Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1979

    If the school board voted to allow the media to attend the meeting, would the board be liable if the press were in attendance at the meeting and reported the proceedings? … Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc., Okla. 584 P.2d 1336 (1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell v. State

    140 Misc. 2d 778 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1988

    Board of Bar Examiners (Ct Cl, Oct. 16, 1986, Benza, J.). … Co. v State of New York, 131 Misc 2d 357 ; Castro v Board of Bar Examiners, Ct Cl, Oct. 16, 1986, Benza, J., supra) would deny liability for even ministerial errors arising out of the exercise of purely governmental functions

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1971

    Vance, 35 P.2d 896 (Okl. 1934); Wilson v. Moran, 197 P. 1051 (Okl. 1921). Or, stated differently, he who asserts an affirmative has the burden of proving it. Trademen's National Bank of Oklahoma City v. … The case of Cupps, Appellee v. City of Toledo, et al., Appellants, 18 Ohio Opinions 2nd Series 82 (Ohio 1961) arrives at the same conclusion under like reasoning.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-301 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978

    Railroad Company v. State, 119 P. 117 (1911). Statutes must be reasonably and sensibly construed in preference to construction which renders all or part of the statutes useless. Tannehill v. … It is also apparent that with the authority vested in said Board by the Legislature, by virtue of 82 O.S. 934 [82-934](c), it is incumbent upon the Board to take action when it discovers that pollution abatement programs

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BARNES, EDWIN v. ELECTROLUX

    2025 TN WC 94 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 23, 2025

    As the Appeals Board has stated, “[P]arties and their lawyers cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their arguments.” Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. … Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *29 (Jan. 30, 2018).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-123 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 1969

    In the case of Hewitt v. … Also in Connally v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-246 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1970

    That is to say, Chase v. … Both Murray v. State, supra, and Chase v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Alexis

    14 Misc. 3d 379 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 8, 2006

    Co. v Arzillo, 98 AD2d 495 [1984]; Grayes v DiStasio, 166 AD2d 261 [1990]). … (Matter of Brown, 132 Misc 2d 171, 172-173 [1986].) The court went on to direct that the funds be held in escrow pending finalization of the judgment of murder.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-165 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1971

    In Boardman v. … In addition, the case of Boardman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • COX, BRIAN v. LOWE’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    2026 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 21, 2026

    Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., 2018 Tenn. LEXIS 8, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Jan. 18, 2018). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Duffy

    2 Gibb. Surr. 254 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1896

    Moore v. Moore, 3 Abb. Ct. App. … Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ; Boss v. Hardin, 79 id. 84; Lynn v. Smith, 35 Hun, 275 ; Collyer v. Collyer, 115 N. Y. 442 . The circumstances of this case do not rebut the implication of an agreement to pay.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Appeal of the Town of Montclair v. Kimberly School

    25 N.J. Misc. 165 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 28, 1947

    Justice Perskie in Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals , 127 N. J. L. 105; 21 Atl. … Trenton v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, surpa; Dwight School of Englewood, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • JAIRO NOE MORALES VILLAREAL v. HANDYMAN HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC

    2026 TN WC 86 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 18, 2026

    Shepherd v. Haren Const. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Thus, the Court cannot order temporary disability benefits at this time. Given Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • HERNANDEZ, RICARDO v. CARLOS LOPEZ, d/b/a EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE

    2025 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 19, 2025

    Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). While Mr. Hernandez suffered a severe and disabling injury, he did not present an opinion from Dr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-288 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1975

    Hisel v. State, Okl., 264 P.2d 375 (1953). In McVicker v. … In Tobin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cuozzo v. Krumsiek

    Massachusetts Land Court · Jul 1, 2021

    See Holmes v. Guinen, 23 LCR 496 , 499 (2015) (Foster, J.); Planning Bd. of Springfield v. Board of Appeals of Springfield, 355 Mass. 460 , 462 (1969). … Guiragossian v. Board of Appeals of Watertown, 21 Mass. App. Ct. 111 , 116 (1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of Brown

    133 Misc. 457 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1929

    (See Matter of Brown, 131 Misc. 859 .) Decedent’s widow, Agnes Greene Brown, is the sole executrix of decedent’s estate and is the petitioner herein. … (Parsons v. Lyman, 20 N. Y. 103 ; Moultrie v. Hunt, 23 id. 394; Cross v. U. S. T. Co., 131 id. 330, 339.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 2001

    The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled that the powers of a school board are like those of a municipal corporation ( see Joint Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. … In Way v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kitchner v. State

    82 Misc. 2d 858 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1975

    The former section provides for a review of Referees’ decisions by an appeal board; the latter section provides for review of the appeal board’s decision by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. … In finding the decision-making procedure of a branch of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to have been judicial in nature the court in Lipton v Friedman ( 2 Misc 2d 165 ) set forth the following criteria as guidelines to be

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-078 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1980

    Carl v. Board of Regents, supra at 914. … As expressed in Carl v. Board of Regents, supra, and Sanders v. Benton, supra, it is clear that the Open Meeting Act requirements apply to such an association.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.