Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Opinion No. 71-199 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1971

    With respect to the first question, we point out that the Board on Legislative Compensation has only such powers as are granted to it by the Oklahoma Constitution in Article V , Section 21 . … See State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 ; and Hines v. Winters, 320 P.2d 1114 . The Attorney General has also considered the relationship of the Board to the Legislature.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hudson, Dylan K. v. Coca Cola North American

    2026 TN WC 72 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2026

    Hudson, Docket No. 2025-10-5104 Employee, v. … Edwards v. Peoplease, LLC, No. W2024-01034-SC-R3-WC, 2025 Tenn. LEXIS 514, at *19-20 (Tenn. Dec. 22, 2025). Here, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Young, James v. COBBLESTONE INDUS., INC.

    2024 TN WC 71 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 30, 2024

    Thompson v. Comcast Corporation, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd., LEXIS 1, at *29 (Jan. 30, 2018). … Despite this language, the Appeals Board affirmed the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees in Thompson. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holt, Jeremy v. PROFESSIONAL TOUCH CLEANING OF THE TRI-CITIES

    2024 TN WC 76 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 30, 2024

    See Dorsey v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson., Myron v. 84 Lumber Company

    2024 TN WC App. 47 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 9, 2024

    the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or complex.” … Semich v. AT&T Services, Inc., No. 2021-06-0997, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *7-8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. June 8, 2023) (quoting Johnson v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., 146 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Dering

    140 Misc. 357 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 8, 1931

    (Fralick v. Lyford, 107 App. Div. 543, 547 ; White v. Howard, 46 N. Y. 144, 160 ; Ely v. Megie, 219 id. 112.) … Its board of directors since that time to the year 1921 was known as the Board of Missions. For the past ten years these directors have been known as the National Council.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1994

    V. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, 742 P.2D 15 (OKLA.1987). … SEE: LETELLIER V. CLELAND AT 437 F.SUPP. 939.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-343 (1996) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976

    In Oliver v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1961), the issue of legislative authority versus Board power was squarely met. … In Gambulos v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wellington Belleville, L.L.C. v. Belleville Township

    20 N.J. Tax 331 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 10, 2002

    Corp. v. City of East Orange, 19 N.J.Tax 469 (Tax 2001), the Essex County Board of Taxation dismissed the plaintiffs appeal for failure to pay taxes. Plaintiff then filed a complaint in the Tax Court. … Jefferson-Halsey Roads Assocs., L.P. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Akls Realty Associates, Inc. v. Township of Burlington

    10 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 3, 1988

    Compare Passaic v. … Lee Boro. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Daghir, 1 Jd 95 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 4-10-1995)

    657 A.2d 1032 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1995

    The Board cannot prove that Robert V. Howard received any such favorable treatment from the Respondent. (Stip.Fact No. 16.) 16. … Additionally, § 18 also subjects judicial officers to disciplinary sanctions if the Board establishes that a judge violated a *1036 provision of § 17 of Article V of the Constitution. This Court hereby concludes: 1.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Chevrolet of Columbus, Inc v. Bartholomew County Assessor

    Indiana Tax Court · Mar 19, 2024

    Chevrolet then appealed the Indiana Board’s decision to this Court, which reversed and remanded the case back to the Indiana Board. Chevrolet of Columbus, Inc. v. Bartholomew Cnty. Assessor, 187 N.E.3d 349, 354 (Ind. … Assessor v. Kooshtard Prop. I, LLC, 38 N.E.3d 754, 758 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Heine

    8 Or. Tax 221 · Oregon Tax Court · Nov 7, 1979

    See Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308, 314 , 365 P2d 89, 92 (1961); Rogue River Pack. v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 293 (1976).) … State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 538-539 , 368 P2d 323, 325 (1962); Girt et al v. Tri-Met et al, 4 OTR 92, 95 (1970).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McAulay v. Maloff

    82 Misc. 2d 447 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 27, 1975

    Using Crisona as its authority, the Court of Appeals extended the doctrine to members of the Board of Higher Education in Lombardo v Stoke ( 18 NY2d 394 ). … No. 1 of Huntington, 45 Misc 2d 916 ) and to members of a board of education (Smith v Helbraun, 21 AD2d 830 , supra).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bentley v. Mgm Transport Company

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 9, 1997

    Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , ___ N.C. App. ___, 477 S.E.2d 197 , 202 (1996); Franklin v. Broyhill Furniture Industries , 123 N.C. App. 200 , 205 , 472 S.E.2d 382 , 386 (1996). 2. … Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 477 S.E.2d 197 , 202 (1996). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979

    City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okl., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barr, Devin v. AUTO ART OF NASHVILLE

    2024 TN WC 49 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 12, 2024

    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE DEVIN BARR, ) Docket No. 2020-06-1153 Employee, ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • RAY, KELLY v. LEWIS BROS. BAKERY, INC. OF TN

    2026 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 27, 2026

    WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO KELLY RAY Docket No. 2025-50-4092 Employee, State File No. 61607-2024 v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mueller, Linda v. CSL Plasma

    2025 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 15, 2025

    See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … See Long v. Hamilton-Ryker, No. 2015-07-0023, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 23, at *15 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newton Town v. Newton Medical Building

    13 N.J. Tax 462 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 10, 1993

    Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418, 431 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985), contending that F.M.C. Stores Co. modified both Matawan Boro. v. … See Gabrellian & Jessourian v. Oakland, 11 N.J.Tax 310, 317-19 (Tax 1990) and Abe Schrader Corp. v. Secaucus, 8 N.J.Tax 390 (Tax 1986).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.