Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.58s
Herb v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
656 N.E.2d 890 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 24, 1995
Additional facts will be supplied as necessary. *892 STANDARD OF REVIEW The State Board is accorded great deference when it acts within the seope of its authority. Mahan v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind. … 'The State Board has plenary authority to review and correct any errors when a taxpayer brings an appeal before the State Board." Wirth v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind. Tax, 613 N.E.2d 874, 879 .
Cited 31 timesPublishedReams v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
620 N.E.2d 758 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 18, 1993
Monarch Steel Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 611 N.E.2d 708, 713 (citing Hinshaw v. Board of Comm'rs (1993), Ind., 611 N.E.2d 637, 638 ). … Board of Dental Examiners v. Judd (1990), Ind.App., 554 N.E.2d 829, 833, n. 4 (citing Bailey v. Menzie (1987), Ind.App., 505 N.E.2d 126 ), and the court must always be able to exercise its proper role.
Cited 15 timesPublishedCorey v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
674 N.E.2d 1062 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 7, 1997
Whether the State Board applied the proper grade to the Coreys’ residence. IV. Whether the State Board determined the proper condition of the Coreys’ residence. V. … Where a taxpayer fails to meet the burden of proof that the State Board’s assessment was inaccurate, the assessment must be sustained. See Herb v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 656 N.E.2d 890, 893 (Ind.
Cited 12 timesPublishedPittman v. Federal Paper Board, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 26, 1997
Plaintiff is a 42 year old male, who for the last twenty-three and a half years has worked for defendant-employer Federal Paper Board and its successor in interest, International Paper Company.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPittman v. Federal Paper Board, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 19, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarrington v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
525 N.E.2d 360 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 28, 1988
Podgor v. Indiana Univ. (1978), 178 Ind. … Comm’n on General Educ. v. Union Township School (1980), Ind.App., 410 N.E.2d 1358, 1361 .
Cited 22 timesPublishedShaw v. Federal Paper Board Company
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 2, 1998
Cited 0 timesPublishedHalley v. Ohio Board of Nursing
99 Ohio Misc. 2d 102 · Ohio Court of Claims · May 20, 1999
Strother v. Hutchinson (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 282, 285 , 21 O.O.3d 177 , 179, 423 N.E.2d 467, 469 . … R.C. 4723.28(E) states: "The board shall investigate evidence that appears to show that any person has violated any provision of this chapter or any rule of the board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMusgrave v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
658 N.E.2d 135 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 21, 1995
See Browning, 620 N.E.2d at 31. IND.CODE 6-1.1-15-5 authorizes an appeal from a final determination of the State Board to the Tax Court. See also Marion County Bd. of Review v. … Browning v. Walters (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 28, 31 (emphasis in original) (quoting City of Marion v. Antrobus (1983), Ind.App., 448 NE.2d 325, 329).
Cited 13 timesPublishedRogers v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
565 N.E.2d 398 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 24, 1991
Did the State Board err when it placed Rogers’ formalwear in depreciation POOL NO. 2? IV. Did the State Board err in computing the true tax value of Rogers’ tuxedos? V. … DISCUSSION AND DECISION The court defers to the State Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedScheid v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
560 N.E.2d 1283 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 5, 1990
In the case of Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Holthouse Realty Corp. (1976), 170 Ind. … Tax, 552 N.E.2d 860, 862 ; Emley v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (1989), Ind. App., 586 N.E.2d 558, 560-61 ; State Board of Tax Commissioners v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedMatonovich v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
705 N.E.2d 1093 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 15, 1999
See Bowman v. State Bd. of Nursing, 663 N.E.2d 1217, 1219 (Ind.Ct.App.1996); see also Mills v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 639 N.E.2d 698, 701 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994); Johnson County Plan Comm’n v. … See State Teachers Ass’n v. Board of Sch. Comm’rs, 693 N.E.2d 972, 974 (Ind.Ct.App.1998).
Cited 16 timesPublishedVonnegut v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
672 N.E.2d 87 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 10, 1996
Moreover, as this Court explained in Bieilski v. … See Simmons v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 642 N.E.2d 559, 561-62 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994); Western Select Properties v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 639 N.E.2d 1068, 1074 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994).
Cited 14 timesPublishedHatcher v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
601 N.E.2d 19 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 19, 1992
This court first addressed the assessment of the Hatchers' property in Hatcher v. … Bailey Seed Farms, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1989), Ind.Tax, 542 N.E.2d 1389, 1391 (citing Porter's South Shore Cleaners v. State (1987), Ind.Tax, 512 N.E.2d 895, 898 ).
Cited 13 timesPublishedBell v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
651 N.E.2d 816 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 14, 1995
Auburn Foundry, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1994), Ind.Tax, 628 N.E.2d 1260, 1263 (citations omitted); Miller v. Gibson County Solid Waste Management District (1993), Ind.Tax, 622 N.E.2d 248, 259-260 . … Johnson v. Tipton Community School Corp. (1970), 253 Ind. 460, 464 , 255 N.E.2d 92, 94 (citations omitted).
Cited 9 timesPublishedCastello v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
638 N.E.2d 1362 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 15, 1994
Comm. v. Indiana Bell Tel. Co. (1955), 235 Ind. 1 , 130 N.E.2d 467 ; Oliverius at 54 , 294 N.E.2d at 651 citing Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 ; Doran v. Board of Educ. of W. … The State Board has the primary responsibility to assess the property taxes imposed by the legislature. Bielski v. Zorn (1994), Ind.Tax, 627 N.E.2d 880 . The State Board is Indiana's "property tax expert." Miller v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGarcia v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
694 N.E.2d 794 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 24, 1998
ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives the final determinations of the State Board great deference *796 when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. Indiana Sugars, Inc. v. … See Corey v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 674 N.E.2d 1062, 1066 (Ind. Tax Ct.1997). The State Board’s regulations define the different characteristics that help assessors differentiate between grades.
Cited 18 timesPublishedZakutansky v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
691 N.E.2d 1365 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 13, 1998
Vonnegut v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 672 N.E.2d 87, 89 (Ind.Tax Ct.1996), review denied. … and duty to act. 672 N.E.2d at 89 -90 (citing Bielski v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedMills v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
639 N.E.2d 698 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 7, 1994
Downing v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1971), 149 Ind.App. 687, 691 , 274 N.E.2d 542, 544-45 . … Board of Comm'rs v. Western Electric Co. (1926), 198 Ind. 417, 422 , 153 N.E. 177, 178 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedDodge v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
705 N.E.2d 1099 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 18, 1999
ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives final determinations of the State Board great deference when the State Board acts within the scope of its authority. See Garcia v. … In Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 694 N.E.2d 1230 (Ind.
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna