Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.09s
140 Misc. 535 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 16, 1931
(Matter of Brown, 212 App. Div. 677 ; affd., 240 N. Y. 646 .) … (See, also, Carmardella v. Schwartz, 126 App. Div. 334, 336 ; Youngs v. Goodman, 240 N. Y. 470, 473 ; Matter of Brown, 212 App. Div. 677, 679 .)
Cited 20 timesPublished108 Misc. 2d 664 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 24, 1981
The principal question presented is whether the State has waived its sovereign immunity with regard to a claim alleging that the State Division of Human Rights (Division) and the Human Rights Appeal Board (Appeal Board) violated … That determination was affirmed by the Appeal Board and subsequently confirmed by the Appellate Division, First Department (Rabinovici v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 78 AD2d 597 , mot for lv to app den 52 NY2d 704 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1975
In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … In Gibson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1968
In Board of Education of Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. S. J. … In Board of Education of Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. S. J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2002
Coll. v. … Dist. v. Wis.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1993
CITING FARLEY V. … CLEARLY THEN, THESE FUNDS ARE PUBLIC IN NATURE, OLUSTEE CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1984
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CITY OF CLINTON — 53 A.2D 790 ', ' FLETCHER V. FEENEY — 400 A.2D 1084 ', ' LEONE V. BREWER — 184 N.E. 111 ', ' MICHAELS V. … TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP — 67 A.2D 324 ', ' STATE EX REL KRAMER V. SCHWARTZ — 82 S.W.2d 63 ', ' NUCHOLLS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1971
Co. v. Colvert, 100 P.2d 1005 , 1008 (Okl. 1940) stated: "The word employed by the legislature deposit has a definite meaning. . ." and goes on to quote 7 Am. … Having been either designated by statute or appointed by a board of education, a treasurer of a school district is the agent of the school board or board of education.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1996
Austin Western Road Machinery Company v. … It is well established in Oklahoma that the board of county commissioners "has general control over the property and finances of the county." Cavin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished83 N.Y.S. 977 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1903
Brown v. Mount, 54 App. Div. 605 , 66 N. Y. Supp. 1000 . The objections made to various disbursements by the executrix are directed principally to those expenses of administration created by the executrix. … Garfield v. Kirk, 65 Barb. 468 ; Gross v. Moore, 14 App. Div. 356 , 43 N. Y. Supp. 945 .
Cited 1 timesPublished2025 TN WC 19 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 17, 2025
Rucker v. Fed’l Express Corp., 2024 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *8 (Feb. 12, 2024). Instead, Mr. Tate must present medical evidence to establish a causal relationship. Cloyd v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished66 Misc. 2d 44 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 18, 1971
by the Board or by interested parties before the Board, and held by the Board to be invalid. … Co. v. Stewart, 248 U. S. 446 ; Georgia Fla. & Ala. Ry. v. Blish Co., supra ; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. Martin, supra ; St. Louis, I. Mt. & So. Ry. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 2007
We begin by noting that the State Board of Corrections ("Board") is not a constitutionally created board, but a creation of statute. … The Legislature is restricted from limiting the powers of constitutional boards . Bd. of Regents v. Baker , 638 P.2d 464 , 466 (Okla. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedVanguard Pai Lung, LLC v. Moody
2019 NCBC 38 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 19, 2019
Vanguard Pai Lung, LLC v. Moody, 2019 NCBC 38. … Delaware law, a controlling stockholder is one who exercises actual control over the board).
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1989
Article II , Section 3 . ¶ 14 In Bridges v. … Cartwright v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1977
Haskell v. Houston, 21 Okl. 782 , 79 P. 92 (1908). Moreover, nothing appears in the Constitution which would remove the Governor from the rule laid down in Shaw v. … The decision in Russell Petroleum Company v. Walker, 162 Okl. 216 , 19 P.2d 582 (1933), is directly on point.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1971
See Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okla., 398 P.2d 827 . … In Rhine v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChristian Asset Management Corp. v. City of East Orange
19 N.J. Tax 469 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 11, 2001
Otelsberg v. Bloomfield, Tp., 18 N.J.Tax, 243, 249 (Tax 1999). … Muscarelle Inc. v. Saddle Brook Tp., 14 N J.
Cited 11 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1970
See Alias v. City of Tulsa, Okl., 408 P.2d 517 (1965); Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, Okl., 416 P.2d 860 (1966). … Sanchez v. Melvin, Okl., 418 P.2d 639 (1966); Taff v. State, Okl., 425 P.2d 970 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975
' awarded by the board of education? … The applicable rule is stated in the second paragraph of the syllabus by the court in City of Tulsa v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna