Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.81s

  • Juliano v. State

    190 Misc. 180 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1947

    (Shaknis v. State of New York, supra; Arthur W. Brown v. State of New York, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 691, affd. 271 App. Div. 811 ; Burt I. Brown v. State of New York, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 691, affd. 271 App. Div. 811 .) … State of New York, supra; Brown v. State of New York [two cases], supra.)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1977

    ELECTIONS A secretary of a county election board is a county rather than a state officer. … Blankenship v. Atoka County, Okl., 456 P.2d 537 (1969), the Oklahoma Supreme Court viewed the assistant district attorney as a state officer for payroll purposes only and a county officer for all other purposes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BDB Enterprises, LLC v. Brick Township

    16 N.J. Tax 22 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 18, 1996

    Inwood Owners, supra at 490 , 524 A.2d 441 (citing Schneider v. … Bernstein v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Stackpoole

    9 Cow. 419 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1827

    From the testimony of Brown and Bokee, it appears to have been the subject of dispute between the respondent and Baker. … Hillyer v. Vaughn, 1 J. J. Marsh, 583. Hanmer’s adm’rs. v. Rochester, 2 id. 145 . Burke’s adm’rs v. Albert, 4 id. 97 . Bacon v. Brown, 1 Bibb, 324 , Post 746, 773-777.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Health Tea Corp. v. Dante

    132 Misc. 2d 772 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 17, 1986

    Freedman, Civil Court Judge, in a joint trial of Health Tea Corp. v Carter (L&T index No. 94255/81) and Health Tea Corp. v Pames (L&T 20931/82). … (See, NY City Loft Board Regs [Relating to Subletting, Subdivision, and Assignment] § C [2].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huffaker, Jack T. v. CAC of Knox County

    2021 TN WC 193 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 24, 2021

    Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Trkula

    699 A.2d 3 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1997

    The Judicial Conduct Board is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging conduct proscribed by that section on the part of judges, justices or justices … The Board charges that the making of the aforesaid false statements subjects Respondent to discipline under Article V, § 18(d)(1) *11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution because that conduct constitutes: 1. such that brings

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-152 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1973

    And in Dunn v. Tyler Independent School District, 327 F. … In James v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shannon, Jared v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    2015 TN WC App. 45 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 3, 2015

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Jared Shannon ) Docket No. 2015-06-0052 ) v. … WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Jared Shannon ) Docket No. 2015-06-0052 ) v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975

    In Galuan v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 452 P.2d 930 , the Court sets forth the basic distinction between licensing and registration. … And, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Boydston v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2004

    See, e.g., Ingram v. Chappell, 260 P. 20 , (syllabus) (Okla. 1927); 8 Phi Kappa Psi v. State, 53 P.2d 1130 (Okla. 1936) (this proceeding was brought by the tax ferret); State v. … Conner v. Drummond, 46 P.2d 447 , 448 (Okla. 1935).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-368 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1968

    the proper election board. … Hampton v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 (1955).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borough of Little Ferry v. T. J. Sokol Ass'n

    19 N.J. Misc. 264 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 18, 1941

    Respondent justifies the action of the Bergen County Board as proper under R. … Fifty-Six Seminary Avenue Corp. v. City of Rahway, New Jersey Tax Reports 1934-1939, p. 666.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Sacred Heart of Jesus English Rite Catholic Church

    178 Misc. 2d 851 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 21, 1998

    (People’s Bank v St. Anthony’s R. C. … (Malerba v Friars Minor, supra, at 443; see also, Karsch v Pottier & Stymus Mfg. & Improvement Co., 82 App Div 230, 233 [1st Dept 1903].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oliva v. Baird

    Massachusetts Land Court · Jul 2, 2021

    , Inc. v. … See Wheatley v. Planning Board of Hingham, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 435 , 450-451 (1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-313 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1968

    Brickell v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 362 , 221 P.2d 785 (1950), Carlile v. Nat. Oil and Development Company, 83 Okl. 217 , 201 P. 377 (1921). … Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kansas v. Howell, 123 F.2d 50 (10th Cir. 1941).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 1992

    IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS A DUTY TO PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE TO MEMBERS OF COUNTY FAIR BOARDS, WE MUST DETERMINE WHETHER BOARD MEMBERS ARE COUNTY OFFICERS. … THE ANALYSIS IN THAT OPINION WHICH SUPPORTED THE CONCLUSION THAT THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF A COUNTY FREE FAIR ASSOCIATION WAS A PUBLIC OFFICE CONSIDERED THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Myers

    203 Misc. 549 · New York Family Court · Feb 18, 1953

    (People v. Turner, 277 App. Div. 317 , 319-320.) … The respondent failed to furnish such proof to the board of education, and the board of education was therefore justified in filing the petition in this court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Reeve v. Thompson

    Massachusetts Land Court · May 20, 2021

    Tebo v. Board of Appeals of Shrewsbury, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 618 , 624 (1986). See also Miles v. Planning Bd. of Millbury, 29 Mass. App. … Center, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-063 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1980

    In Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. … Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.