Case law

Opinion No. 76-257 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1976

Concerning that language of Article XXIII, Section 10, the Court in Coyle v. … It is clear from the foregoing, that the Court in Coyle v.

Reazkallah,, Maikel v. ABM Industries, Inc.

2018 TN WC 184 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 19, 2018

To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

Marcoux v. Prim

2004 NCBC 5 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 16, 2004

Marcoux v. … The Board’s Activities {85} The Board was not required to conduct an auction. Barker v. Amsted Ind., 567 A.2d 1279 (Del. 1989). The Board tested the market before executing the Merger Agreement.

Melevoi v. Yang

120 Misc. 2d 982 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 2, 1983

(Sipko v Ongarito, NYLJ, March 5, 1976, p 9, col 1.) … Assoc. v Benjamin ( 108 Misc 2d 251 ).

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 2004

of Examiners in Optometry ("Board"). … State Bd. of Embalmers Funeral Dir. v. Guardian Funeral Home, 429 P.2d 732 , 736 (Okla. 1967) (quoting Moore v.

Larson v. Department of Revenue

6 Or. Tax 454 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 14, 1976

It follows that failure to give timely notice would not invalidate the assessment, but such failure does extend the time for appeal to the county board of equalization. … Oregon City v. Hartke, 240 Or 35, 44 , 400 P2d 255, 260 (1965); Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Galloway, 168 Or 85, 107-108 , 121 P2d 469, 477-478 (1942). The defendant’s Order No. VL 75-632 is affirmed.

Sherwood Village Cooperative A, Inc. v. Slovik

134 Misc. 2d 922 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 18, 1986

"B” v Pescador (NYLJ, Feb. 26, 1986, at 14, col 5) the respondent tenant sought and obtained approval from the cooperative board to reside with his fiancée. … "B” v Pescador, NYLJ, Feb. 26, 1986, at 14, col 5; Mainstay Coop. Section Two v Hroch, 105 AD2d 695 .

In re the Estate of Carney

73 Misc. 2d 579 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 12, 1973

The essential elements of a valid trust of personal property are stated in Brown v. Spohr ( 180 N. … Browne, 295 N. Y. 184 ).

In re the Estate of Cudahy

49 Misc. 2d 668 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 25, 1966

This is a proceeding by the executrix to determine the validity and enforcibility of a claim of the *670 Board of Public Welfare of Nassau County against the estate in the total amount of $4,143.48, for payments made by it … S. 2d 62; Whalen v. Downs, 10 A D 2d 148). In addition, the court is not in a position without an accounting to pass upon the question of whether or not this estate is insolvent.

Fair Lawn Borough v. Blue Hill Associates

3 N.J. Tax 55 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 2, 1981

In Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. … In Houman v.

City of Asbury Park v. Salvation Army

26 N.J. Misc. 170 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 23, 1948

Upon the subsequent amendment of the charter, the property of the Order was held to be exempt by the State Board of Taxes and Assessment in Sea Isle City v. Sisters of The Order of St. Dominic, N. J. … None of the remaining reasons urged by the appellant sets forth any ground for reversal of the County Board’s action.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1995

TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964 (Okla. 1992). … TWA v. McKinley, 749 P.2d 108 (Okla. 1988). ¶ 4 The Oklahoma Legislature has specifically provided that no person may serve more than two full terms as a board member. 65 O.S.Supp. 1994, § 4-103[ 65-4-103 ] (b).

Sanders, Andrea v. TJX Co., Inc.

2024 TN WC 42 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 24, 2024

Sanders must show she would likely prevail at trial. 2 Wilson v. Randstad, Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *15 (Dec. 19, 2022). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

White, Randy v. Boles Trucking

2016 TN WC App. 63 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 14, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Randy White ) Docket No. 2016-04-0074 ) v. … order or by memorandum opinion, whichever the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or complex.”

Opinion No. 69-290 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 1969

Co. v. Ferguson Inv. … In the case of Boydston v.

Jones, William v. Transforce, Inc.

2024 TN WC 28 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 5, 2024

Code Ann. § 50-6-102(12) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Estate of Stewart v. Jersey City

21 N.J. Misc. 149 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 17, 1943

Finnegan v. Jersey City, decided by this Board April 21st, 1942. Conceding this to be true, petitioner is not assessed on the value of decedent’s leasehold. … Household Finance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1937), 119 N. J. L. 230; 196 Atl. Rep. 219 ; Household Finance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1941), 126 N. J. L. 399; 19 Atl.

Opinion No. 77-208 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1978

Johnson v. Ward, 541 P.2d 182 (Okl., 1975). A plain reading of these statutes reveals that the district attorney can give opinions, advice, and provide defense services only to county officers and employees. … In an analogous case, Board of County Commissioners v.

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1985

Schooler v. Lisle , 299 S.W.2d 792 (Ky. 1957); Solomon v. North Shore Sanitary District , 269 N.E.2d 457 (Ill. 1971). … In Arthur v.

Opinion No. 74-101 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1974

In general, the adoption of a code does not have an altering or repealing effect upon existing laws: As stated in Bussett v. … The opinion cites Ratliff v.