Case law

Brandon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Edu.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2010

Klein & Brown, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

59 Misc. 2d 395 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 24, 1969

(Stich v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 159 N. Y. S. 712; Haas v. Fidelity *398 & Deposit Co., 97 Misc. 4 .) … (Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co., 207 N. Y. 162 .)

Talesnick v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

756 N.E.2d 1104 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 1, 2001

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board's final determinations when the State Board acts within the seope of its authority. Wetzel Enters,, Inc. v. … Inland Steel Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 739 N.E.2d 201, 211 (Ind. *1109 Tax Ct.2000), review denied; see also Wirth v.

Graber v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

727 N.E.2d 802 · Indiana Tax Court · May 8, 2000

Ackelmire v. North Vermillion Community Sch. … See Riley at Jackson Remonstrance Group v.

William Steele & Co. v. Brown

2 Va. 246 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1821

In New York this doctrine has been explicitly recognised in the Cases of Williams v. Rogers, and Ross v. Same, 5 John. 163 ; and in Ball and Ryers, 3 Caine’s Rep. 84. … In opposition to it, the English Cases of Fieldhouse and Croft, 4 East. 510; Willows v. Ball, 5 Bos. & Pul. 376; and Knight v. Criddle, 9 East. 48, are cited in 2 Bac. Abr. 715, tit. “ Execution.”

Collings Foundation v. Stow Zoning Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Land Court · Oct 14, 2021

STOW ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, MISC 15-000369, MISC 15-000370 THE COLLINGS FOUNDATION, THE COLLINGS FOUNDATION, INC., ROBERT COLLINGS, and CAROLINE COLLINGS, Plaintiffs, v. … ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF STOW; and EDWARD TARNUZZER, CHARLES BARNEY, WILLIAM BYRON, BRUCE FLETCHER, RUTH KENNEDY SUDDUTH, MICHELLE SHOEMAKER, ANDREW J.

Buffalo & State Line Railroad v. Board of Supervisors

48 N.Y. 93 · Commission of Appeals · Sep 15, 1871

The application of that remedy, in cases of- irregular or illegal assessments, has since been affirmed, in People v. The Board of Assessors of Brooklyn ( 39 N. Y., 81 ,) and People v. The Assessors of Albany, ( 40 N. … The summons was served in this case on the clerk of the board, at the city of Buffalo. This is to be regarded as a personal service on the board.

Boshart v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

672 N.E.2d 499 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 29, 1996

Loveland (petitioners) appeal a final determination of the Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners (State Board). … That the State Board allowed input from the petitioners via the Control Board hearing does not make the petitioners a party. 5 Therefore, assuming the hearing before the State Board acting through the Control Board is an

Garcia v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

743 N.E.2d 817 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 14, 2001

To prevail, a taxpayer can demonstrate the inaccuracy of the State Board's assessment. Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233-34 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998). Discussion I. … See State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs v. Town of St.

William Steele & Co. v. Brown

2 Va. 246 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1821

In New York this doctrine has been explicitly recognised in the Cases of Williams v. Rogers, and Ross v. Same, 5 John. 163 ; and in Ball and Ryers, 3 Caine’s Rep. 84. … In opposition to it, the English Cases of Fieldhouse and Croft, 4 East. 510; Willows v. Ball, 5 Bos. & Pul. 376; and Knight v. Criddle, 9 East. 48, are cited in 2 Bac. Abr. 715, tit. “ Execution.”

William Steele & Co. v. Brown

2 Va. 246 · General Court of Virginia · Jun 15, 1821

In New York this doctrine has been explicitly recognised in the Cases of Williams v. Rogers, and Ross v. Same, 5 John. 163 ; and in Ball and Ryers, 3 Caine’s Rep. 84. … In opposition to it, the English Cases of Fieldhouse and Croft, 4 East. 510; Willows v. Ball, 5 Bos. & Pul. 376; and Knight v. Criddle, 9 East. 48, are cited in 2 Bac. Abr. 715, tit. “ Execution.”

Lydick v. State Banking Board of Texas

12 S.W.2d 954 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 23, 1929

See Edwin Lacy et al. v. State Banking Board et al., 11 S.W.(2d) 496 , recently decided on recommendation of' Section B o'f the Commission and not yet [officially] reported. … In effect, the-holding of the court in the case of Lacy v. Banking Board, supra, is against this contention.

Leehaug v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

583 N.E.2d 211 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 18, 1991

Herff Jones, Inc. v. … Brown v. Gardner (1974), 159 Ind.App. 586 , 308 N.E.2d 424, 427 (quoting Garvin v. Chadwick Realty Corp. (1987), 212 Ind. 499 , 9 N.E.2d 268, 273 ).

Young v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

5 N.J. Tax 102 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 30, 1982

[at 103, 130 A.2d 847 ; citations omitted] *108 The doctrine of merger, in terms of planning and zoning, was clearly enunciated by our Supreme Court in Loechner v. … See Hackensack Water Co. v.

Thomas v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Edu.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 6, 2010

Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). The terms of the Tort Claims Act must be strictly construed. Northwestern Distrib., Inc. v. DOT , 41 N.C. … Pulley v. Rex Hosp. , 326 N.C. 701 , 392 S.E.2d 380 (1990). 3.

Scheub v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

716 N.E.2d 638 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 22, 1999

State Board of Tax Comm’rs, 639 N.E.2d 698, 703 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994) (noting importance of proper notice by State Board when conducting sua sponte review of taxpayer’s assessment) (quoting Board of Comm’rs v. … Woolworth Co. v.

Little v. Anson County Board of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 8, 2009

Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co. , 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982). … Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc. , 143 N.C. App. 259 , 545 S.E.2d 485 (2001); Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). 4.

Boehning v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

763 N.E.2d 502 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 5, 2002

Prop. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 689 N.E.2d 1068, 1074 (Ind. … This Court will not uphold a State Board decision rejecting Taxpayers' evidence when the State Board fails to make any findings that it is inaccurate or unreliable. See Canal Square Ltd. Pirs. v.

Morris v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

712 N.E.2d 1120 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 12, 1999

Corp., 699 N.E.2d at 339; Bock Prods., Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 683 N.E.2d 1368, 1372 (Ind. Tax Ct.1997); Mahan v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 622 N.E.2d 1058, 1063 (Ind. Tax Ct.1993). … Corp., 699 N.E.2d at 342; Zakutansky v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 696 N.E.2d 494, 496 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998); see also Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1240 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998).

Hatcher v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners

561 N.E.2d 852 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 22, 1990

Faris Mailing, Inc. v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue (1990), Ind.Tax, 557 N.E.2d 713, 716 ; State ex rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court (1986), Ind., 500 N.E.2d 737, 739 . … Co. v. Indiana Dep't of Revenue (1981), Ind., 429 N.E.2d 220, 222 (citing State v. George (1980), 273 Ind. 26 , 401 N.E.2d 680 ).