Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.96s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1979
If the school board voted to allow the media to attend the meeting, would the board be liable if the press were in attendance at the meeting and reported the proceedings? … Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc., Okla. 584 P.2d 1336 (1978).
Cited 0 timesPublished140 Misc. 2d 778 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1988
Board of Bar Examiners (Ct Cl, Oct. 16, 1986, Benza, J.). … Co. v State of New York, 131 Misc 2d 357 ; Castro v Board of Bar Examiners, Ct Cl, Oct. 16, 1986, Benza, J., supra) would deny liability for even ministerial errors arising out of the exercise of purely governmental functions
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1971
Vance, 35 P.2d 896 (Okl. 1934); Wilson v. Moran, 197 P. 1051 (Okl. 1921). Or, stated differently, he who asserts an affirmative has the burden of proving it. Trademen's National Bank of Oklahoma City v. … The case of Cupps, Appellee v. City of Toledo, et al., Appellants, 18 Ohio Opinions 2nd Series 82 (Ohio 1961) arrives at the same conclusion under like reasoning.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978
Railroad Company v. State, 119 P. 117 (1911). Statutes must be reasonably and sensibly construed in preference to construction which renders all or part of the statutes useless. Tannehill v. … It is also apparent that with the authority vested in said Board by the Legislature, by virtue of 82 O.S. 934 [82-934](c), it is incumbent upon the Board to take action when it discovers that pollution abatement programs
Cited 0 timesPublished2025 TN WC 94 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 23, 2025
As the Appeals Board has stated, “[P]arties and their lawyers cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their arguments.” Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. … Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *29 (Jan. 30, 2018).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 1969
In the case of Hewitt v. … Also in Connally v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1970
That is to say, Chase v. … Both Murray v. State, supra, and Chase v.
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Misc. 3d 379 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 8, 2006
Co. v Arzillo, 98 AD2d 495 [1984]; Grayes v DiStasio, 166 AD2d 261 [1990]). … (Matter of Brown, 132 Misc 2d 171, 172-173 [1986].) The court went on to direct that the funds be held in escrow pending finalization of the judgment of murder.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1971
In Boardman v. … In addition, the case of Boardman v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCOX, BRIAN v. LOWE’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION
2026 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 21, 2026
Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., 2018 Tenn. LEXIS 8, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Jan. 18, 2018). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Duffy
2 Gibb. Surr. 254 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1896
Moore v. Moore, 3 Abb. Ct. App. … Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ; Boss v. Hardin, 79 id. 84; Lynn v. Smith, 35 Hun, 275 ; Collyer v. Collyer, 115 N. Y. 442 . The circumstances of this case do not rebut the implication of an agreement to pay.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAppeal of the Town of Montclair v. Kimberly School
25 N.J. Misc. 165 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 28, 1947
Justice Perskie in Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals , 127 N. J. L. 105; 21 Atl. … Trenton v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, surpa; Dwight School of Englewood, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJAIRO NOE MORALES VILLAREAL v. HANDYMAN HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC
2026 TN WC 86 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 18, 2026
Shepherd v. Haren Const. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Thus, the Court cannot order temporary disability benefits at this time. Given Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHERNANDEZ, RICARDO v. CARLOS LOPEZ, d/b/a EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE
2025 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 19, 2025
Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). While Mr. Hernandez suffered a severe and disabling injury, he did not present an opinion from Dr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1975
Hisel v. State, Okl., 264 P.2d 375 (1953). In McVicker v. … In Tobin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMassachusetts Land Court · Jul 1, 2021
See Holmes v. Guinen, 23 LCR 496 , 499 (2015) (Foster, J.); Planning Bd. of Springfield v. Board of Appeals of Springfield, 355 Mass. 460 , 462 (1969). … Guiragossian v. Board of Appeals of Watertown, 21 Mass. App. Ct. 111 , 116 (1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of Brown
133 Misc. 457 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1929
(See Matter of Brown, 131 Misc. 859 .) Decedent’s widow, Agnes Greene Brown, is the sole executrix of decedent’s estate and is the petitioner herein. … (Parsons v. Lyman, 20 N. Y. 103 ; Moultrie v. Hunt, 23 id. 394; Cross v. U. S. T. Co., 131 id. 330, 339.)
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 2001
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled that the powers of a school board are like those of a municipal corporation ( see Joint Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. … In Way v.
Cited 0 timesPublished82 Misc. 2d 858 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1975
The former section provides for a review of Referees’ decisions by an appeal board; the latter section provides for review of the appeal board’s decision by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. … In finding the decision-making procedure of a branch of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to have been judicial in nature the court in Lipton v Friedman ( 2 Misc 2d 165 ) set forth the following criteria as guidelines to be
Cited 9 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1980
Carl v. Board of Regents, supra at 914. … As expressed in Carl v. Board of Regents, supra, and Sanders v. Benton, supra, it is clear that the Open Meeting Act requirements apply to such an association.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna