Case law

Opinion No. 79-008 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2000

For example, in Stewart v. … Also see Rawls v.

Kleeburg, Monica v. Profit Line Services, Russell Floersheim/United Resource Group, Environmental Solutions Systems, Embassy Suites/Certistaff

2017 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2017

In considering the above factors, the Appeals Board held in Thompsen v. Concrete Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In deciding this issue, the Court notes the following discussion of the Appeals Board in Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell

9 Misc. 3d 644 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 15, 2005

Conclusion of Law The seminal case regarding the authority and autonomy of a cooperative’s board of directors to make decisions for the benefit of the cooperative is Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. … In its moving papers, the petitioner cites the case of 29-45 Tenants Corp. v Rowe (NYLJ, Jan. 8, 1992, at 23, col 4), which is analogous to the instant proceeding.

Opinion No. 76-334 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1976

Further, as to the definition of the term "executive session", Attorney General's Opinion 68-247 adopted the definition set forth in Blum v. Board of Zoning, 149 N.Y.S.2d 5 , and Thomas v. … Of course, at the close of the evidentiary hearing, a board may deliberate in closed session, in the same manner as a jury does in a court case, to arrive at its decision. See Stillwater Savings and Loan Association v.

Opinion No. 79-008 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by contract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 2006

Corp., 437 F.3d at 1367 ; CFSM Corp. v. Elbert McKee Co., 870 F. Supp. 819 , 833 (N.D. Ill. 1994). … See, e.g., Monroe v. Scofield, 135 F.2d 725 , 726 (10th Cir. 1943) ("A director is an officer of a corporation."); Cosgriff v.

People v. Sposito

30 N.Y.3d 1110 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Feb 8, 2018

Defendant "bears the burden of establishing his claim that counsel's performance is constitutionally deficient" ( People v. Nicholson, 26 N.Y.3d 813 , 831, 28 N.Y.S.3d 663 , 48 N.E.3d 944 [2016] ; accord People v. … Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852 , 853-854, 410 N.Y.S.2d 287 , 382 N.E.2d 1149 [1978] ; accord People v. Campbell, 30 N.Y.3d 941 , 942-943, 67 N.Y.S.3d 125 , 89 N.E.3d 515 [2017] ).

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001

Board of Regents v. … In the first such case, Board of Regents v.

In re the Accounting of National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.

28 Misc. 2d 113 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 1, 1960

(Matter of Brown, 201 Misc. 799 , 805 ; cf. Matter of Vanderbilt, 132 Misc. 150, 155 .) … Although the resolution of the board of directors does not characterize the distribution as a “ dividend ’ ’ but rather refers to it as a “ spin off ”, I do not think the resolution is controlling on this court.

Opinion No. 72-256 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972

In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … Therefore, under the standard of Guthrie Daily Leader v. Cameron, supra, a member of the Board of Public Accountancy is a public officer for the purposes of 51 O.S. 6 [ 51-6 ] (1971). In Gibson v.

Opinion No. 92-558 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992

AND, AS DISCUSSED IN RELATION TO 162 AND 452, THE BOARD IS A "PRINCIPAL OFFICER" WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 O.S. 180 .65, SEE, ADAIR COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SUPRA. … IN STATE V.

Williams, Stefanie v. Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc.

2021 TN WC 134 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 19, 2021

The Appeals Board recently held that a trial 2 court cannot award permanent partial disability benefits for the portion of a rating that is attributable to a non-work-related condition. Hart v. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

MANUS HENRY, CHRISTINA v. FITZGERALD COLLISION & REPAIR, LLC

2026 TN WC 78 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 4, 2026

In Edwards v. Peoplease, LLC, No. W2024-01034-SC-R3-WC, 2025 Tenn. LEXIS 514, at *26 (Tenn. Dec. 22, 2025), the Supreme Court analyzed the compensability of an aggravation of a preexisting condition. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Pinkham, Timothy W. v. Davis Enterprises of Tennessee, LLC

2026 TN WC 16 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 26, 2026

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015);. The threshold issue is whether Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1992

City of Tulsa v. … Pursuant to Board of Regents of the Univ. of Oklahoma v.

In Re Horgos

668 A.2d 306 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1995

The Board proposes far too broad an interpretation of Article V, section 17(b). This Court is bound by the strict language of the Constitution. … The Board is not without remedy in such situations. Art.

BDC/Bend SPE, LLC v. Deschutes County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jan 11, 2023

See, e.g., Farmer’s Direct, Inc. v. … More recently, this court used a similar description in Huang v.

Opinion No. 72-165 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 30, 1972

The Dahl case upheld an earlier decision, Wright v. … Such a case directly in point is Board of Education of County of Raleigh v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, 116 W. Va. 503 , 182 S.E. 87 (1935).

Clark County Assessor v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

Indiana Tax Court · Jun 5, 2024

v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 552 N.E.2d 850, 852 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1990). … Assessor v. Washington Square Mall, LLC, 46 N.E.3d 1, 11 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2015).