Case law

Dobbs, Janet v. Dale-Cole Transport, Inc.

2016 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2016

COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS TENNESSEE JANET DOBBS, ) Claimant, ) Docket No. 2015-08-0174 ) v. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review.

In Re Crahalla

747 A.2d 980 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2000

The Judicial Conduct Board (“Board”) is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution to file formal charges alleging ethical misconduct on the part of judges, justices, or justices of the peace and to present … Price v.

Opinion No. 92-558 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992

AND, AS DISCUSSED IN RELATION TO 162 AND 452, THE BOARD IS A "PRINCIPAL OFFICER" WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 O.S. 180 .65, SEE, ADAIR COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SUPRA. … IN STATE V.

Leigh v. the Winning Team

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 18, 1997

Frank Brown, an orthopaedic surgeon in Hendersonville. 18. Dr. Brown examined plaintiff on 26 January 1995. … Brown reviewed the DO scan. There was evidence of a possible disc herniation at L4-5. Dr. Brown excused plaintiff from work for thirty days.

Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School Dist.

141 Tex. 224 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 7, 1943

In State v. Chicago, R. I. & G. R. … McPhail v.

Whipple v. Sanford

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 30, 2007

Brown had contracted with Graf Auction Company to auction the equipment in the two North Carolina stores and Graf Auction Company informed Mr. Brown that Mr. … Lucas v. Stores , 289 N.C. 212 , 221 S.E.2d 257 (1976); Hart v. Motors , 244 N.C. 84 , 92 S.E.2d 673 (1956).

In re Bruno

69 A.3d 780 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013

The Board seeks this order under Article V, § 18(d)(2) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. … This type of order is authorized by Article V, § 18(b)(5) of the Constitution and is to be entered in cases where the Board has filed formal charges, and only after “a hearing or hearings.”

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm., 829 P.2d 964 , 969 (Okla. 1992). … See Associated Indus. of Oklahoma v.

ROMERO, MAURICIO v. JOACHIN MAGDIEL

2025 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 22, 2025

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To determine whether Mr. … Smiley v. Four Seasons Coach Leasing, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *10-11 (July 15, 2016). However, the Appeals Board emphasized the importance of the right to control the conduct of the work.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1975

In the case of Perma-Stone Oklahoma City Company v. … In the case of Realty Mortgage and Sales Company v.

Hewitt v. State

27 Misc. 2d 930 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 29, 1960

Brown to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 100± acres, deed recorded in Liber 1235 of Deeds at page 214 on September 2, 1956. … Y. 628 [1892]; Matter of Municipal Housing Auth. of City of Utica v. Rosenblum, 271 App. Div. 184 [1946]; Curley v. Jersey City, 83 N. J. L. 760 [1912]).

Sutton v. Weeks

5 Redf. 353 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1882

But while the amount of the penalty of the bond is large enough, the surety Brown, is insufficient. … When the bond was executed, Brown could and did justify in more than the amount of its penalty ; but he has since met with reverses, *357 and is nob now worth over §8,000, and that is not enough.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1997

Thomas v. Oklahoma Orthopedic and Arthritis Foundation, 903 P.2d 279 , 284 (Okla. 1995). ¶ 3 Subsections (A) and (B)(1) of 59 O.S. … Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Law Enforcement Commission, 764 P.2d 172 , 179 (Okla. 1988).

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1998

Poulous v. … Poulous v.

Shepherd, Stephen V. Haren Construction Co., Inc.

2016 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 19, 2016

See Long v. Mid-Tennessee Ford Truck Sales, 160 S.W.3d 504, 511 (Tenn. 2005); Vinson v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 655 s. W.2d 931, 932-33 (Tenn. 1987). … The Supreme Court held in Buchanan v. Mission Ins.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Jones

1 Mills Surr. 150 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1899

In Wilcox v. … Winnie v. Hills, 91 Hun, 89, 92 ; Van Slooten v. Wheeler, 140 N. Y. 624, 633 .

Opinion No. 79-183 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

Opinion No. 74-262 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

Burger v. Richards, Okl., 380 P.2d 687 ; Polk v. Oklahoma Alcohol Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 . … See Toole v. Michigan State Board of Dentistry, 11 N.W.2d 229 ; and Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . In the case of Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U.S. 425 , 71 L.Ed. 331 , 47 S.Ct. 122 , citing as authority Dent v.

Suraci v. Mucktar

187 Misc. 2d 848 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 23, 2000

A finding of noncompliance by the Loft Board is not “a prerequisite to a determination of noncompliance by a court.” (County Dollar Corp. v Douglas, 161 AD2d 370, 371 [1st Dept 1990].) … (See Dundee Equity Corp. v Johnston, 103 AD2d 692, 693 [1st Dept 1984]; Baxter v Captain Crow Mgt., 128 Misc 2d 254, 261, 263-264 [Sup Ct, NY County 1985].) II.