Case law

In Re Fischer

657 A.2d 535 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1995

The Respondent failed to render a decision in a timely manner with regard to nineteen Petitions for Termination of Parental Rights brought before the Court as identified in the Complaint of the Judicial Conduct Board (Board … The Respondent is subject to disciplinary sanctions under Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 5.

Opinion No. 49-0727 Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 1949

OPINION — AG — ** STATE BUILDING — STATE BOARD OF REGENTS — UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS ** AS THE TIME OF SENATE BILL NO. 99 THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, AS CONTRACTING AGENT, HAD SEVERAL BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THE … (REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, CONSTRUCTION, LEGISLATION) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, 74 O.S. 63 [ 74-63 ], 70 O.S. 1916 [70-1916] 70 O.S. 1916 .8 [70-1916.8], OPINION NO. JUNE 6, 1949 — DOYLE (FRED HANSEN)

Opinion No. 80-164 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1980

Your question contemplates the powers granted to the Board of Electrology and specifically inquires as to the Board's power to regulate and restrict the location of an electrologist's practice. … The Board of Electrology as an administrative board of the State, may exercise those powers which have been expressly or impliedly conferred upon it by statute. See W. S. Pickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Inv.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2000

See Dyer v. Dalton, 174 P.2d 252 (Okla. 1946). Subsections D and E of Section 2876 of Title 68 allow a taxpayer an opportunity to file a complaint if the taxpayer disputes an assessor's action. … The boards' authority is found at 68 O.S. 2863 (B) (1999), which provides: "It shall be the duty of the boards and they shall have the authority to: "1.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1980

The Retirement and Pension Board of the Department of Public Safety, Okl., 603 P.2d 758 (1979). The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled, in Adams v. … Sneed v. Sneed, Okl., 585 P.2d 1363 (1978).

Williams v. Bladen Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 17, 2003

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 2002

The parameters under which public trusts may operate was explained in Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1955). … The court relied on its earlier opinion in Excise Board of Stephens County v.

Bumgarner, Brent v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

2022 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 2, 2022

The Appeals Board explained that this provision means that “in circumstances where an employee is noncompliant with medical treatment, compensation shall be held in abeyance, not terminated.” Newell v. … See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Hudson, Michelle v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, LLC

2024 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 5, 2024

In Marshall v. Mueller Company, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Thompson v. Kent State University

36 Ohio Misc. 2d 16 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1987

Brown, J. This action came on to be heard on May 19, 1986, on the issue of liability only. … Brown, J., retired, of the Coshocton County Court of Common Pleas, sitting by assignment.

Opinion No. (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1978

This was noted by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Company v. State Board of Equalization, 174 Okl. 320 , 49 P.2d 1089 (1935) and Sinclair Prairie Oil Company v. … In so ruling, the Court viewed that the duty to establish a method of valuation is with the State Board of Equalization and it is within the discretion of said Board to determine such a method.

Chavez, Raul Morelos v. Jesus Morelos Chavez

2023 TN WC App. 20 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 12, 2023

Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015).

Drovdahl, Chad v. City of Bristol, Tennessee

2016 TN WC 50 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2016

.: 2015-02-0143 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 3062-2015 ) City of Bristol, Tennessee, … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review

Jackson v. Edmondson

151 S.W.2d 794 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1941

Co. v. Harris et al., 127 Tex. 13 , 89 S.W.2d 973, 975 ; Southland Greyhound Lines v. Cotten, 126 *795 Tex. 596 , 91 S.W.2d 326 ; Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. … Richardson, 126 Tex. 82 , 95 S.W.2d 956 ; Tarry Warehouse & Storage Co. v. Duvall, 131 Tex. 466 , 115 S.W.2d 401 .

In re the Estate of Kearney

169 Misc. 947 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 23, 1939

Y. 247, 255 ; Matter of Tamargo, supra; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75, 85 ; People’s Trust Co. v. Flynn, 188 id. 385, 393; Matter of Gosden, 158 Misc. 99 .) … Brown devolves as intestate property. (Matter of Tamargo, supra; Matter of Hartmannsgrubber, 146 Misc. 87 ; Beekman v. Bonsor, supra; Kerr v. Dougherty, 79 N. Y. 327, 346 ; Morton v.

Lane, Sandra v. REBO LIGHTING & ELECTRONICS, LLC

2025 TN WC 6 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 18, 2025

In Carrillo v. Hurtado, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

In re the Last Will & Testament & Codicils of Bertuch

132 Misc. 731 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 4, 1928

Neither did a similar situation exist in the decision in Reid v. Brown ( 54 Misc. 481, 482 ). … Having in mind that it is my duty and the duty of the courts to carry out the wishes of the testator, I have my doubts as to the applicability of the decisions in Matter of Cole and Reid v.

Rucker, Jr., Willie v. Federal Express Corporation

2023 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 3, 2023

Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015).

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001

of the State Board of Agriculture. … Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 , 276 (Okla. 1996) (footnote omitted). ¶ 4 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.

Lee v. Wake County

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 17, 2003

and to make a recommendation to that board. 6. … Corp. v. Cty. of Durham, supra; L S Leasing, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem, supra. 9.