Case law

White, Shalanda v. Federal Express Corp.

2024 TN WC 53 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 24, 2024

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). She must show by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to the requested benefits. Willis v. … In Ernstes, the Appeals Board instructed that trial courts evaluating the issue of notice should consider the following: A.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 2002

Neer v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 982 P.2d 1071 , 1078 (Okla. 1999) (citation omitted). … Taylor v. Special Indem. Fund, 804 P.2d 431 , 432 (Okla. 1990) (citation omitted).

Lewis, Lea Ann v. Molly Maid, et al.

2016 TN WC App. 17 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 20, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Lea Ann Lewis ) Docket No. 2015-06-0456 ) v. … WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Lea Ann Lewis ) Docket No. 2015-06-0456 ) v.

Indianapolis Public Transportation Corp. v. Indiana Department of Local Government Finance

988 N.E.2d 1274 · Indiana Tax Court · May 3, 2013

Corp. v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 899 N.E.2d 762, 769 (Ind. … Assessor v. Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, LLC, 955 N.E.2d 876, 880 (Ind.

In re Ballentine

121 A.3d 611 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 2015

The Board has. established by clear and convincing evidence that Judge Bal-lentine’s conduct violated Article V, § 17(b) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 4. … Judge Ballentine is subject to discipline under Article V, Section 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. V.

Maples, Sallie A. v. Federal-Mogul Corporation

2016 TN WC App. 7 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 17, 2016

Whaley v. … Co. v. Transou, 614 S.W.2d 335, 337 (Tenn. 1981); Davis v. Travelers Ins. Co., 496 S.W.2d 458, 459 (Tenn. 1973); Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 350 S.W.2d 65, 70 (1961).

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 2003

Journal Publ'g Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okla.Ct.App. 1979). … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). Board approval of expenditures from the fund is necessarily implied from the power granted to the Board to carry out the provisions of the State Act.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

Standard National Insurance Company v. State Board of Property and Casualty Rates, 520 P.2d 672 (Okla. 1974). … Oklahoma State AFL-CIO v.

Opinion No. 71-199 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1971

With respect to the first question, we point out that the Board on Legislative Compensation has only such powers as are granted to it by the Oklahoma Constitution in Article V , Section 21 . … See State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 ; and Hines v. Winters, 320 P.2d 1114 . The Attorney General has also considered the relationship of the Board to the Legislature.

Opinion No. 79-183 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

MARY ABRAYTIS v. PORTER COUNTY ASSESSOR

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 3, 2023

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Stout, 996 N.E.2d 871, 873 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2013).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1994

Granting permission for municipal annexation of school property falls within the purview of the local boards' power to exercise sole control over the district property. ¶ 6 In fact, in James v. … Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain County, 811 P.2d 618 , 620 (Okla.App. 1991), citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

Opinion No. 74-262 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

Burger v. Richards, Okl., 380 P.2d 687 ; Polk v. Oklahoma Alcohol Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 . … See Toole v. Michigan State Board of Dentistry, 11 N.W.2d 229 ; and Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . In the case of Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U.S. 425 , 71 L.Ed. 331 , 47 S.Ct. 122 , citing as authority Dent v.

Suraci v. Mucktar

187 Misc. 2d 848 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 23, 2000

A finding of noncompliance by the Loft Board is not “a prerequisite to a determination of noncompliance by a court.” (County Dollar Corp. v Douglas, 161 AD2d 370, 371 [1st Dept 1990].) … (See Dundee Equity Corp. v Johnston, 103 AD2d 692, 693 [1st Dept 1984]; Baxter v Captain Crow Mgt., 128 Misc 2d 254, 261, 263-264 [Sup Ct, NY County 1985].) II.

BDC/Bend SPE, LLC v. Deschutes County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jan 11, 2023

See, e.g., Farmer’s Direct, Inc. v. … More recently, this court used a similar description in Huang v.

Downing v. Cycle Holdings, Inc.

2023 NCBC 10 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 1, 2023

Downing v. Cycle Holdings, Inc., 2023 NCBC 10. … Manti Holdings, LLC v. Authentix Acquisition Co., 261 A.3d 1199, 1217 (Del. Sep. 13, 2021); see also Schreiber v. Carney, 447 A.2d 17, 25 (Del. Ch.

Interstate 78 Office Park, Ltd. v. Tewksbury Township

11 N.J. Tax 172 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 26, 1990

Properties v. Voorhees Tp., supra. Based on the foregoing the county board’s judgments denying farmland assessments for 1985 and 1986 are affirmed. … Compare Miele v.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okla. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okla. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

Opinion No. 75-343 (1996) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976

In Oliver v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1961), the issue of legislative authority versus Board power was squarely met. … In Gambulos v.

Wade, Courtney v. United Paecel Service, Inc.

2024 TN WC 27 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 2, 2024

Johnson v. Inspire Brands, Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 35, at *23 (Sept. 7, 2022). … This letter attempted to track the language in Vercek v. YRC, Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *4 (June 6, 2017).