Case law

Dodge v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

705 N.E.2d 1099 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 18, 1999

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. See Garcia v. … In Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 694 N.E.2d 1230 (Ind.

Poracky v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

635 N.E.2d 235 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 8, 1994

Foundry, Inc. v. … See Board of Comm'rs of Lake County v. Foster (1993), Ind.App., 614 N.E.2d 949, 950 . Thus, the Porter County assessor's challenge was untimely.

Brown v. Town of Sudbury

1 Davis. L. Ct. Cas. 227 · Massachusetts Land Court · Jun 15, 1906

Brown and Compa, are allowed to go on in their plantation and' such as are associated with them.” Colony Records, Vol. I, * Page 229. … Monumoi v. Rogers, 1 Mass. 159 ; Mitchell v. Starbuck, 10 Mass. 5 ; Bott v. Perley, 11 Mass. 169 ; Springfield v. Miller, 12 Mass. 415 ; Worcester v. Eaton, 13 Mass. 369 ; Jeffries Neck Props. v. Ipswich, 153 Mass. 42 .

Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

742 N.E.2d 46 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 8, 2001

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives the final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … The taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating the invalidity of the State Board’s final determination. Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998). Discussion I.

Zakutansky v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

696 N.E.2d 494 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 7, 1998

The State Board cannot support its findings with the unsupported subjective opinions of its hearing officers. See Canal Square, 694 N.E.2d at 808 ; see also Corey v. … See Loveless Construction Co. v.

Precedent v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

659 N.E.2d 701 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 20, 1995

STANDARD OF REVIEW "The State Board is accorded great deference when acting within the scope of its *704 authority." Wirth v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 613 N.E.2d 874, 876 . … See id.; Knauf Fiber Glass GmbH v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1994), Ind.Tax, 629 N.E.2d 959, 961 .

Lake County Board of Equalization v. Commission

3 Or. Tax 221 · Oregon Tax Court · May 17, 1968

The board of equalization reduced the assessor’s valuation to $3,356,500 and the taxpayer appealed to the tax commission, which reduced the board’s valuation to $2,755,000. … The appraiser for the assessor and the board of equalization valued the real property using a land classification system which is used on a county-wide basis.

Brown v. Revelle Builders of North Carolina, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 20, 1998

. ; Kisiah v. W.R. Kisiah Plumbing , 124 N.C. App. 72 , 476 S.E.2d 434 (1996), disc. rev. denied , 345 N.C. 343 , 483 S.E.2d 169 (1997). 3.

Brown v. Sea Park West Houses

5 Misc. 3d 224 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 25, 2004

(Maguire v New York R.T. Corp., 141 Misc 807 [Brooklyn Mun Ct 1931].) … (Catanese v Furman, 9 AD3d 863 [4th Dept 2004]; Palo v Latt, 270 AD2d 323 [2d Dept 2000].)

City of Salem v. Salem County Board

1 N.J. Tax 462 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 29, 1980

County Boards of Taxation are mandated by the legislature to complete their annual Equalization Tables by March 10th. N.J. S.A. 54:3-18. … Middlesex County Board of Taxation, 113 N.J.Super. 6, 10 , 272 A.2d 542 (App.Div. 1971); Delaware Twp. v. Neeld, 52 N.J.Super. 63, 68 , 144 A.2d 801 (App.Div. 1958).

Jones v. Alamance Board of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 16, 1995

Barnes v. Highway Comm'n , 282 N.C. 278 , 192 S.E.2d 273 (1972). … Therefore plaintiff is entitled to an award in her favor, Honeycutt v. Bess, 43 N.C.

Talesnick v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

693 N.E.2d 657 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 20, 1998

. § 6 — 1.1—15— 4 (West Supp.1997); see also Joyce Sportswear Co. v. … Like any party appealing an administrative decision, the taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating that the State Board’s final determination is improper. See Componx, Inc. v.

Pittman v. Federal Paper Board Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 4, 1995

. § 97-2 (6); Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Company , 233 N.C. 372 , 64 S.E.2d 265 (1951) (I.C. 337364). 3. Plaintiff is not entitled to benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act for the back condition at issue.

BROWN, BILLY v. THE LILLY CO. d/b/a LILLY ENVIRONMENTAL

2026 TN WC 2 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 12, 2026

. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … Limberakis v. Pro-Tech Sec., 2017 TN Wrk Comp App Bd LEXIS 53, at *9-10, (Sept. 12, 2017). Under these similar circumstances, Mr. Brown is entitled to a new panel of orthopedic physicians.

Barker v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

712 N.E.2d 563 · Indiana Tax Court · May 27, 1999

Tax Ct.1994); see also Katzson Bros. v. … Co., 695 N.E.2d at 1047, the State Board does not have the discretion to abandon the inquiry altogether. See Arkansas v.

Kemp v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

726 N.E.2d 395 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 14, 2000

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board’s final determinations when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. See Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … The taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating the invalidity of the State Board’s final determination. See Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Ind.Tax Ct.1998).

Simmons v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

642 N.E.2d 559 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 14, 1994

See Wirth v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 613 N.E.2d 874, 876 . … The State Board, however, is mistaken for two reasons. First, under the State Board's regulations, Indiana property is assessed according to its true tax value, not its market value. See Wirth v.

Hall v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

512 N.E.2d 891 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 6, 1987

Hall and Fred V. … State Board of Tax Commissioners v. South Shore Marina (1981), Ind.App., 422 N.E.2d 723 ; State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Gatling Gun Club, Inc. (1981), Ind.App., 420 N.E.2d 1324 .

Texas Mutual Life Ins. v. R. A. Brown & Co.

2 Posey 160 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 26, 1880

Pierce v. The State, 13 N. H., 536; Hiatt v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2 Dillon, 572. … Barnard knew Estelle in I860; he and his wife boarded at her house; she never saw him under the influence of liquor. She states: “ Mr.

Klein & Brown, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

59 Misc. 2d 395 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 24, 1969

(Stich v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 159 N. Y. S. 712; Haas v. Fidelity *398 & Deposit Co., 97 Misc. 4 .) … (Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co., 207 N. Y. 162 .)