Case law

Jones, Kenneth M. v. Valero Memphis Refinery

2024 TN WC 37 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2024

Jones’s claim to temporary disability benefits, the Appeals Board laid out the requirements for eligibility for these benefits in Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Seraph Garrison, LLC v. Garrison

2014 NCBC 28 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 26, 2014

Seraph Garrison, LLC v. Garrison, 2014 NCBC 28. … Johnson v. Owens, 263 N.C. 754, 757, 140 S.E.2d 311, 313 (1965).

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 11, 1993

Anderson v. … Burdick v. Takushi, 112 S.Ct. at 2063 , quoting from Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134 , 143 , 92 S.Ct. 849 , 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972). Also see Anderson v.

Guatemala, Concepion v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

2022 TN WC 11 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 8, 2022

Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53, at *8-9 (Sept. 14, 2018). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Plemmons Independent School Dist. v. Stinnett Independent School Dist.

59 S.W.2d 812 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 3, 1933

Crabb v. Celeste Independent School District, 105 Tex. 194, 197 , 146 S. W. 528 , 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 601, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 1146; Brennan et al. v. City of Weatherford, 53 Tex. 330 , 37 Am. Rep. 758 ; City of El Paso v. … W. 25 ; Kuhn v. City of Yoakum (Tex. Com. App.) 6 S.W.(2d) 91 .

Page v. Harnett County Public Utilities

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 20, 2006

Howard Brown with Brown Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Center. 15. Plaintiff presented to Dr. … Brown to discuss the MRI results. Dr. Brown told plaintiff that the treatment of the cervical spine took precedence, and that treatment of the shoulder should come later.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 2002

Neer v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 982 P.2d 1071 , 1078 (Okla. 1999) (citation omitted). … Taylor v. Special Indem. Fund, 804 P.2d 431 , 432 (Okla. 1990) (citation omitted).

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1979

See also Adams v. Professional Practices Commission, 524 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1974). … The legislature cannot delegate authority to an administrative board to amend or subvert a statute, Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.

Opinion No. 70-228 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1970

In the case of State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. Cr. 430 , 82 P.2d 324 , the court, in paragraphs two and three of its syllabus, held: "2. … To the same effect see Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 and Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co., 178 Okl. 212 , 62 P.2d 94 .

Wells County Assessor v. Alexin, LLC

46 N.E.3d 1289 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 31, 2015

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. … See City of Carmel v.

Ovidiu Ciceu v. Knox County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Apr 12, 2024

Pitman v. Pitman, 717 N.E.2d 627, 634 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (quoting Pittsburgh, C.,C. & St. L.R. Co. v. Muncie & P. Traction Co., 77 N.E. 941, 942 (Ind. 1906)). … The significant departure from standard procedural practice prevents Ciceu from satisfying his burden to show that the Indiana Board’s determination was erroneous. See, e.g., Snyder v.

Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. v. St. Joseph County Assessor

914 N.E.2d 13 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 30, 2009

In that opinion, the Court affirmed the Indiana Board of Tax Review's (Indiana Board) final determination that held that Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. … First, it argues that the Jamestown decision conflicts with the Court's decision in Oaken Bucket Partners, LLC v. Hamilton County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals, 909 N.E.2d 1129 (Ind. Tax Ct.2009). (Pet'r Pet.

Townsend, Timothy v. Universal Forest Products

2024 TN WC 5 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 7, 2024

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Sols., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). He must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

Interstate 78 Office Park, Ltd. v. Tewksbury Township

11 N.J. Tax 172 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 26, 1990

Properties v. Voorhees Tp., supra. Based on the foregoing the county board’s judgments denying farmland assessments for 1985 and 1986 are affirmed. … Compare Miele v.

Shelton, Bethany v/ Hobbs Enterprise, LLC

2020 TN WC 53 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 5, 2020

Shelton’s case, in Willis v. All Staff, 2017 Tenn. LEXIS 455, at *14 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1994

OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666, 668 (OKLA.1973). … SEE OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION V. FORTINBERRY CO., 207 P.2D 301 (OKLA. 1949). THIS DOES NOT MEAN, HOWEVER, THAT THE BOARD IS REQUIRED, BY STATUTE OR RULE, TO TAKE POSSESSION OF STUDENT RECORDS WHEN A SCHOOL CLOSES.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 2005

Smith v. … See also Carter Oil Co. v.

Marion County Assessor v. Square 74 Associates, LLC

Indiana Tax Court · Feb 14, 2024

See Allen v. Scherer, 452 N.E.2d 1031, 1034 (Ind. Ct. … See, e.g., CVS Corp. #6640-02 v. Madison Cnty.

Pitney v. Kelly

21 N.J. Misc. 405 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 8, 1943

See Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J. L. 126 (at p. 129); 18 Atl. Rep. (2d) 625; Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 5; 20 Atl. … See Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 5 (at p. 6); 20 Atl. Rep. (2d) 651; City Holding Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 168 (at p. 169); 21 Atl.

Sanders v. Sanders

178 Misc. 720 · New York Family Court · Jun 16, 1942

(Loomis v. Loomis, 288 N. … See Green v. Altenkirch, 176 App. Div. 320 , and the cases there cited. Cf. Maybee v. Avery, 18 Johns. 352 .) ” (Opinion of Loughran, J. in Loomis v. Loomis, supra, p. 226 .)