Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.88s
Jones v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 000753a (or.tax 7-8-2008)
Oregon Tax Court · Jul 8, 2008
Achiro v. Comm'r , 1981 WL 11333 , 77 TC 881(1981), n 26, citing Klein v. Board of Supervisors , 282 US 19 , 24 (1930). … The Oregon Tax Court in Brown and McAlpin v. Department of Revenue (Brown ), 3 OTR 481 (1969) concluded that two corporations could be "recognized as separate business entities for tax purposes." Brown at 491.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1980
Wallace v. … Indeed, Section 34 provides that the State Board shall maintain separate accounts not only for each municipality, but also for "each firefighter". Moran v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSaravia, Eduardo David v. Brent Vineyard
2023 TN WC 4 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 2, 2023
Smiley v. Four Seasons Coach Leasing, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *10-11 (July 15, 2016). However, the Appeals Board emphasized the importance of the right to control the conduct of the work. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978
McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968). … See Hampton v. Ewert, 22 F.2d 81 , cert. den. 48 S.Ct. 303 , 276 U.S. 623 (1972), and more recently in Boydston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1989
Hughes Drilling Co. v. … Although the Board is not authorized to budget monies generally appropriated to the DAC, the Board does have the right and duty to communicate its recommendations regarding the Board's administrative needs to the DAC.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSchizophrenia Foundation v. Montgomery Township
4 N.J. Tax 662 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 21, 1982
Accord, Shelton College v. Ringwood, 48 N.J.Super. 10 , 136 A.2d 660 (App.Div.1957). Similarly, in Grace & Peace Fellowship Church v. … The court in Shelton College v.
Reversed by Schizophrenia Foundation v. Township of Montgomery, 6 N.J. Tax 439 (1984)Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1974
EXECUTIVE SESSION — SCHOOL BOARD The provisions of 25 O.S. 201 [ 25-201 ] (1971) prohibit a board of education from discussing student disciplinary matters or conducting student disciplinary hearings in executive session. … Our research reveals no decisions requiring school board meetings considering student disciplinary matters to be conducted in executive session. The recent case of Canney v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2018 TN WC 151 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 20, 2018
Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2017). She has the burden of proof on all essential elements of her claim. Scott v. … Absent an appeal to the Appeals Board, this order shall become final in thirty days. 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 1976
Groves v. … (p. 1042) A board of education being a public office (Barnhill v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1979
Article V , Section 57 ? … See Caldwell v. Oldfield, 98 P. 925 and Caldwell v. Hooker, 98 P. 964 ."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1971
Vance, 35 P.2d 896 (Okl. 1934); Wilson v. Moran, 197 P. 1051 (Okl. 1921). Or, stated differently, he who asserts an affirmative has the burden of proving it. Trademen's National Bank of Oklahoma City v. … The case of Cupps, Appellee v. City of Toledo, et al., Appellants, 18 Ohio Opinions 2nd Series 82 (Ohio 1961) arrives at the same conclusion under like reasoning.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 420 · Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court · Jul 1, 1747
[Admiralty Papers, V, 109] At a Court of Vice Admiralty held at Newport In the Colony of Rhode Island on the Seventh Day of September A. D. 1747. … Accordingly the Court was adjourned untill further Notice [Admiralty Papers, V, 133]
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1992
YORK V. TURPIN, 681 P.2D 763 (OKLA. 1984). … WESTINGHOUSE V. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, 720 P.2D 713, 718 (OKLA. 1986).
Cited 0 timesPublished711 A.2d 1113 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1998
In Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1968
Arkansas Amusement Corporation v. Kempner, 182 Ark. 897 , 33 S.W.2d 42 ;Morgan v. Tennessee Valley Authority, C.C A. Tenn., 115 F.2d 990 ; Tucker v. State, 218 Ind. 614 , 35 N.E.2d 270 . … Crable v. Carter, 187 Okl. 421 , 103 P.2d 518 ; Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635 , 56 A.L.R. 706 ; Giss v. Jordan, 82 Ariz. 152 , 309 P.2d 779 , 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law, Section 130.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1977
Bogert, The Law of Trusts, Section 92, page 331 (5th Ed. 1973); Morville v. Fowle, 144 Mass. 109 , 10 N.E. 766 ; In Re Johnson, D.C. Okl., 518 F.2d 246 (1975) . … Williamson v. Evans, Okl. Cr., 319 P.2d 1112 (1957).
Cited 0 timesPublished81 Misc. 2d 583 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1975
Co., 248 NY 339 ; McGlone v Angus, *587 Inc. 248 NY 197 ; Schubart v Hotel Astor, 168 Misc 431 , affd 255 App Div 1012 , affd 281 NY 597 ; Klein v Hoffman, 15 AD2d 899 , affd 12 NY2d 850 ; Brown v American Mfg. … (Payne v City of New York, supra; Wildman v Board of Educ., City of N.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 2002
The parameters under which public trusts may operate was explained in Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1955). … The court relied on its earlier opinion in Excise Board of Stephens County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of New Brunswick v. Columbian Building Corp.
18 N.J. Misc. 414 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 7, 1940
E. v. City of Hoboken (State Board), filed February 21st, 1939, affirmed, Hoboken v. Hoboken Lodge No. 74, B. P. O. E. (Supreme Court, 1939), 123 N. J. L. 506; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 783. … Fifty-Six Seminary Avenue Corp. v. City of Rahway (State Board), filed April 4th, 1939.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 1970
See Reubin v. … Co. v. Board of Education, 83 Okl. 12 , 200 P. 171 (1921). Indeed, we relied on the Atlas Life case significantly in our earlier opinions.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna