Case law

Joint Industry Board of Painting v. Kaplan

66 Misc. 2d 427 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 22, 1971

(Perma-Stone Bi-County Corp. v. Ackerman, 15 Misc 2d 640, 641 [Sup. Ct., Kings, 1959], affd 8 A D 2d 731 [2d Dept., 1959.]) … Y. *431 Jur., Damages, § 157 ; Kelly v. Board of Educ., 8 Misc 2d 1007 [Sup. Ct., Kings, 1957], affd. 7 A D 2d 856 [2d Dept., 1959], affd. 8 N Y 2d 764 [1960].)

Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 7, 1998

This vehicle did not have a running board. Newer style ambulances now have a van-type chassis with a running board. 5.

Montgomery v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

708 N.E.2d 936 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 14, 1999

Barnes v. … See Board of Sch. Comm'rs v. Eakin, 444 N.E.2d 1197 , 1202 (Ind.1983). .

Hall v. Montgomery County Board of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 25, 1997

No Montgomery County Board of Education official and/or agent had any prior knowledge of any prior confrontations involving plaintiff and the other students who attacked plaintiff on the bus. 5. Mr. … Capel or any other agent and/or official of the Montgomery County Board of Education. The fact that there were rules violations does not bear a direct relationship in and of itself to the "foreseeability" element. 13.

Hassell v. Onslow County Board of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 5, 2005

Doggett v. South Atl. Warehouse Co., 212 N.C. 599 , 194 S.E. 111 (1937), cited with approval in Adams v. AVX Corp., 349 N.C. 676 , 509 S.E.2d 411 (1998). … As the North Carolina Supreme Court stated in Johnson v.

Perry v. Hampton Woods Board Care, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 22, 1999

Coulter v. Catawba County Board of Edu.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 2, 2007

On or about August 17, 2001, Brenda Foster was an employee of the Catawba County Board of Education and was the driver of the school bus on which Joshua Coulter was a passenger. 2. On August 17, 2001, Ms. … Simmons v. Columbus County Bd. of Educ. , 171 N.C. App. 725 , 615 S.E. 2d 69 (2005). 2. Plaintiff failed to prove that defendant was negligent and that negligence caused the damages of which plaintiff complains. Id.

Barth, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

699 N.E.2d 800 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 22, 1998

v. … The Court notes that the State Board did not make a contemporaneous objection to Mr. Miller’s trial testimony. See Indiana Ass'n of Seventh Day-Adventists v.

Barry v. Board of Managers

18 Misc. 3d 559 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 12, 2007

II v Barry (SCR 60177/05). … of the board.

Kent Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

685 N.E.2d 1156 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 20, 1997

claim arising under the tax laws of Indiana, see State v. … See Mills v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 639 N.E.2d 698 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994) (where State Board does not adhere to strict notice requirements, it cannot sua sponte increase an assessment).

Centrium Group v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

599 N.E.2d 242 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 17, 1992

DISCUSSION AND DECISION When acting within the scope of its authority, the State Board is accorded great deference, Rogers v. … See, e.g., Smith v. Breeding (1992), Ind.App., 586 N.E.2d 932 ; Holland v. King (1986), Ind.App., 500 N.E.2d 1229 . In 1990, the court of appeals decided Elizondo v.

Hefner v. Wake County Board of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 30, 2006

The Industrial Commission has jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. N.C. Gen. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). Defendant admits negligence and proximate cause. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-291 (a). 3.

Crocker v. School Board of Putnam County

22 Fla. Supp. 2d 275 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Sep 9, 1986

E.g, School Board of Pinellas County, v. G.M., No. 82-3358E (DOAH; April 28, 1983) Marshall has not been placed in an exceptional education program to this point. … It is Marshall or, technically, his mother on his behalf, who seeks a change in placement, not the school board. Petitioner has not met her burden of proof.

Hoogenboom-Nofziger v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

715 N.E.2d 1018 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 23, 1999

As HN correctly notes, the State Board derives its authority from the General Assembly and only has those powers granted by statute. See State Bd. of Public Welfare v. … See Floyd v. State, 650 N.E.2d 28, 32 (Ind.1994); Pope v. Pope, 701 N.E.2d 587, 591-92 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (discussing a timely objection to the authority of a judge pro tempore); Catellier v.

Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 31, 1996

This vehicle did not have a running board. Newer style ambulances now have a van-type chassis with a running board. 5.

Kenney, Tracy v. Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.

2025 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 13, 2025

Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015).

Board of Commissioners of Charities v. Litzen

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 374 · New York Marine Court · Sep 23, 1881

Howell Township v. Monmouth County Board of Taxation

18 N.J. Tax 149 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 19, 1999

The municipality timely filed a complaint against the county board with the Tax Court. The court subsequently granted the developer’s motion to intervene, as the developer is the proper defendant, not the county board. … Maxwell Co. v.

Dover Township Board of Supervisors v. DER

21 Pa. D. & C.3d 451 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Aug 1, 1980

Kravitz v. DER, EHB Docket no. 77-118-W, October 30, 1978. We believe.this to be the quintessential case for application of the regulation. … We have followed a similar procedure recently in Borough of Mercer and Mercer Borough Sewage Treatment Authority v.

Levitan v. Metropolitan Taxi Board of Trade

68 Misc. 2d 515 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 22, 1971

Plaintiff taxicab driver sues both his employer (defendant Cross County Taxi Service, Inc.), said defendant employer’s association (defendant Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade), and the labor union of which he, the plaintiff