Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.92s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1992
SEE, E.G., FULLER V. ODOM, 741 P.2D 449 (OKLA.1987). THERE IS NO ROOM FOR CONSTRUCTION OR PROVISION FOR FURTHER INQUIRY WHEN THE LEGISLATURE PLAINLY EXPRESSES ITS INTENT. … SNEED V. SNEED, 585 P.2D 1363 (OKLA.1978). "STATUTES . . . MUST BE CONSTRUED AS A CONSISTENT WHOLE IN HARMONY WITH COMMON SENSE AND REASON(.)" COWART V. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORP., 665 P.2D 315, 317.
Cited 0 timesPublished90 Misc. 2d 977 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jul 12, 1977
She relies on the cases of People v Flores ( 90 Misc 2d 190 ), People v Miller ( 90 Misc 2d 399 ), and Dwyer v Guido ( 54 AD2d 956 ). … ), the Miller case (supra, opn by Judge Golden) and in People v Casella ( 90 Misc 2d 442 ).
Cited 11 timesPublished70 Misc. 2d 100 · New York Family Court · Mar 13, 1972
Geismar v. … Borella v. Borella, 21 A D 2d 871; Matter of Lang v. Lang, 9 A D 2d 401, supra; Brown v. Brown, 218 Ark. 624 ; Brashear v. Brashear, 71 Idaho 158 ; see, also, People ex rel. Moody v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBorough of Hamburg v. Trustees of the Presbytery
28 N.J. Tax 311 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 11, 2015
Plaintiff, the Borough of Hamburg (“the Borough”), appeals from the judgment of the Sussex County Board of Taxation (“the County Board”) granting property tax exemption to defendant, the Trustees of the Presbytery of Newton … Analysis The burden of persuading the Tax Court that a tax exemption is merited is on the claimant “even when the county board has granted exemption and the appeal is by the municipality.” Woods Court v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1978
V. McGinnis Theatres Pay T.V.I, Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc., 262 F. Supp. 607 , and Rogers v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 263 P.2d 409 . … See Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 167 P.2d 884 , and Lancaster v. State ex rel. Harrod, 426 P.2d 714 .
Cited 0 timesPublished668 A.2d 306 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1995
The Board proposes far too broad an interpretation of Article V, section 17(b). This Court is bound by the strict language of the Constitution. … The Board is not without remedy in such situations. Art.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1994
V. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, 742 P.2D 15 (OKLA.1987). … SEE: LETELLIER V. CLELAND AT 437 F.SUPP. 939.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. v. St. Joseph County Assessor
914 N.E.2d 13 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 30, 2009
In that opinion, the Court affirmed the Indiana Board of Tax Review's (Indiana Board) final determination that held that Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. … First, it argues that the Jamestown decision conflicts with the Court's decision in Oaken Bucket Partners, LLC v. Hamilton County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals, 909 N.E.2d 1129 (Ind. Tax Ct.2009). (Pet'r Pet.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 2007
In re Initiative Petition No. 281 v. Rogers , 434 P.2d 941 , 952 (Okla. 1967). … Bd. of Regents v. Baker , 638 P.2d 464 , 466 (Okla. 1981). "Limitations on legislative authority may be implied as well as expressed in the Constitution." Id.
Cited 0 timesPublished23rd & Flanders LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
17 Or. Tax 438 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 4, 2003
The board is authorized to hear such cases. … See Dept. of Rev. v. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 15 OTR 284, 287 (2001) (referring to ORS 305.288 as one of two rescuing statutes that may aid a taxpayer that misses the board process).
Cited 1 timesPublishedS. Envtl. Law Ctr. v. N.C. R.R. Co.
2020 NCBC 61 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 20, 2020
Law Ctr. v. N.C. R.R. Co., 2020 NCBC 61. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972
In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … Therefore, under the standard of Guthrie Daily Leader v. Cameron, supra, a member of the Board of Public Accountancy is a public officer for the purposes of 51 O.S. 6 [ 51-6 ] (1971). In Gibson v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2016 TN WC 97 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 2, 2016
) Judge Thomas Wyatt Employer, ) v. ) Sentry Ins. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWATSON, L’KESHIA v. ACCENTCARE, INC.
2026 TN WC 27 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 20, 2026
Barrett v. Lithko Cont., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 70, at *8-9 (Dec. 8, 2016). … Limberakis v. Pro-Tech Sec., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53, at *7 (Sept. 12, 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSeaboard Landing, LLC v. Borough of Penns Grove
28 N.J. Tax 607 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 3, 2015
Board of Educ. v. Neptune Twp. Educ. Ass’n, 144 N.J. 16, 25 , 675 A.2d 611 (1996)(quotations omitted). … The court also concluded that Seaboard's petitions of appeal should not have been dismissed by the county board for failure to pay taxes. See BDB Enterps. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979
City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okl., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1989
State v. Tapp, 380 P.2D 260, 265 (Okla. 1963). See also Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission, 216 P. 917 (Okla. 1923); Board of Education of City of Okmulgee v. … State Board of Education, 200 P.2d 394 (Okla. 1948); Curtis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdcock, Paul v. Robert L. Chaffin
2018 TN WC 132 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 29, 2018
See Dennis v. Polymer Components, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd., LEXIS 47, at *10 (Sept. 27, 20 16). … See, Duignan v. Stowers Machinery, Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 6, 2004
McClellan v. Health Maint. Org., 686 A.2d 801 , 805 (Pa. 1996); see also, Roberts v. Gen. Motors Corp., 643 A.2d 956 , 960 (N.H. 1994); Mahoney v. Baldwin, 543 N.E.2d 435 , 436 (Mass.App.Ct. 1989). … Licensure Supervision v. Bd. of Exam'rs in Optometry, No.
Cited 0 timesPublished113 Misc. 2d 847 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 23, 1982
The traveler has no choice other than to rely on such oral confirmations. v- The behavior of Pan American, however, as opposed to that of Eastern, must come under more intense scrutiny. … Corp. v United States, 499 F2d 1255.)
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna