Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.82s
120 Misc. 2d 202 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 25, 1983
Preauthorized draft systems are often imposed by cooperatives and condominium boards for financial reasons. … generally, Garrison Apts. v Sabourin, 113 Misc 2d 674 ).
Cited 3 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Zemp Behenna
2026 OK AG 8 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2026
Deputy Sheriff's F.O.P., Lodge 188 v. Bd. of Cnty. … The Jail Trust is overseen by nine trustees: One Board member, the Oklahoma County Sheriff, one appointee by each of the three Board members, and four appointees chosen by a majority vote of the Board. Id. , art. VII.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMerritt, Kenneth v. Flextronics, Inc.
2022 TN WC 31 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 4, 2022
In Watson v. Catlett Constr., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Likewise, in Meier v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew Jersey Transit Corp. v. Somerville Borough
13 N.J. Tax 339 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 27, 1993
Co. v. … Turnpike Authority appealed judgments of the Middlesex County Board of Taxation denying its claim of tax exemption); Rutgers v.
Cited 4 timesPublished2018 NCBC 133 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 21, 2018
See Williams v. Chaney, 792 S.E.2d 207, 210 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016); In re Board of Comm’rs, 4 N.C. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1973
The role of the State Board of Education is revealed by the following language: "After review of the matter the State Board of Education shall issue its decision either confirming the action of the local board of education … See Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal, et al. v. Vineyard, et al., 143 P.2d 610 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeas, Anthony v. Opus Inspection, Inc., et al.
2016 TN WC App. 15 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 30, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Anthony Leas ) Docket No. 2015-05-0415 ) v. … Buchanan v. Carlex Glass, No. 2015-01-0012, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 29, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJersey City v. State Tax Commissioner
21 N.J. Misc. 36 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 19, 1943
In an opinion filed on November 4th, 1942, in the case of Jersey City v. William D. … that this Board must conclude its hearings on or before the fifteenth day of October following the filing of the complaint.” *38 It is the opinion of this Board that this appeal should have been heard and the hearing concluded
Cited 1 timesPublishedRedmon, Wetonia v. Dr. Daniel Jefferson Barnes
2023 TN WC 55 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 7, 2023
The Appeals Board determined the hazard was sufficient to make the injury non-idiopathic. Id. … In McCaffery, the Appeals Board confirmed that an injury may “arise out of” employment if an employment hazard either caused the accident or aggravated the injury. The Appeals Board held it was the fact that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 2, 2008
Adam Brown saw plaintiff for an independent medical evaluation. Dr. … In Reinninger v. Prestige Fabricators , Inc. , 136 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthlake Indiana LLC v. Lake County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Dec 8, 2020
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Sedd Realty Co., 125 N.E.3d 676, 680 (Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1975
Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 62 P.2d 94 (1936); Sparks v. Board of Library Trustees of Carter County, 169 P.2d 201 (1946). … In Book v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1975
constitutes an equivalent, recompense, or remuneration and the term clearly connotes something given in return for services rendered as distinct from a gift, bonus or other form of gratuitous or voluntary payment, Mathews v. … Board of Education of the Town of Eruington, 106 A.2d 346 (N.J. 1954), and State v. Sheldon, 111 N.W. 372 (Neb. 1907).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOlde Lafayette Village, Ltd. v. Township of Lafayette
9 N.J. Tax 562 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 24, 1988
Co. v. … See Schierstead v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedGoodman, Robert v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC
2022 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 28, 2022
See Moore & Seiferth v. Ingles Markets, Inc., No. 2015-02-0193, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 54, at *4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Nov. 4, 2015). … Yarbrough v. Protective Servs. Co., Inc., No. 2015-08-0574, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 25, 2016); see also Burnette v. WestRock, No. 2016-01-0670, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp.
Cited 0 timesPublished181 Misc. 2d 284 · New York Court of Claims · May 21, 1999
(Freda v Board of Educ., 224 AD2d 360, 361 .) … Corp. v State of New York, 293 NY 634, 639 ; see, also, Bayer v Board of Educ., 58 Misc 2d 259, 261 , supra.)
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn re Accounting of Bank of New York
187 Misc. 45 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 21, 1946
(Rasquin v. Hamersley, 152 App. Div. 522, 527 , affd. 208 N. Y. 630 ; Matter of Union Trust Co., 170 App. Div. 176 , mod. sub nom. Matter of Union Trust Co. [Detmold], 219 N. Y. 537 ; Brown v. Tanz, 176 App. … . *50 The court believes it appropriate, in passing, to comment on Soper v. Brown ( 136 N. Y. 244 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1968
for such action and an opportunity for the teacher to appear before such board and be heard on the question of reconsideration of such action by the board. . . ." … Moral Insurance Co. v. Cooksey, Okl. 285 P.2d 223 . State ex rel. v. Zabloudil, 206 Okl. 286 , 242 P.2d 710 . However, under the facts given in your inquiry, the teacher has not "served three years."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 3, 1968
We do not find any Oklahoma cases which define "executive session" but such phrase is defined in the case of Matter of Blum v. Board of Zoning and Appeals, 1 Misc.2d 668 , 149 N.Y.S. 2d 5 , and in the case of Thomas v. … of the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDentspa v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 070891c (or.tax 3-21-2008)
Oregon Tax Court · Mar 21, 2008
of property tax appeals (Board), Plaintiff failed to allege facts showing that it first filed with the Board, and Plaintiff did not allege facts showing good and sufficient cause for the failure to do so. … At that point, the time for petitioning the Board had long passed. In LB5, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna