Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1971
With respect to the first question, we point out that the Board on Legislative Compensation has only such powers as are granted to it by the Oklahoma Constitution in Article V , Section 21 . … See State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 ; and Hines v. Winters, 320 P.2d 1114 . The Attorney General has also considered the relationship of the Board to the Legislature.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHudson, Dylan K. v. Coca Cola North American
2026 TN WC 72 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2026
Hudson, Docket No. 2025-10-5104 Employee, v. … Edwards v. Peoplease, LLC, No. W2024-01034-SC-R3-WC, 2025 Tenn. LEXIS 514, at *19-20 (Tenn. Dec. 22, 2025). Here, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYoung, James v. COBBLESTONE INDUS., INC.
2024 TN WC 71 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 30, 2024
Thompson v. Comcast Corporation, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd., LEXIS 1, at *29 (Jan. 30, 2018). … Despite this language, the Appeals Board affirmed the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees in Thompson. Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHolt, Jeremy v. PROFESSIONAL TOUCH CLEANING OF THE TRI-CITIES
2024 TN WC 76 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 30, 2024
See Dorsey v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnderson., Myron v. 84 Lumber Company
2024 TN WC App. 47 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 9, 2024
the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or complex.” … Semich v. AT&T Services, Inc., No. 2021-06-0997, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *7-8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. June 8, 2023) (quoting Johnson v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., 146 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished140 Misc. 357 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 8, 1931
(Fralick v. Lyford, 107 App. Div. 543, 547 ; White v. Howard, 46 N. Y. 144, 160 ; Ely v. Megie, 219 id. 112.) … Its board of directors since that time to the year 1921 was known as the Board of Missions. For the past ten years these directors have been known as the National Council.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1994
V. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, 742 P.2D 15 (OKLA.1987). … SEE: LETELLIER V. CLELAND AT 437 F.SUPP. 939.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976
In Oliver v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1961), the issue of legislative authority versus Board power was squarely met. … In Gambulos v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWellington Belleville, L.L.C. v. Belleville Township
20 N.J. Tax 331 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 10, 2002
Corp. v. City of East Orange, 19 N.J.Tax 469 (Tax 2001), the Essex County Board of Taxation dismissed the plaintiffs appeal for failure to pay taxes. Plaintiff then filed a complaint in the Tax Court. … Jefferson-Halsey Roads Assocs., L.P. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedAkls Realty Associates, Inc. v. Township of Burlington
10 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 3, 1988
Compare Passaic v. … Lee Boro. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn Re Daghir, 1 Jd 95 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 4-10-1995)
657 A.2d 1032 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1995
The Board cannot prove that Robert V. Howard received any such favorable treatment from the Respondent. (Stip.Fact No. 16.) 16. … Additionally, § 18 also subjects judicial officers to disciplinary sanctions if the Board establishes that a judge violated a *1036 provision of § 17 of Article V of the Constitution. This Court hereby concludes: 1.
Cited 7 timesPublishedChevrolet of Columbus, Inc v. Bartholomew County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Mar 19, 2024
Chevrolet then appealed the Indiana Board’s decision to this Court, which reversed and remanded the case back to the Indiana Board. Chevrolet of Columbus, Inc. v. Bartholomew Cnty. Assessor, 187 N.E.3d 349, 354 (Ind. … Assessor v. Kooshtard Prop. I, LLC, 38 N.E.3d 754, 758 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Or. Tax 221 · Oregon Tax Court · Nov 7, 1979
See Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308, 314 , 365 P2d 89, 92 (1961); Rogue River Pack. v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 293 (1976).) … State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 538-539 , 368 P2d 323, 325 (1962); Girt et al v. Tri-Met et al, 4 OTR 92, 95 (1970).
Cited 7 timesPublished82 Misc. 2d 447 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 27, 1975
Using Crisona as its authority, the Court of Appeals extended the doctrine to members of the Board of Higher Education in Lombardo v Stoke ( 18 NY2d 394 ). … No. 1 of Huntington, 45 Misc 2d 916 ) and to members of a board of education (Smith v Helbraun, 21 AD2d 830 , supra).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBentley v. Mgm Transport Company
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 9, 1997
Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , ___ N.C. App. ___, 477 S.E.2d 197 , 202 (1996); Franklin v. Broyhill Furniture Industries , 123 N.C. App. 200 , 205 , 472 S.E.2d 382 , 386 (1996). 2. … Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 477 S.E.2d 197 , 202 (1996). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979
City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okl., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarr, Devin v. AUTO ART OF NASHVILLE
2024 TN WC 49 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 12, 2024
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE DEVIN BARR, ) Docket No. 2020-06-1153 Employee, ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRAY, KELLY v. LEWIS BROS. BAKERY, INC. OF TN
2026 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 27, 2026
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO KELLY RAY Docket No. 2025-50-4092 Employee, State File No. 61607-2024 v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished2025 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 15, 2025
See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … See Long v. Hamilton-Ryker, No. 2015-07-0023, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 23, at *15 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewton Town v. Newton Medical Building
13 N.J. Tax 462 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 10, 1993
Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418, 431 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985), contending that F.M.C. Stores Co. modified both Matawan Boro. v. … See Gabrellian & Jessourian v. Oakland, 11 N.J.Tax 310, 317-19 (Tax 1990) and Abe Schrader Corp. v. Secaucus, 8 N.J.Tax 390 (Tax 1986).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna