Case law

Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc. v. Balwani

115 Misc. 2d 948 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 1, 1982

Co-op Corp. v Edwards, 133 Misc 831 ; Esplanade Gardens v Reed, NYLJ, May 9, 1979, p 13, col 3; Brigham Park Coop Apts, v Lieberman, Sec. 4, 158 NYS2d 135; Susskind v 1136 Tenants Corp., 43 Misc 2d 588 ). … (Harar Realty Corp. v Michlin & Hill, 86 AD2d 182 .)

Austin v. Township of Pemberton

25 N.J. Tax 362 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 28, 2010

See Pipquarryco, Inc. v. Borough of Hamburg, 15 N.J.Tax 413, 418 (Tax 1996). … In VSH Realty, Inc. v. Township of Harding, 291 N.J.Super. 295 , 677 A.2d 274 (App.Div.1996), the taxpayer filed a petition with the Morris County Board of Taxation challenging an assessment on commercial property.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2007

Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc. , 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980). As the Supreme Court of New Mexico observed in State, ex rel . Gonzales v. … Campbell v. Campbell , 450 P.2d 203 , 205 (Okla. 1966).

KEAN, CARMA v McROCKET, LLC, d/b/a GREAT CLIPS,

2025 TN WC 56 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 12, 2025

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).  Here, Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 68-302 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 13, 1968

Tharel v. Board of County Com'rs of Creek County, 188 Okl. 184 , 107 P.2d 542 , determines the answer to your first question. … We feel that it is appropriate — though not necessary in answering your specific questions to call your attention to certain dicta in the case of Headley v.

Opinion No. 76-365 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1976

It appears from the foregoing authorities that such matters as raised in your opinion request rest in the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners as authorized by the authority vested in the Board by statute. … In the Supreme Court case of City of McAlester, et al. v. State ex rel.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

THE STATUTORY DUTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE COOPERATIVE IS MORE LIKE THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION. … A CASE SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION POSED IS SCHOENBAUM V. ORANGE COUNTY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS.

Colligan v. McKernan

2 Dem. Sur. 421 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1884

That such evidence is sufficient is also déclared in the following cases : Jackson v. Le Grange (19 Johns., 386 ); Dan v. Brown (4 Cow., 483 ); Jackson v. Betts (6 Cow., 377 ); Chapman v. … Rodgers (12 Hun, 347 ); Helyar v. Helyar (1 Lee's Cases, 472); Brown v. Brown (8 Ellis & Black., 876); Havard v. Davis ( 2 Binn., 406 ) ; Graham v. O’Fallon ( 3 Mo., 507 ); Dickey v. Malechi ( 6 Mo., 177 ); Kearns v.

Passaic Street Realty Assoc., Inc. v. Garfield City

13 N.J. Tax 482 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 2, 1993

Reading these cases together with Hackensack Water v. Woodcliff Lake, 9 N.J.Tax 545 (Tax 1988) and Abe Schrader v. Secaucus, 8 N.J.Tax 390 (Tax 1986), as well as F.M.C. Stores v. … Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Closter, supra. *488 2.

Lallo, Ralph v Marion Environmental, Inc.

2015 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 4, 2015

Conner, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board, in which Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9-10 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).

Opinion No. 80-191 (1981) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 1981

Hedges et al. v. Groom, 194 Okl. 384 , 151 P.2d 936 (1944). … Stemmons Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., Okl., 301 P.2d 212 (1956).

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979

Dear President Duncan, The Attorney General has received your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May the State Board of Barber Examiners waive any of the requirements found in 59 O.S … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (Okla. 1968). It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1994

GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY V. STATE, 645 P.2D 1011 (OKLA.1982). IN ADDITION, CONSTRUCTION THAT WOULD LEAD TO AN ABSURDITY MUST BE AVOIDED AND A RATIONALE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE EMPLOYED. LEDBETTER V. … TAYLOR V.

Reeves, Octaivian v. Aramark Services, Inc.

2025 TN WC App. 53 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 7, 2025

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Octaivian D. … Wallis v. Brainerd Baptist Church, 509 S.W.3d 886, 895 (Tenn. 2016).

Opinion No. 74-143 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1975

Cox v. Dillingham, 184 P.2d 976 , (1947) and McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 30 P.2d 213 (1959). … In State v.

Johnson, Saeeda v. AIMBRIDGE HOSPITATLITY

2025 TN WC 69 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 20, 2025

Id. § 50-6-204(b)(1); Barron v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., 184 S.W.3d 219, 223 (Tenn. 2006). Further, any alleged noncompliance does not affect her right to future treatment. LeMaire v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC, No. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1990

See McMahan v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 285 P. 953 (Okla. 1930). ¶ 3 The answer to your question is governed by the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act. … Texas Oklahoma Express v.

In re the Estate of Wade

120 Misc. 480 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1923

Southgate v. Continental Trust Co., 74 App. Div. 150 ; affd., 176 N. Y. 588 . Under the language of the will and codicil there is no ambiguity, and extrinsic evidence should not have been considered. Brown v. … Reynolds v. Reynolds, 224 N. Y. 429 ; Matter of Fowles, 222 id. 222; Brown y. Quintard, supra. Nor is it necessary to apply the rule of construction as to legacies by implication. The referee erred in his conclusion.

Opinion No. 69-183 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 5, 1969

We have checked other provisions of law and find no authority for the county or its governing board, the Board of County Commissioners, to expend county funds for the purpose of building a retention dam for a non-profit water … In the case of Allen V.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1979

A member of a board of education of an independent school district has long been regarded as a public office or a position of public trust. Gibson v. Crowder, 196 Okla. 406 , 165 P.2d 628 (1946); see also Op. Att'y. … Edmondson v. State ex rel. Phelps, 533 P.2d 604 , 616 , (Okla. 1975). Under the language of Gibson v.