Case law

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2010

Edmondson v. … In all these situations, the salaries of county officials are set by the board of county commissioners, subject to the approval of the county excise board. State ex rel. Macy v.

Gutierrez v. Premium Standard Farms, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 12, 2008

He stated that if the blood was pinkish, as opposed to dark brown or black in color, it would have been fresher. … See Hand v. Fieldcrest Mills , Inc ., 85 N.C.

Harrison v. Orr

10 S.W.2d 381 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 14, 1928

Stevenson v. Barrow (Tex. Com. App.) 291 S. W. 1101 ; Weir v. McGee, 25 Tex. Supp. 21 , 33 ; Threadgill v. Shaw (Tex. Civ. App.) 148 S. W. 825 . … Clements, 13 Tex. 592 ; Smith v. Fly, 24 Tex. 345 , 76 Am. Dec. 109 ; Kuhlman v. Baker, 50 Tex. 630 ; Alston v. Richardson, 51 Tex. 1 ; Brown v. Brown, 61 Tex. 45 ; Ney v. Rothe, 61 Tex. 374 ; Bass v.

Dunckley v. State

136 Misc. 2d 767 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 21, 1987

(Santangelo v State of New York, supra, at 27.) In the case before the court, the only regulation that was in effect required the use of helmets "satisfactory” to the Board. … (Cf., Discenza v New York Racing Assn., 134 Misc 2d 3 .) Claimant has offered no evidence to establish that the Board’s decision to defer the requiring of Snell helmets lacked a rational basis.

Marion County Assessor v. Square 74 Associates, LLC

Indiana Tax Court · Feb 14, 2024

See Allen v. Scherer, 452 N.E.2d 1031, 1034 (Ind. Ct. … See, e.g., CVS Corp. #6640-02 v. Madison Cnty.

Questions Submitted by Kyle Counts, Executive Director, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board

2025 OK AG 21 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2025

Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing Home , 2005 OK 27 130 P.3d 213 Brisco v. State ex rel. Bd. of Regents of Agric. & Mech. Colls. , 2017 OK 35 394 P.3d 1251 Roach v. Atlas Life Ins. … Spearman v.

Clark County Assessor v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

Indiana Tax Court · Jun 5, 2024

Moriarity v. Indiana Dep’t Nat. Res., 113 N.E.3d 614, 622 (Ind. 2019). … Assessor v. Washington Square Mall, LLC, 46 N.E.3d 1, 11 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2015).

In re Jaffe

839 A.2d 487 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2003

The Board is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging misconduct on the part of justices, judges, or justices of the peace, and to present the case … The Board has, however, not charged this Respondent with a violation of Article V, § 18(d)(1) for conviction of a felony; but, rather, has charged that Respondent’s conduct, which happened to result in conviction of a felony

Taft Church of Evangelical Church of North America v. Department of Revenue

14 Or. Tax 119 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 28, 1997

See Freightliner Corp. v. Dept. of Rev., 5 OTR 270 (1973). Here, the assessor added the property to the tax roll prospectively. … Taxpayer cites Skyline Assembly of God v. Dept. of Rev., 274 Or 259 , 545 P2d 879 (1976) and Worrell v. Dept. of Rev., 282 Or 531 , 579 P2d 858 (1978).

Jones v. State

33 Misc. 2d 959 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1962

(Embler v. Town of Wallkill, 132 N. Y. 222 ; Julian v. State of New York, 187 Misc. 146 ; Messinger v. State of New York, 183 Misc. 811 ; Brown v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 307 ; Tagg v. City of Lockport, 228 App. … Y. 582 ; McGarey v. City of New York, 89 App. Div. 500 .) This applies whether the trunks of the trees are inside or outside of the highway bounds. (Messinger v. State of New York, supra; Brown v.

People v. NYRA & Barterama, Inc.

126 Misc. 2d 783 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 31, 1984

Mindful of the Court of Appeals decision in Namro I, I adopt the procedure announced in People v Brown, ( 40 NY2d 381 [1976]), and subsequently codified in CPL 290.10 (1) (b). 4 This *794 mechanism will insure appellate review … (United States v Scott, 437 US 82 [1978]; People v Brown, 40 NY2d 381 ; People v Marin, 102 AD2d 14 [2d Dept 1984].)

Parker v. Bailey

15 S.W.2d 1033 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 10, 1929

The case of Whitaker v. Browning (Tex. Civ. App.) 155 S. W. 1197 , in which a writ of error was refused, appears to hold to the contrary, and is cited as the latest expression of the Supreme Court Upon the question. … It is unimportant, therefore, whether the Whitaker-Browning Case is to be distinguished from the Byrd Case.

Washington Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Marion County Assessor

9 N.E.3d 271 · Indiana Tax Court · May 9, 2014

the Marion County Property Tax Board of Appeals (PTA-BOA). … State v.

H & H Chiropractic Services, P.C. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

47 Misc. 3d 1075 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 24, 2015

Mallela and its progeny (Metroscan Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 13 Misc 3d 35 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2006]; Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v Progressive Ins. … in Education Law § 6509-a [and] the rules for professional conduct established by the Board of Regents (8 NYCRR 29.1 [b] [4]).”

Millburn Township v. Short Hills Associates

23 N.J. Tax 311 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 6, 2007

See State by Comm’r of Transp. v. … Ass’n v. Cresskill Borough, 15 N.J.Tax 629 (Tax 1996); Mori v.

In re Application for the Probate of the Will of Backus

1 Mills Surr. 313 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1899

See Burnham v. Comfort, 108 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Dowd, 58 How. Pr. 109 ; Brown v. Brown, 16 Barb. 569 ; McNaughton v. McNaughton, 34 N. Y. 203 ; Adams v. Winne, 7 Paige, 100 -101; Vandemark v. Vandemark, 26 Barb. 418 .

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 8, 2003

White v. Wint, 638 P.2d 1109 , 1112-13 (Okla. 1981); Byars v. State, 102 P. 804 , (syllabus ¶ 1) (Okla.Crim. 1909). … Cartwright v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 2003

Riley v. … ROGERS Assistant Attorney General 1 See Morris v. City of Oklahoma City, 299 P.2d 131 , 137-38 (Okla. 1956); Bd. of County Comm'rs v.

Hudson, Dylan K. v. Coca Cola North American

2026 TN WC 72 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2026

Hudson, Docket No. 2025-10-5104 Employee, v. … Edwards v. Peoplease, LLC, No. W2024-01034-SC-R3-WC, 2025 Tenn. LEXIS 514, at *19-20 (Tenn. Dec. 22, 2025). Here, Dr.

Gillett v. Campbell

1 Denio 520 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 15, 1845

(Runyan v. Mersereau, 11 John. R. 534.) Corporations,- like individuals, may appoint agents, and make most of the contracts which fall within the scope of their general powers, without the use of a seal. … Now although this association may have voluntarily committed the management of its affairs to a board of directors, I am of opinion that the statute in question does not apply.