Case law

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1986

Absent a rule setting out the procedure to be used by the Board to change a beneficial use designation to a lower designation because of a mistake, the Board may not make such a change. See, Adams v. … At such time as the Board properly adopts such a rule or regulation, the Board may change a beneficial use designation to a less stringent one to correct a factual error. V .

In Re Whittaker

948 A.2d 279 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 2008

Another Supreme Court case, Lambert v. … Price v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1990

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHOCTAW NATION V. CRAYTOR, 600 P.2D 314 (OKL. 1979). … ELIMINATION/SUPERVISION OF THE BOARD.

Burks v. Neutzler

2 S.W.2d 416 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 15, 1928

Brown, on or about the 9th day of November, A. … Kilgore et al. v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Soc. (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 473 .

Opinion No. 75-255 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1975

The applicable rule of statutory construction is stated in Shriver v. Graham, Okl. … Hedges v. Groom, 194 Okl. 384 , 151 P.2d 936 (1944). It is evident that an individual who meets statutory qualifications would be otherwise eligible to compete for the position.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2003

Porter v. Ferrell, 959 P.2d 576 , 578 (Okla. 1998); Maltsberger v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 987 P.2d 437 , 438 (Okla.Ct.App. 1999)), it does not always have this meaning. See Davis v. GHS Health Maint. … McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998).

Eubanks v. Galveston, H. &. S. A. Ry. Co.

59 S.W.2d 825 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 3, 1933

Dunbar v. Dunbar, 190 U. S. 340 , 23 S. Ct. 757 , 47 L. Ed. 1084 ; Pollack v. Pollack (Tex. Com. App.) 46 S.W.(2d) 292 . … Dunbar v. Dunbar, supra; Pollack v. Pollack, supra.

McGinnis, Barbara v. Range Line Discount Deli

2021 TN WC 168 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 26, 2021

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). While Ms. … See Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Opinion No. 68-282 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1968

In the case of Benson v. Department of Labor, 180 Wn. 655 , 41 P.2d 404 , the Washington court held that those hired by an authorized agent of the county and compensated by county funds are county employees. … In Chavez v. Sprague, 209 C.A.2d 101, 25 Cal.Rptr. 603 , the California court held that a volunteer member of a county hospital staff is a county employee for the purposes of being immune from suit by indigent patients.

Glancy v. Department of Revenue

12 Or. Tax 117 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 23, 1991

Appeals of valuation issues begin with the board of equalization. ORS 309.100. … Rothenfluch v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 322 (1990), vac’d on other grounds, 312 Or 1 , 815 P2d 698 (1991).

Opinion No. (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1969

In the case of City of Phoenix v. … For other cases adhering to the same general rule, see Hanson v. Hoffman, C.C.A. Okla. 1940, 113 F.2d 780 ; Thompson v. Board of Education, 57 N.J.L. 628 , 31 A. 168 ; Ex parte Beck, D.C. 245 F. 967 ; Kirby Lbr. Co. v.

Opinion No. 78-111 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1978

Midwest City v. Harris, Okl., 561 P.2d 1357 (1977). That intent is ascertained from an examination of the language of the act as a whole in light of its general purpose and object. Adams v. … Johnson v. Ward, Okl., 541 P.2d 182 (1975). Different legislative enactments dealing with the same subject must be construed together as a harmonious whole so as to give effect to each. Johnson v. Ward, supra.

Sharpe v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association

1968 Okl Jud. 1 · Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1968

Garner v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles, 341 U.S. 716 , 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 (1951) ; Adler v. … Board of Education, etc., 342 U.S. 485 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 (1952); Beilan v. Board of Public Education, etc., 357 U.S. 399 , 78 S.Ct. 1317 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1414 (1958); Keyishian v.

Teltsher v. City of Orange

7 N.J. Tax 287 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 22, 1985

Prospect Hill Apts. v. … Mitchell v. Alfred Hofmann, Inc., 48 N.J.Super. 396, 405 , 137 A.2d 569 (App.Div.), certif. den. 26 N.J. 303 , 139 A.2d 589 (1958); accord Country Chevrolet v.

Elkhart County Assessor v. E R Carpenter Company, Inc.

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 12, 2021

Assessor v. Sedd Realty Co., 125 N.E.3d 676, 680-81 (Ind. … Tax Ct. 2019); Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1235 (Ind.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1998

Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, 92 P.2d 837 , 840-41 (Okla. 1939). ¶ 5 Cloudman was affirmed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Independent School District No. 8 of Seiling v. … Rural Water District No. 3, Pushmataha County v.

Jamil v. Southridge Cooperative, Section 4, Inc.

93 Misc. 2d 383 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 17, 1978

(Smith v Baillie, 44 NYS2d 217 , 220; Hanson v Ontario Mill Producers Co-op., 58 Misc 2d 138 .) … Co-op. v Wolman, 13 Misc 2d 753 ; Vernon Manor Co-op. Apts. v Salatino, 15 Misc 2d 491 .)

Howard, Yolanda v. Unum

2015 TN WC 106 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 27, 2015

.: 2015-01-0005 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 84357-2014 Unum, ) Employer, … Howard filed a Notice of Appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board on March 18, 2015. The Appeals Board affirmed the denial of benefits by order issued April 8, 2015.

In Re Davis

954 A.2d 118 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · May 14, 2008

This action is taken pursuant to the authority of the Board under Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania which grants authority to the Board to determine whether there is probable cause to … Anthony, 504 Pa. 551, 558 , 475 A.2d 1303, 1307 (1984), see also Commonwealth v. Rosado, 418 Pa.Super. 196 , 613 A.2d 1244 (1992), aff'd, 545 Pa. 4 , 679 A.2d 756 (1996), Commonwealth v.

In re the Estate of Wagner

101 Misc. 2d 967 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 7, 1979

Smoake v Morrow, 58 Misc 2d 266, 268 ; see, also, Fisch, New York Evidence [2d ed], § 1063). … It appears from the information before the court at this time that the county board of representatives, not the hospital’s board of managers has the authority to accept and administer gifts of this kind.