Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.57s

  • Ward v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 20, 2002

    Workman, Jr. operated a school bus for defendant in this matter and was in the scope of his employment for Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education when the bus that he was driving struck plaintiff's bus. … Plaintiff found employment as a substitute teacher with the Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education on January 4, 1999 and worked through the end of the academic year in 1999, approximately June 9, 1999. 12.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams Industries v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    648 N.E.2d 713 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 30, 1995

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The State Board is accorded great deference when it acts within the seope of its authority. Mahan v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind. Tax, 622 N.E.2d 1058, 1061 . … See also Reams v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 620 N.E.2d 758, 760 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Bender v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners

    676 N.E.2d 1113 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 5, 1997

    Williams Indus. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 648 N.E.2d 718, 715 (Ind. Tax Ct.1995). Thus, the State Board is accorded great deference when it acts within the scope of its authority. Id. … See Herb v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 656 N.E.2d 890, 894 (Ind.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Chapman v. Onslow County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 16, 2001

    As a school bus driver and employee of defendant, Onslow County Board of Education, Kathy Parker Overton had a responsibility to stop at each designated bus stop to pick up each child assigned to her school bus route when … Kathy Parker Overton was engaged in work and was about the business of the defendant, Onslow County Board of Education. 11.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board v. Department of Revenue

    4 Or. Tax 410 · Oregon Tax Court · May 27, 1971

    However, the working drawings were not sent to the Oregon State Board of Health until October 24, 1968. Bids were let in December 1968 and opened on February 7, 1969. … Willamette Univ. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Oregon State Board of Forestry

    5 Or. Tax 193 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 9, 1973

    that the board had no legal authority to take the requested action. … Pilgrim Turkey Pckrs. v. Dept. of Rev., 261 Or 305 , 493 P2d 1372 (1972)), but no determination is called for on this issue because it was never pleaded. Brandtjen & Kluge v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Sampson County Board of Commissioners

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 10, 2008

    . § 97-2 (6); Richards v. Town of Valdese , 92 N.C. App. 222 , 224 , 374 S.E.2d 116 , 118 (1988), disc. review denied , 324 N.C. 337 , 378 S.E.2d 799 (1989). 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 , 499 S.E.2d 197 (1998). 3. Subject to the provisions of N.C. Gen.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Cumberland County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 22, 2009

    Russell v. Lowes , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). *********** Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the undersigned enters the following: AWARD 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Farrior v. Duplin County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 19, 2007

    Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 4. … Primm v. King , 249 N.C. 228 , 235 , 106 S.E.2d 223 , 229 (1958).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zakutansky v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    758 N.E.2d 103 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 31, 2001

    Zakutansky v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 691 N.E.2d 1365, 1870-71 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1998). On September 9, 1998, the State Board conducted its remand hearing. … ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Louis D. Realty Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oakes v. Caldwell County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 29, 2006

    Jeffrey Knapp, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, for a second opinion. … Stat. § 97-53 (13); Booker v. Medical Center, supra. 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mynsberge v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    612 N.E.2d 1129 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 23, 1993

    The State Board has raised an affirmative defense alleging lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Mynsberge's appeal. The sole issue for the court is whether the rule enunciated in Elizondo v. … The issues raised by the State Board's affirmative defense mirror those raised in Elizondo, 588 N.E.2d 501 , and in Centrium Group v. State Board of Tax Commissioners (1992), Ind.Tax, 599 N.E.2d 242 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Green v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 21, 1999

    Harrelson is board-certified in orthopaedic surgery and pathology, and has been on the faculty of both of those departments at Duke University Medical School since 1973. Based upon Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dana Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    694 N.E.2d 1244 · Indiana Tax Court · May 7, 1998

    The State Board counters this argument by noting that Dana’s allegations are nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to have this Court retroactively apply its decision in Town of St. John v. … John v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, this Court limited the application of its holding to future assessments and appeals made on or after May 11, 1999. 691 N.E.2d 1387, 1389-90 (Ind.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Gerald v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    727 N.E.2d 1133 · Indiana Tax Court · May 1, 2000

    ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board’s final determinations when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. See Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … The Court will not entertain facial challenges to the State Board’s regulations. See Dana Corp. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1244, 1247 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 31, 1996

    This vehicle did not have a running board. Newer style ambulances now have a van-type chassis with a running board. 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bishop v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    743 N.E.2d 810 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 14, 2001

    Co. v. … John v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 690 N.E.2d 370, 379 (Ind. Tax Ct.1997) (St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gunter v. Cabarrus County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 8, 2007

    In Reinninger v. Prestige Fabricators , Inc. , 136 N.C. … Parsons v. Pantry, Inc., supra .; Starr v. Charlotte Paper Co., Inc. , 8 N.C. App 604 , 175 S.E.2d 342 (1970).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hutchens v. Yadkin County Board of Edu.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 6, 2007

    Saums v. Raleigh Community Hospital , 346 N.C. 769 , 487 S.E.2d 746 (1997); Franklin v. Broyhill Furniture Industries , 123 N.C. App. 200 , 472 S.E.2d 382 , cert. denied , 344 N.C. 629 , 477 S.E.2d 39 (1996). … Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc ., 142 N.C. App. 259 , 545 S.E.2d 485 (2001). *Page 8 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Krol v. Indiana Board of Tax Review

    848 N.E.2d 1185 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 9, 2006

    Joseph J. and Laurel V. Krol (the Krols) appeal the final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review (Indiana Board) valuing their real property for the 2002 tax year. … Mgmt. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.