Case law

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1997

Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 611 P.2d 628 , 632 (Okla. 1980). … Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, 612 P.2d 719 , 722 (Okla. 1980) (citing Rogers v.

White, Shalanda v. Federal Express Corp.

2024 TN WC 53 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 24, 2024

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). She must show by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to the requested benefits. Willis v. … In Ernstes, the Appeals Board instructed that trial courts evaluating the issue of notice should consider the following: A.

Opinion No. 07-27 (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 2007

Cole v. Silverado Foods, Inc. , 78 P.3d 542 , 546 (Okla. 2003). … Porter v. Ferrell , 959 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1998).

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1990

Assoc. of Municipal Attorneys v. … Garton v. Hudson-Kimberly Pub.

Parker v. Bailey

15 S.W.2d 1033 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 10, 1929

The case of Whitaker v. Browning (Tex. Civ. App.) 155 S. W. 1197 , in which a writ of error was refused, appears to hold to the contrary, and is cited as the latest expression of the Supreme Court Upon the question. … It is unimportant, therefore, whether the Whitaker-Browning Case is to be distinguished from the Byrd Case.

CHARWOOD LLC v. Bartholomew County Assessor

906 N.E.2d 946 · Indiana Tax Court · May 14, 2009

Oil, Inc. v. Madison Twp. Assessor, 818 N.E.2d 1006 (Ind. Tax Ct.2004); Lindemann v. Wood, 799 N.E.2d 1230 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003); Wetzel Enter. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 694 N.E.2d 1259 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998); Kent Co. v. … The Petitioners also maintained that the only case supporting the PTABOA's interim reassessments, Lakeview Country Club, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 565 N.E.2d 392 (Ind.

Town of West Orange v. Estate of Goldman

2 N.J. Tax 582 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 25, 1981

The quality of that evidence falls far short of that required to overturn the presumption of correctness attending the county board judgment. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99 , 89 A.2d 385 (1952). … Schwartz v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Tax., 129 N.J.L. 129 , 28 A.2d 482 (Sup.Ct. 1942). Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the Essex County Board of Taxation.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2000

If the Board members are public officials, their salaries may not be increased during their terms of office. ¶ 8 The Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Oklahoma City v. Century Indem. … Summey v.

In re Ballentine

121 A.3d 611 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 2015

The Board has. established by clear and convincing evidence that Judge Bal-lentine’s conduct violated Article V, § 17(b) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 4. … Judge Ballentine is subject to discipline under Article V, Section 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. V.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 2005

Smith v. … See also Carter Oil Co. v.

Jones v. State

33 Misc. 2d 959 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1962

(Embler v. Town of Wallkill, 132 N. Y. 222 ; Julian v. State of New York, 187 Misc. 146 ; Messinger v. State of New York, 183 Misc. 811 ; Brown v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 307 ; Tagg v. City of Lockport, 228 App. … Y. 582 ; McGarey v. City of New York, 89 App. Div. 500 .) This applies whether the trunks of the trees are inside or outside of the highway bounds. (Messinger v. State of New York, supra; Brown v.

Nestor v. Britt

16 Misc. 3d 368 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 23, 2007

. 12, 2006, Jackman-Brown, J., Index No. 100842/05.) … (See Nestor v Britt, Hous Part, Civ Ct, NY County, Jan. 12, 2006, JackmanBrown, J., Index No. 100842/05.) Judge Jackman-Brown found the 30-day predicate notice improper and that petitioners served respondent improperly.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 2002

Neer v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 982 P.2d 1071 , 1078 (Okla. 1999) (citation omitted). … Taylor v. Special Indem. Fund, 804 P.2d 431 , 432 (Okla. 1990) (citation omitted).

In re Application for the Probate of the Will of Backus

1 Mills Surr. 313 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1899

See Burnham v. Comfort, 108 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Dowd, 58 How. Pr. 109 ; Brown v. Brown, 16 Barb. 569 ; McNaughton v. McNaughton, 34 N. Y. 203 ; Adams v. Winne, 7 Paige, 100 -101; Vandemark v. Vandemark, 26 Barb. 418 .

Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. v. St. Joseph County Assessor

914 N.E.2d 13 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 30, 2009

In that opinion, the Court affirmed the Indiana Board of Tax Review's (Indiana Board) final determination that held that Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. … First, it argues that the Jamestown decision conflicts with the Court's decision in Oaken Bucket Partners, LLC v. Hamilton County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals, 909 N.E.2d 1129 (Ind. Tax Ct.2009). (Pet'r Pet.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf

9 Mills Surr. 464 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1912

Drake v. Drake, 134 N. Y. 220 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 id. 244 ; United States Trust Co. v. Tobias, 21 Abb. N. C. 392 . Renotice decree for settlement.

Rooks, Sabrina v. Amazon.com

2025 TN WC 45 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 17, 2025

The Appeals Board has not offered recent guidance on the definition of “unreasonable” in this context. McCool v. Prof. Care Servs., LLC, 2025 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *5 (July 10, 2025). … In Thompson v.

Jones, Kenneth M. v. Valero Memphis Refinery

2024 TN WC 37 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2024

Jones’s claim to temporary disability benefits, the Appeals Board laid out the requirements for eligibility for these benefits in Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Interstate 78 Office Park, Ltd. v. Tewksbury Township

11 N.J. Tax 172 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 26, 1990

Properties v. Voorhees Tp., supra. Based on the foregoing the county board’s judgments denying farmland assessments for 1985 and 1986 are affirmed. … Compare Miele v.

In Re Nakoski Ex Rel. Magisterial District 06-3-01

742 A.2d 260 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2001

The cases cited by the Board are: Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988); Matter of Cunningham, 517 Pa. 417 , 538 A.2d 473 (1988); Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v. … In Commonwealth v.