Case law

Opinion No. 72-162 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1972

Home-Stake Production Company v. Board of Equalization of Seminole County, Okl., 416 P.2d 917 (1966). … City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 (10th Cir. 1948). Accordingly, the cases in Oklahoma have consistently adhered to the rule set forth in Tulsa Exposition Fair Corporation v.

Opinion No. 71-275 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1971

An officer under 51 O.S. 6 [ 51-6 ] (1961), was defined in Sparks v. … Jur. 880 ; Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 .

Drovdahl, Chad v. City of Bristol, Tennessee

2016 TN WC 50 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2016

.: 2015-02-0143 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 3062-2015 ) City of Bristol, Tennessee, … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review

Opinion No. 75-155 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 7, 1975

the board? … These opinions espouse the intent of 21 O.S. 481 [ 21-481 ] (1971) et seq. as stated in Reddell v. State, 14 Okl. Cr. 199 , 170 P. 273 (1918), wherein the Court said: ". . .

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1986

Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries Auth ., 498 P.2d 1395 , 1398 (Okla. 1972). … Board whereby the County Board has assumed responsibility for the city or town's waste, and (3) the agreement authorizes the County Board to exercise such authority.

In re the Accounting of Seaman

194 Misc. 224 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 3, 1949

(Mullarky v. Sullivan, 136 N. Y. 227 .) … Y. 607 ; Bowditch v. Ayrault, 138 id. 222; Pray v. Hegeman, 98 id. 351; Matter of Schley, 202 App. Div. 169 ; affd. 234 N.

Bell v. State

140 Misc. 2d 778 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1988

Board of Bar Examiners (Ct Cl, Oct. 16, 1986, Benza, J.). … Co. v State of New York, 131 Misc 2d 357 ; Castro v Board of Bar Examiners, Ct Cl, Oct. 16, 1986, Benza, J., supra) would deny liability for even ministerial errors arising out of the exercise of purely governmental functions

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Duffy

2 Gibb. Surr. 254 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1896

Moore v. Moore, 3 Abb. Ct. App. … Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ; Boss v. Hardin, 79 id. 84; Lynn v. Smith, 35 Hun, 275 ; Collyer v. Collyer, 115 N. Y. 442 . The circumstances of this case do not rebut the implication of an agreement to pay.

Dzierson v. Dzierson

173 Misc. 2d 490 · New York Family Court · Jun 26, 1997

(Radin v Radin, 209 AD2d 396 , citing Alice C. v Bernard G.C., 193 AD2d 97, 109 .) … (Alice C. v Bernard G.C., 193 AD2d, at 109 .)

Opinion No. 71-165 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1971

In Boardman v. … In addition, the case of Boardman v.

Pollack v. Perry

235 S.W. 541 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 14, 1921

In Thomas Martin v. Mary Ann Surman, 116 Ill. … Hamilton v. Feary, 8 Ind. App. 615 , 85 N. E. 48 , 52 Am. St. Rep. 485 ; Reams v. Taylor, 31 Utah, 288 , 87 Pac. 1089 , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439, 120 Am. St. Rep. 930 , 11 Ann. Cas. 51; Bianchi v.

Opinion No. 79-356 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1980

Woods v. Board of Equalization, Okla., 517 P.2d 430 (1973); Bretts v. Commissioner of Land Office, 17 Okla. 64 , 110 P. 766 (1910). … The Supreme Court in Woods v. State Board of Equalization, supra, expressly held that federal revenue sharing funds were subject to the state's appropriation process.

Opinion No. 71-446 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1972

As stated by the court in Allen v. … Board of Commissioners of Pittsburg County, 28 Okl. 773 , 116 P. 175 : "It is a settled rule that the grants of powers to boards of county commissioners must be strictly construed, because when acting under special authority

Bloxsom v. Choquette

2021 NCBC 57 · North Carolina Business Court · Sep 15, 2021

Bloxsom v. Choquette, 2021 NCBC 57. … Williams v. Peabody, 217 N.C. App. 1, 5 (2011) (quoting State ex rel. Tucker v.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 1998

¶ 1 Your questions deal with the authority of the Oklahoma Crime Victims Compensation Board ("the Victims Board") to expend money. … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980) (citations omitted). ¶ 4 Your first question asks whether there are any limitations on the use of monies collected pursuant to the Act.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Cushman

16 Mills Surr. 389 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1916

This was a case where the defendant gave to the plaintiff the following paper to induce the plaintiff to loan to Delos Brown and Joseph Brown, who were indebted to the defendant, the sum of $400, viz., “ Mr. … Hadcock: The Browns are good for what money you let them have.” Signed, “ D. Osmer.”

People v. Kern

67 Misc. 2d 495 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 25, 1971

Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 [1968].) The three Court of Appeals cases in our cycle of six make the pattern unmistakable. In People v. … In People v. Brown (28 N Y 2d 282 [1971]) the police received a report of a robbery committed by use of a car.

Ward v. State

81 Misc. 2d 583 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1975

Co., 248 NY 339 ; McGlone v Angus, *587 Inc. 248 NY 197 ; Schubart v Hotel Astor, 168 Misc 431 , affd 255 App Div 1012 , affd 281 NY 597 ; Klein v Hoffman, 15 AD2d 899 , affd 12 NY2d 850 ; Brown v American Mfg. … (Payne v City of New York, supra; Wildman v Board of Educ., City of N.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1992

V. FORTINBERRY CO., 207 P.2D 301, 304 (OKLA. 1949). … UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 2 O.S. 96 , THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY FREE FAIR BOARDS OR ASSOCIATIONS, WHILE HAVING THE AUTHORITY TO "EXPEND FUNDS OF THE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION," ARE ADMONISHED THAT "IN NO CASE SHALL THE

Opinion No. 71-281 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1971

BOARD OF PHARMACY — RETAIL DRUGSTORE LICENSE FEES The Board of Pharmacy of the State of Oklahoma is not required to issue a regular retail drugstore license to federal, state, county and city welfare departments; to federal … State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, Okl., 286 P.2d 1088 .