Case law

Lajeunesse v. School Board

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 231 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Aug 13, 1985

The School Board’s obligation is to educate Ricky in an appropriate therapeutic environment, not to provide primary treatment for the handicap itself. Cohen v. … Even under Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education, 105 S.

J. S. Brown & Co. v. Young

1 Tex. L. R. 469 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 15, 1882

This statute underwent judicial construction on this point in the case of Winnie v. … (Gillian v. Henderson, 12 Texas, 47 .) And the holder of a lien, it seems, if endangered by the levy, should invoke the equitable powers of the court by an original proceeding. (Belt v. Raquet, 27 Texas, 472 .)

Lewin v. Law Offices of Godfrey G. Brown

8 Misc. 3d 622 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 16, 2005

(See Klein Calderoni & Santucci, LLP v Bazerjian, 6 Misc 3d 1032[A] , 2005 NY Slip Op 50274[U] [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2005]; Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum & D’Errico v Ronan, 195 Misc 2d 704 [Nassau Dist Ct 2003].) … (Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 285 AD2d 587, 588 [2d Dept 2001]; see also Markard v Markard, 263 AD2d 470 [2d Dept 1999].) It follows, then, that the same rule should apply here.

Brown v. S and N Communications, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 13, 1995

Frederick Weidman, III, David Ugland, and Coy Brown, Melissa Sue Garland and Wayne Newkirk; the stipulated medical reports of Drs. … Russell v. Lowe's Products Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 462 S.E.2d 454 (1993). There is no presumption of disability from the mere fact that wages have not been earned. As the Supreme Court stated in Hendrix v.

School Board v. Arnold

36 Fla. Supp. 2d 225 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Feb 3, 1989

Arnold was employed a total of twelve years by the School Board. 10. During her employment by the School Board, Ms. … IX, Section 4(b), Constitution of Florida; Sections 230.03(2), 230.22, 230.23(4) - (5), 230.35 and 231.36(5), Florida Statutes; and Tolar v School Board of Liberty County, 363 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Damron v. School Board

9 Fla. Supp. 2d 185 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Sep 26, 1984

Springdale School District v. Grace, 494 F.Supp. 266, 272 (1980). … Stuart v. Nappi, 443 F.Supp. 1235, 1241 (1978).

Brown, Billy v. Lilly Environmental dba The Lilly Co.

2026 TN WC App. 20 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 13, 2026

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Billy Brown Docket No. 2023-02-8932 v. … Roberto, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the employee-appellee, Billy Brown Memorandum Opinion 1 On November 17, 2023, Billy Brown (“Employee”) was driving a forklift within the course

117 Republic Ltd. Partnership v. Brown Township Assessor

851 N.E.2d 399 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 27, 2006

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations (and orders) of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. See Wittenberg Lutheran Vill Emdowment Corp. v. … The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003).

J. S. Brown & Co. v. Young

1 White & W. 712 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 3, 1881

In Winnie v. … [Rogers v. Nichols, 20 Tex. 719 ; Story on Part. § 264.] October 3, 1881. Affirmed.

C. R. Johns & Co. v. Brown

1 White & W. 568 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 23, 1881

The cases cited by appellant, viz.: Clay v. Smith, 3 Peters, 412 , and Van Hook v. Whitlock, 26 Wend. 43 , are essentially different from this case. … [Powell v. Haley, 28 Tex. 52 ; Peeler v. Guilkey, 27 Tex. 355 ; Berry v. Donley, 26 Tex. 737 ; Hardy v. De Leon, 5 Tex. 211 .]

Flint, Chamberlain & Graham v. McCarty & Brown

1 White & W. 570 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 23, 1881

[Wade v. Roberts, 53 Ga. 26 .] The affidavit in this case does not purport to be the sworn declaration of any individual, but the declaration of a firm. … McCarty & Brown appear before the officer, and the affidavit is signed McCarty & Brown.

Chemical Bank New York Trust Co. v. Brown

63 Misc. 2d 341 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 4, 1970

The conclusion so ably urged upon this court is that the doctrine and reasoning set forth in Matter of Sumitomo Shoji v. Chemical Bank N. Y. … The case of Matter of Sumitomo Shoji v. Chemical Bank N. Y.

Torain v. Alamance Municipal Abc Board

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 24, 2011

Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 , 167 , 265 S.E.2d 389 , 391 (1980). … Holley v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 , 232 , 581 S.E.2d 750 , 753 (2003) (internal citations omitted). 3.

Brown v. Western North Ca. Comm. Health Servs.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 2, 2010

Harrell v. Harriet Henderson Yarns , 314 N.C. 566 , 336 S.E.2d 47 (1985); Starr v. Charlotte Paper Co. , 8 N.C. App. 604 , 612 , 175 S.E.2d 342 , 347 (1970). 3. … Stat. § 97-29 (2008); Russell v. Lowes Prod. Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). 7. Defendants defended this claim with reasonable grounds. N.C. Gen.

Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

694 N.E.2d 1230 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 24, 1998

The State Board may not simply refuse to consider the taxpayer’s evidence. See Conti v. … See Mahan v.

Reams v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

620 N.E.2d 758 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 18, 1993

Monarch Steel Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1993), Ind.Tax, 611 N.E.2d 708, 713 (citing Hinshaw v. Board of Comm'rs (1993), Ind., 611 N.E.2d 637, 638 ). … Board of Dental Examiners v. Judd (1990), Ind.App., 554 N.E.2d 829, 833, n. 4 (citing Bailey v. Menzie (1987), Ind.App., 505 N.E.2d 126 ), and the court must always be able to exercise its proper role.

Wirth v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

613 N.E.2d 874 · Indiana Tax Court · May 4, 1993

Whether the State Board abused its discretion in assessing the ratio of use between "general office" and "general retail." V. … State Board of Tax Commissioners v.

Harrington v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

525 N.E.2d 360 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 28, 1988

Podgor v. Indiana Univ. (1978), 178 Ind. … Comm’n on General Educ. v. Union Township School (1980), Ind.App., 410 N.E.2d 1358, 1361 .

Hugh N. Brown, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

3 Or. Tax 481 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 21, 1969

In Charles Laughton v. … The Oregon Board of Pilot Commissioners is authorized to fix their fees at rates not less than those prescribed by ORS 776.115.

Lee v. Federal Paper Board Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 14, 2002

Plaintiff, who is fifty-four years old and a high school graduate, began working for Federal Paper Board's predecessor in February 1967.