Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.18s
Leas, Anthony v. Opus Inspection, Inc., et al.
2016 TN WC App. 15 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 30, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Anthony Leas ) Docket No. 2015-05-0415 ) v. … Buchanan v. Carlex Glass, No. 2015-01-0012, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 29, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoffman, Lindsey v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee d/b/a Tristar Summit Medical Center
2025 TN WC 90 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 11, 2025
Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2025); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If HCA satisfies that burden, then Ms. … Inds., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 28, 1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRedmon, Wetonia v. Dr. Daniel Jefferson Barnes
2023 TN WC 55 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 7, 2023
The Appeals Board determined the hazard was sufficient to make the injury non-idiopathic. Id. … In McCaffery, the Appeals Board confirmed that an injury may “arise out of” employment if an employment hazard either caused the accident or aggravated the injury. The Appeals Board held it was the fact that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 2, 2008
Adam Brown saw plaintiff for an independent medical evaluation. Dr. … In Reinninger v. Prestige Fabricators , Inc. , 136 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthlake Indiana LLC v. Lake County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Dec 8, 2020
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Sedd Realty Co., 125 N.E.3d 676, 680 (Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCosey, Marcus v. Jarden Corporation
2018 TN WC 147 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 17, 2018
Inds., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. … Burnette v. K-Mart Corp., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 2, at *6 (Jan. 20, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Zemp Behenna
2026 OK AG 8 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2026
Deputy Sheriff's F.O.P., Lodge 188 v. Bd. of Cnty. … The Jail Trust is overseen by nine trustees: One Board member, the Oklahoma County Sheriff, one appointee by each of the three Board members, and four appointees chosen by a majority vote of the Board. Id. , art. VII.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1975
Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 62 P.2d 94 (1936); Sparks v. Board of Library Trustees of Carter County, 169 P.2d 201 (1946). … In Book v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGoodman, Robert v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC
2022 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 28, 2022
See Moore & Seiferth v. Ingles Markets, Inc., No. 2015-02-0193, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 54, at *4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Nov. 4, 2015). … Yarbrough v. Protective Servs. Co., Inc., No. 2015-08-0574, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 25, 2016); see also Burnette v. WestRock, No. 2016-01-0670, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1992
ACCORDING TO YOUR LETTER, A NONPROFIT OKLAHOMA CORPORATION HAS ASKED THE OKLAHOMA BOARD OF PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS (BOARD) TO EXEMPT IT FROM THE BOARD'S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT IS A TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION UNDER … V. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, 620 P.2D 452 (OKLA. CT. APP. 1979). STATUTES DEALING WITH THE SAME GENERAL SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TOGETHER IN ORDER TO ARRIVE AT THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN ANY PARTICULAR SECTION. TWA V.
Cited 0 timesPublished181 Misc. 2d 284 · New York Court of Claims · May 21, 1999
(Freda v Board of Educ., 224 AD2d 360, 361 .) … Corp. v State of New York, 293 NY 634, 639 ; see, also, Bayer v Board of Educ., 58 Misc 2d 259, 261 , supra.)
Cited 3 timesPublished747 A.2d 980 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2000
The Judicial Conduct Board (“Board”) is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution to file formal charges alleging ethical misconduct on the part of judges, justices, or justices of the peace and to present … Price v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedIn re Accounting of Bank of New York
187 Misc. 45 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 21, 1946
(Rasquin v. Hamersley, 152 App. Div. 522, 527 , affd. 208 N. Y. 630 ; Matter of Union Trust Co., 170 App. Div. 176 , mod. sub nom. Matter of Union Trust Co. [Detmold], 219 N. Y. 537 ; Brown v. Tanz, 176 App. … . *50 The court believes it appropriate, in passing, to comment on Soper v. Brown ( 136 N. Y. 244 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 1981
Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County v. Alexander, 171 Okl. 288 , 42 P.2d 884 (1935). … County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1968
for such action and an opportunity for the teacher to appear before such board and be heard on the question of reconsideration of such action by the board. . . ." … Moral Insurance Co. v. Cooksey, Okl. 285 P.2d 223 . State ex rel. v. Zabloudil, 206 Okl. 286 , 242 P.2d 710 . However, under the facts given in your inquiry, the teacher has not "served three years."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 3, 1968
We do not find any Oklahoma cases which define "executive session" but such phrase is defined in the case of Matter of Blum v. Board of Zoning and Appeals, 1 Misc.2d 668 , 149 N.Y.S. 2d 5 , and in the case of Thomas v. … of the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992
SUMMEY V. TISDALE, 658 P.2D 464, 468 (OKLA.1982). SEE ALSO 19 O.S. 180 .65. … V. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 438 P.2D 484 (OKLA.1968). IN ADAIR COUNTY, THE COURT WAS ASKED TO RESOLVE A BUDGET DISPUTE BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Accounting of Howell
205 Misc. 420 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 25, 1954
Div. 759 ; Frankenberger v. Schneller, 258 N. Y. 270, 273 ; Culross v. Gibbons, 130 N. Y. 447, 453, 454 ; Matter of Finch, 81 N. Y. … (See, also, Bayreuther v. Reinisch, 264 App. Div. 138 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedROMERO, MAURICIO v. JOACHIN MAGDIEL
2025 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 22, 2025
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To determine whether Mr. … Smiley v. Four Seasons Coach Leasing, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *10-11 (July 15, 2016). However, the Appeals Board emphasized the importance of the right to control the conduct of the work.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWHITSON, FREDERICK v. EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS
2026 TN WC 55 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 4, 2026
Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2025); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Express Employment meets this burden, Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna