and further contends that that program is … by the state board as acceptable. . . .”

Washington Township v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

7 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 7, 1984

Where a county board has utilized the director’s school aid table and applied it uniformly a presumption of validity attaches to a county board’s determination in its adoption of an equalization table. Kearney v. … In Secaucus v. Taxation Div.

Indiana Sugars, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

683 N.E.2d 1383 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 19, 1997

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives the State Board’s decisions great deference when the Board acts within the scope of its authority. Bender v. … Nine years later in Tri Creek Lumber Co. v.

Titan Sports, Inc. v. State Athletic Control Board

11 N.J. Tax 259 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 17, 1990

The board distinguishes cases granting First Amendment protection to other forms of entertainment, e.g., Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. … The board denies that New Jersey lacks substantial nexus with the interstate communications and relies on Goldberg v.

Componx, Inc. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners

741 N.E.2d 442 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 22, 2000

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership v. … See also Whitley Prods., Inc. v.

Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of Education

80 Misc. 2d 944 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 25, 1974

(See Society of New York Hosp. v Mogensen, 75 Misc 2d 62 ; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par 8301.17.) … (See CCA, § 1705 and Society of New York Hosp. v Mogensen, supra.)

Sisters of Charity v. Washington County Board of Commissioners

3 Or. Tax 106 · Oregon Tax Court · Aug 10, 1967

These cases are before the court on two Alternative Writs of Mandamus requiring the Board of Commissioners of Washington County to consider the petitioner’s claim for real property tax refunds for 1965-66 and 1966-67. … The county board" of equalization and the county court are without jurisdiction to grant or deny claims for exemption as charitable organizations. University v. Multnomah County, 31 Or 498 , 50 P 532 (1897).

Wareco Enterprises, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

689 N.E.2d 1299 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 18, 1997

Bock, 683 N.E.2d at 1371 (citing Bender v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 676 N.E.2d 1113, 1115 (Ind.Tax Ct.1997)). … See Bock, 683 N.E.2d at 1372 ; Hatcher v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 561 N.E.2d 852, 857 (Ind.Tax Ct.1990).

Trinity Episcopal Church v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

694 N.E.2d 816 · Indiana Tax Court · May 1, 1998

Corp. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 525 N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.Tax Ct.1988); Indianapolis Elks Bldg. Corp. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 145 Ind.App. 522 , 251 N.E.2d 673 (1969); State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … In support of its final determination, the State Board raises an issue not discussed in Foursquare Tabernacle. In Stark v .

Herff Jones, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

512 N.E.2d 485 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 30, 1987

In the case of Roeschlein v. … Sanders v. State (1984), Ind., 466 N.E.2d 424, 428 .

Titan Sports, Inc. v. State Athletic Control Board

12 N.J. Tax 214 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 14, 1992

Titan Sports v. Athletic Control Board, 11 N.J.Tax 259 (Tax Ct.1990). Two issues of material fact remained with regard to the First Amendment and the Commerce Clause. … Thus, the decision in Leathers v.

Township of Jefferson v. Morris County Board of Taxation

26 N.J. Tax 129 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 8, 2011

See Town of Secaucus v. … Jefferson relies on Abe Schrader Corp. v.

Indiana Model Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

639 N.E.2d 695 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 25, 1994

See Sherry Designs, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1992), Ind.Tax, 589 N.E.2d 285 . When a rule of procedure, as promulgated by the supreme court, and a statute are in conflict, the rule prevails. Augustine v. … Monarch Steel v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 611 N.E.2d 708, 710 (quoting IND.CODE 33-8-5-1l(a). See also Mynsberge v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 612 N.E.2d 1129 .

Ispat Inland, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

757 N.E.2d 1078 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 7, 2001

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board's final determinations when the State Board acts within the seope of its authority. Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … See Brandmaier v. Metropolitan Dev.

W.H. Paige & Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

732 N.E.2d 269 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 19, 2000

The taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating the invalidity of the State Board’s final determination. See Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998). … In Rogers v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 565 N.E.2d 398, 400 (Ind.

Governours Square Apartments v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

528 N.E.2d 864 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 2, 1987

In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. … State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Valparaiso Golf Club, Inc. (1975), 164 Ind.App. 687 , 330 N.E.2d 394 .