Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.30s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1972
Potter v. LaMunyon, 389 F.2d 874 (10th Cir. 1968); Mills v. Smith, Okl., 355 P.2d 1064 , 82 A.L.R.2d 1144 (1960). … Article V, Section 11, Article V, Section 15, Article V, Section 19, Okl. Const.
Cited 0 timesPublishedABC Inc. and Combined Affiliates v. Dept. of Rev.
Oregon Tax Court · Sep 8, 2025
See Lommasson v. School Dist. … See Con-Way, Inc. & Affiliates v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1998
McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297,302 (Okla. 1968) (citation omitted). … Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision v. Migliaccio, 917 P.2d 483 , 486 (Okla.Ct.App. 1996), citing Marley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 2005
Spearman v. Williams, 415 P.2d 597 , 600 (Okla. 1966) (citations omitted). In Jackson v. … Trapp v. Cook Constr. Co., 105 P. 667 , 669 (Okla. 1909) (emphasis added); see also Oliver v. Okla.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 8, 2003
White v. Wint, 638 P.2d 1109 , 1112-13 (Okla. 1981); Byars v. State, 102 P. 804 , (syllabus ¶ 1) (Okla.Crim. 1909). … Cartwright v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHeadley, Harry v. Roadstar, LLC
2024 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 22, 2024
However, in Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *16 (May 18, 2017), the Appeals Board reversed the trial court’s order to authorize a panel. … LEXIS 53, at *10 (Sept. 12, 2017), the Board held the employer must submit a new panel if the original authorized doctor refused to treat the employee. In Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublished525 Realty Holding Co. v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights
3 N.J. Tax 206 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 21, 1981
The assessments and county board judgment reflect the following: Block 153, Lot 1 Block 133, Lot 11-20 Assessment County Board Assessment County Board Land $ 47,500 $ 47,500 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Improvements 253,200 137,500 … New Brunswick v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedEastgate Partnership v. Department of Local Government Finance
780 N.E.2d 435 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 17, 2002
ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to the final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Walker Mfg. Co. v. … "Once the taxpayer carries the burden of establishing a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the State Board to rebut the taxpayer's evi-denee and justify its decision with substantial evidence." Clark v.
Cited 1 timesPublished166 Misc. 2d 333 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 11, 1995
He was released on $200 bail and, together with his wife, boarded a bus for Albany. … The rationale of the negligent misrepresentation aspect of the Williams holding was reaffirmed by the Third Department in Collins v Brown ( 129 AD2d 902, 904 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished967 A.2d 1094 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2009
INTRODUCTION The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint with this Court on April 22, 2008 against Judge Willie F. … Pursuant to Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Board is granted authority to determine whether there is probable cause to file formal charges, and when it concludes that probable
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn re the Estate of Westinghouse
156 Misc. 320 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 26, 1935
A case directly in point is Eagan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue *322 (43 F. [2d] 881). … (Eagan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra; Gimbel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 54 F. [2d] 780.) The appeal is sustained.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAm. Transp. Grp. Ins. Risk Retention Grp. v. Mvt Ins. Servs., Inc.
2021 NCBC 26 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 19, 2021
Risk Retention Grp. v. MVT Ins. Servs., Inc., 2021 NCBC 26. … As part of ATGI’s compliance efforts, on March 13, 2020 and April 3, 2020, ATGI’s Board adopted resolutions which increased the number of board members from three to five; appointed three new independent board members—Ron
Cited 0 timesPublishedBlack, James v. Prestige Group, LLC
2016 TN WC 161 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 15, 2016
.: 2015-06-0423 Employee, ) v. ) State File Number: 75113-2014 Prestige Group, LLC ) Employer. … After the workers' compensation judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board judge for review
Cited 0 timesPublished329 Pa. 197 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1937
Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 , 22 Pac. 1042 ; Lotts v. Board of Park Commissioners of Los Angeles, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 625, 57 Pac. (2d) 215 ; Michaelis v. Board of Fire Commissioners of Jersey City, 49 N. J. … L. 154, 6 Atl. 881 ; State v. Mayor of Jersey City, 53 N. J. L. 118, 20 Atl. 831 ; People v. Board of Education of New York, 79 N. Y. Supp. 624 , affirmed 174 N. Y. 169 , 66 N. E. 674 ; McCarthy v.
Cited 23 timesPublished10 N.J. Tax 537 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 30, 1989
Salem v. Salem Cty. … Bass River Tp. v. Driscoll, 3 N.J. Tax 177 (Tax Ct.1981). Here, however, the board did not issue any revised judgment. Instead, it advised Alpine that the original judgment would not be revised.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLanier v. N.C. Department of Transportation
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublished2016 TN WC App. 54 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 14, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD David Raine ) Docket No. 2015-06-0986 ) v. … Mosby v. McDowell Ctr. for Children, No.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005
See Woodward v. … See Richey Manor, Inc. v. Schweiker, 684 F.2d 130 , 135 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSweeney v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090313c (or.tax 6-30-2009)
Oregon Tax Court · Jun 30, 2009
Plaintiff did not appeal to the county board of property tax appeals (board) in 2006 because she was unaware of the appeal process until after the December 31, 2006, board petition deadline. … See Lee's v. Dept. of Rev. , TC 4830, WL 924976 *1 (Apr 6, 2009) (ruling that statutes do not permit taxpayers to appeal "their own actions in agreeing to values."). B.
Cited 0 timesPublished1998 NCBC 4 · North Carolina Business Court · Oct 24, 1998
GREENE v. … ) BANCSHARES, INC. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna