Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.80s

  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1996

    XIII , § 8 (emphasis added). ¶ 4 In Board of Regents University of Oklahoma v. … XIII-B , § 2 Under the principles announced in Board of Regents University of Oklahoma v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2009)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 2009

    Jackson v. Freeman , 905 P.2d 217 , 221 (Okla. 1995). … Kelly v. Okla. Pardon Parole Bd. , 637 P.2d 858 (Okla. Crim. App. 1981) (citing Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Neb. Penal Corr. Complex , 442 U.S. 1 , 7 (1979)); Shabazz v. Keating , 977 P.2d 1089 , 1093 (Okla. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Sposito

    30 N.Y.3d 1110 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Feb 8, 2018

    Defendant "bears the burden of establishing his claim that counsel's performance is constitutionally deficient" ( People v. Nicholson, 26 N.Y.3d 813 , 831, 28 N.Y.S.3d 663 , 48 N.E.3d 944 [2016] ; accord People v. … Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852 , 853-854, 410 N.Y.S.2d 287 , 382 N.E.2d 1149 [1978] ; accord People v. Campbell, 30 N.Y.3d 941 , 942-943, 67 N.Y.S.3d 125 , 89 N.E.3d 515 [2017] ).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

    Standard National Insurance Company v. State Board of Property and Casualty Rates, 520 P.2d 672 (Okla. 1974). … Oklahoma State AFL-CIO v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

    583 N.E.2d 214 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 6, 1991

    See Patsy v. Florida Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982); Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225, 242 , 92 S.Ct. 2151, 2162 , 32 L.Ed.2d 705 (1972); Monroe v. … Superior Court (1948), 32 Cal.2d 119, 122 , 194 P.2d 689, 692 ; see International Prisoners' Union v. Rizzo (E.D.Pa.1973), 356 F.Supp. 806, at 810 .) [Brown v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 92-558 (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992

    AND, AS DISCUSSED IN RELATION TO 162 AND 452, THE BOARD IS A "PRINCIPAL OFFICER" WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 O.S. 180 .65, SEE, ADAIR COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SUPRA. … IN STATE V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Muir Woods Section One Assn., Inc. v. Marion County Assessor

    Indiana Tax Court · Dec 22, 2023

    See also, e.g., Perry v. … Grp., LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1994

    Granting permission for municipal annexation of school property falls within the purview of the local boards' power to exercise sole control over the district property. ¶ 6 In fact, in James v. … Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain County, 811 P.2d 618 , 620 (Okla.App. 1991), citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979

    City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okla., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Buck v. State

    198 Misc. 575 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1950

    Y. 77, 82 ; Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. Y. 170, 173 .) “ The board of education is a governmental agency of the state. It is not a civil division of the state.” (Herman v. … (Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N. Y. 196, 201 , supra; matter in brackets and italics supplied.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1994

    The Oklahoma Supreme Court was persuaded by the decision in the Montana case of Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … The Baker court was also influenced by the Nebraska case of Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clower v. Fannin-Lamar-Delta Counties Levee Improvement Dist. No. 3

    39 S.W.2d 831 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 10, 1931

    Parker v. Ry. Co., 84 Tex. 333 , 19 S. W. 518 ; McIntire v. Lucker, 77 Tex. 259 , 13 S. W. 1027 ; Cummings v. Kendall County, 7 Tex. Civ. App. 101 , 26 S. W. 439 ; 1 Lewis, Eminent Domain (3d ! … In City of Dallas v. Saenger (Tex. Civ. App.) 255 S.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1990

    HOOVER V. BRACKEN ENERGIES. INC. V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, 723 F.2D 1488 (10TH CIR. 1983), CERT. DENIED, 105 S.CT. 93 ; CLINKENBEARD V. FRAZIER, 582 P.2D 413 (OKL. APP. 1978). … IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO USURP THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERPRETING ITS STATUTE, ESPECIALLY WHEN MATTERS ARE PENDING BEFORE THE BOARD.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Farmers' State Bank of Burkburnett v. Jameson

    11 S.W.2d 299 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 12, 1928

    v. … W. 254 ; Duncan v. Smith, 113 Tex. 555 , 260 S. W. 1027 ; Jones v. Wootton (Tex. Com. App.) 228 S. W. 142 ; Owens v. Cage, 101 Tex. 286 , 106 S. W. 880 ; Witt v. Kaufman, 25 Tex. Supp. 386 ; House v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Steak & Ale Restaurants of America v. Commonwealth

    70 Pa. D. & C.2d 582 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Sep 17, 1974

    in Commonwealth v. … But, even if appellant’s “cause of action” did not arise until after the appeal period for appeals from board orders had expired, it is clear that the previous ad *593 judication of the board in Commonwealth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1997

    Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 611 P.2d 628 , 632 (Okla. 1980). … Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, 612 P.2d 719 , 722 (Okla. 1980) (citing Rogers v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1991

    THE TERM "PUBLIC OFFICE" WAS FIRST DEFINED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V. … THIS WAS LATER FOLLOWED BY THE CASE OF OKLAHOMA CITY V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

    Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm., 829 P.2d 964 , 969 (Okla. 1992). … See Associated Indus. of Oklahoma v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001

    Board of Regents v. … In the first such case, Board of Regents v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1988

    HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY. 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666 (OKLA. 1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.