Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

4.74s

  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1975

    In the case of Perma-Stone Oklahoma City Company v. … In the case of Realty Mortgage and Sales Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hewitt v. State

    27 Misc. 2d 930 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 29, 1960

    Brown to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 100± acres, deed recorded in Liber 1235 of Deeds at page 214 on September 2, 1956. … Y. 628 [1892]; Matter of Municipal Housing Auth. of City of Utica v. Rosenblum, 271 App. Div. 184 [1946]; Curley v. Jersey City, 83 N. J. L. 760 [1912]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sutton v. Weeks

    5 Redf. 353 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1882

    But while the amount of the penalty of the bond is large enough, the surety Brown, is insufficient. … When the bond was executed, Brown could and did justify in more than the amount of its penalty ; but he has since met with reverses, *357 and is nob now worth over §8,000, and that is not enough.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1985

    McGowan v. Maryland , 366 U.S. 420 , 425-426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961). To answer your question we must examine the history behind Okla. Const. … Article VI , Section 31a in the case of Board of Regents, Okla. A. M. Col. v. Oklahoma State Regents , 497 P.2d 1062 (Okla. 1972).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dobbs, Janet v. Dale-Cole Transport, Inc.

    2016 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2016

    COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS TENNESSEE JANET DOBBS, ) Claimant, ) Docket No. 2015-08-0174 ) v. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1997

    Thomas v. Oklahoma Orthopedic and Arthritis Foundation, 903 P.2d 279 , 284 (Okla. 1995). ¶ 3 Subsections (A) and (B)(1) of 59 O.S. … Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Law Enforcement Commission, 764 P.2d 172 , 179 (Okla. 1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Frankenthaler

    1 Misc. 2d 194 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 24, 1955

    In the Lehmaier case the court stressed the fact that the testator dealt with his executors as his estate representatives and that he expected them to act as a board of executors and not as individuals. … A quite similar situation was before this court in Matter of Brown (122 N. Y. S. 2d 640) where there also was an explicit attempt to create a trust but an omission of the essential trust provisions.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1998

    Poulous v. … Poulous v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-183 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

    In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-262 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

    Burger v. Richards, Okl., 380 P.2d 687 ; Polk v. Oklahoma Alcohol Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 . … See Toole v. Michigan State Board of Dentistry, 11 N.W.2d 229 ; and Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . In the case of Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U.S. 425 , 71 L.Ed. 331 , 47 S.Ct. 122 , citing as authority Dent v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Suraci v. Mucktar

    187 Misc. 2d 848 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 23, 2000

    A finding of noncompliance by the Loft Board is not “a prerequisite to a determination of noncompliance by a court.” (County Dollar Corp. v Douglas, 161 AD2d 370, 371 [1st Dept 1990].) … (See Dundee Equity Corp. v Johnston, 103 AD2d 692, 693 [1st Dept 1984]; Baxter v Captain Crow Mgt., 128 Misc 2d 254, 261, 263-264 [Sup Ct, NY County 1985].) II.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Winderlea Wine Co. v. Yamhill Cty. Assess., Tc-Md 110229n (or.tax 9-15-2011)

    Oregon Tax Court · Sep 15, 2011

    Plaintiff appealed to the county board of property tax appeals (board) and the board sustained the penalty. (Ptf's Compl at 2, Mar 28, 2011.) … Yamhill County Assessor and Dept. of Rev. , TC-MD No 041156B (Nov 16, 2005); Pacific Coast Investments v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School Dist.

    141 Tex. 224 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 7, 1943

    In State v. Chicago, R. I. & G. R. … McPhail v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Sandahl v. Department of Revenue

    9 Or. Tax 251 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 18, 1982

    See Swenson v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 234, 238 (1975).) … The clerk of the court will consult with the parties to establish an acceptable date for trial in Oregon City, Oregon. 1 Portland Adventist Hospital v. Dept. of Rev., 8 OTR 381, 386-389 (1980). 2 Domogalla et al. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • BLADES, MARTIN v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC.

    2026 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 3, 2026

    The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board in Ledford v. Mid Georgia Courier, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In Thompson v. Comcast Corporation, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *13-21 (Jan. 30, 2018), the Appeals Board discussed circumstances where an employee may require an employer to pay for unauthorized treatment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Guye v. Deviprya, LLC

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 5, 2005

    Leggette v. McCotter, 265 N.C. 617 , 144 S.E.2d 849 (1965). The test for joint employment was established in Collins v. … The right of control over Kat's employees belonged to Kathryn Brown. Id. 5. The plaintiff has cited Henderson v. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc., 70 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-192, 80-193 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 1980

    It is well accepted that boards and agencies created by law can only exercise the powers granted by statute and cannot extend their power beyond that conferred upon them by law. Boydston v. … Adams v. Professional Practices Commission, Okla., 524 P.2d 932 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-010 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1980

    Article V, Section 62, Okl. Const. … Given the express authorization contained in Article V, Section 62 Okl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992

    SUMMEY V. TISDALE, 658 P.2D 464, 468 (OKLA.1982). SEE ALSO 19 O.S. 180 .65. … V. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 438 P.2D 484 (OKLA.1968). IN ADAIR COUNTY, THE COURT WAS ASKED TO RESOLVE A BUDGET DISPUTE BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-246 (1981) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 1981

    Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County v. Alexander, 171 Okl. 288 , 42 P.2d 884 (1935). … County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.