Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.98s

  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1988

    HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … SEE GOLDEN V. OKFUSKEE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, 723 P.2D 982, 983 (OKLA. 1986); AND BOARD OF REGENTS OF OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL COLLEGES V. UPDEQRAFF, 237 P.2D 131, 138 (OKLA. 1951).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1992

    UNITED STATES V. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY GENERATING CO., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.CT. 294 , 5 L.ED. 2D 268 (1961); YOUNGBLOOD V. CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3. PAYNE COUNTY, 230 P. 310 (OKLA. 1924).) … STATE V. SOWARDS, 82 P.2D 324 (OKLA.CR. 1938).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 2003

    Journal Publ'g Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okla.Ct.App. 1979). … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). Board approval of expenditures from the fund is necessarily implied from the power granted to the Board to carry out the provisions of the State Act.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

    Standard National Insurance Company v. State Board of Property and Casualty Rates, 520 P.2d 672 (Okla. 1974). … Oklahoma State AFL-CIO v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-183 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

    In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MARY ABRAYTIS v. PORTER COUNTY ASSESSOR

    Indiana Tax Court · Oct 3, 2023

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Stout, 996 N.E.2d 871, 873 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 1994

    The Board of Regents of Murray State College (the "Board") is created by statute at 70 O.S. 3407 .2. As a statutorily created board, it is subject to the supreme law-making power of the Legislature. Okla. Const. … Article V , Section 36 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1994

    Granting permission for municipal annexation of school property falls within the purview of the local boards' power to exercise sole control over the district property. ¶ 6 In fact, in James v. … Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain County, 811 P.2d 618 , 620 (Okla.App. 1991), citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-262 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

    Burger v. Richards, Okl., 380 P.2d 687 ; Polk v. Oklahoma Alcohol Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 . … See Toole v. Michigan State Board of Dentistry, 11 N.W.2d 229 ; and Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . In the case of Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U.S. 425 , 71 L.Ed. 331 , 47 S.Ct. 122 , citing as authority Dent v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Suraci v. Mucktar

    187 Misc. 2d 848 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 23, 2000

    A finding of noncompliance by the Loft Board is not “a prerequisite to a determination of noncompliance by a court.” (County Dollar Corp. v Douglas, 161 AD2d 370, 371 [1st Dept 1990].) … (See Dundee Equity Corp. v Johnston, 103 AD2d 692, 693 [1st Dept 1984]; Baxter v Captain Crow Mgt., 128 Misc 2d 254, 261, 263-264 [Sup Ct, NY County 1985].) II.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BDC/Bend SPE, LLC v. Deschutes County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jan 11, 2023

    See, e.g., Farmer’s Direct, Inc. v. … More recently, this court used a similar description in Huang v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Opinion No. 79-202 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 1979

    United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.Ct. 294 (1961), 5 L.Ed. 268 ; Youngblood v. Consolidated School District No. 3, Payne County, 104 Okl. 235 , 230 P. 910 (1924); Stigall v. … by a board member's employer where the board member has a direct or indirect interest in the contract.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weymouth Township v. Memorial Park Family Practice Center, Inc.

    7 N.J. Tax 589 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 19, 1985

    This burden never shifts and it remains upon the claimant both before the county board of taxation and in this court. Pingry Corp. v. … [Pingry Corp. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Interstate 78 Office Park, Ltd. v. Tewksbury Township

    11 N.J. Tax 172 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 26, 1990

    Properties v. Voorhees Tp., supra. Based on the foregoing the county board’s judgments denying farmland assessments for 1985 and 1986 are affirmed. … Compare Miele v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-136 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1972

    Taylor v. State, Okl. Cr., 377 P.2d 508 (1962). … See also Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 450 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1971); State v. Worten, 167 Okl. 187 , 29 P.2d 1 (1933);Stone v. Hodges, Okl., 435 P.2d 165 (1967); Shirnnel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wade, Courtney v. United Paecel Service, Inc.

    2024 TN WC 27 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 2, 2024

    Johnson v. Inspire Brands, Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 35, at *23 (Sept. 7, 2022). … This letter attempted to track the language in Vercek v. YRC, Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *4 (June 6, 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bakos v. Department of Local Government Finance

    848 N.E.2d 377 · Indiana Tax Court · May 25, 2006

    See Kemp v. Family and Soc. Servs., 693 N.E.2d 641, 644 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). … Licensing Bd. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Sposito

    30 N.Y.3d 1110 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Feb 8, 2018

    Defendant "bears the burden of establishing his claim that counsel's performance is constitutionally deficient" ( People v. Nicholson, 26 N.Y.3d 813 , 831, 28 N.Y.S.3d 663 , 48 N.E.3d 944 [2016] ; accord People v. … Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852 , 853-854, 410 N.Y.S.2d 287 , 382 N.E.2d 1149 [1978] ; accord People v. Campbell, 30 N.Y.3d 941 , 942-943, 67 N.Y.S.3d 125 , 89 N.E.3d 515 [2017] ).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2005

    Brotton Corp. v. Okla. … The adoption of this rule prevents the potential discriminatory application of the Board's discretion. See Hennessey v. Indep. Sch. Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1969

    In Pyeatte v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 102 F. Supp. 407 (W.D. … Hays v. State, Okl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.