Case law

In re the Estate of O'Hanlon

147 Misc. 546 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 25, 1933

(Ely v. Megie, 219 N. Y. 112, at p. 143 ; Mount v. Tuttle, 183 id. 358; Hughes v. Stoutenburgh, 168 App. Div. 512 , and cases cited.) … A late case in point is Saltsman v. Greene ( 256 N.

Exxon Corp. v. East Brunswick Tp.

5 N.J. Tax 216 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 16, 1982

Co. of N.J. v. … In East Orange v.

Holmes v. Ellis Watkins d/b/a Watkins Lawn Care

2018 TN WC App. 7 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 13, 2018

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Daryl Holmes ) Docket No. 2017-08-0504 ) v. … Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined.

Parole Violators

83 Pa. D. & C. 32 · Pennsylvania Board of Parole · Aug 27, 1952

Tate v. Burke, 364 Pa. 179 (1950), this practice was held to be improper because section 14 of the Act of June 19, 1911, P. … Tate v. Burke, supra; Commonwealth ex rel. Carmelo v. Smith, 347 Pa. 495 (1943).

Opinion No. 74-221 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1975

Walsh, 61 P.2d 1109 (1936); State Highway Commission v. Adams, 62 P.2d 1013 (1937); Donaldson v. Board of Regents of University Preparatory School and Junior College of Tonkawa, 122 P.2d 139 (1942); Henry v. … Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, 478 P.2d 898 (1970); and State ex rel State Board of Public Affairs v. Principal Fund Corp., 519 P.2d 503 (1974).

HEADLEY, HARRY V. ROADSTAR, LLC

2025 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 24, 2025

.: 2023-07-7479 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 68020-2023 ROADSTAR, LLC, ) Employer, … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

George A. Fuller Co. v. Jersey City

21 N.J. Misc. 38 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 19, 1943

In the case of Montclair v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 382; 22 Atl. Rep. (2d) 525; affirmed, 128 N. J. … The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Crawford v. Roloson, 149 N. E. Rep. 707, construed the words “as soon as may be” to be the equivalent of “as soon as was reasonably possible.”

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2003

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Legislative intent is ascertained from reading the whole Act, "in the light of the general purpose and object." City of Midwest City v. … AMF Tubescope Co. v.

In Re Murphy

10 A.3d 932 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2010

This action is taken pursuant to the authority of the Board under Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which grants the Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause … Const., Article V, § 18(d)(1).

In re the Estate of Donchian

120 Misc. 535 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1923

Y. 396, 404 ; Brinkerhoff v. Seabury, 137 App. Div. 916 ; Kalish v. Kalish, 166 N. Y. 368, 375 ; Matter of Kohler, 231 id. 353, 376. Third. … Sherman v. Richmond Hose Co., 230 N. Y. 462, 467 ; Matter of Griffin, 167 id. 71, 84, majority opinion of the court by Cullen, J.

BP Products North America Inc. v. Matonovich

842 N.E.2d 901 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 21, 2006

OPINION AND ANALYSIS Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Miller Vill. Prop. Co. v. … The burden of demonstrating the invalidity of an Indiana Board final determination rests with the challenging party. See Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs. L.P., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003).

H & H Chiropractic Services, P.C. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

47 Misc. 3d 1075 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 24, 2015

Mallela and its progeny (Metroscan Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 13 Misc 3d 35 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2006]; Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v Progressive Ins. … in Education Law § 6509-a [and] the rules for professional conduct established by the Board of Regents (8 NYCRR 29.1 [b] [4]).”

In Re Pazuhanich

858 A.2d 231 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2004

The Board now charges that that conduct subjects Respondent to discipline under Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution because that conduct constitutes a violation of Article V, § 17(b) of the Pennsylvania … See, also, Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988); Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v.

Wilk Enterprises Inc. v. J. I. B. Realty Corp.

72 Misc. 2d 507 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 15, 1972

(Congregation Anshe Sefard v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 291 N. Y. 35 ; Kobouroff v. Blake, 16 Misc 2d 202 , supra; Scott v. Browning Business Serv., 175 Misc. 630 , supra.) … Scott v. Browning Business Serv., supra) for a total sum of $1,006.40. See also CPLR 7108 (subd.

Opinion No. 72-231 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1972

Potter v. LaMunyon, 389 F.2d 874 (10th Cir. 1968); Mills v. Smith, Okl., 355 P.2d 1064 , 82 A.L.R.2d 1144 (1960). … Article V, Section 11, Article V, Section 15, Article V, Section 19, Okl. Const.

ABC Inc. and Combined Affiliates v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Tax Court · Sep 8, 2025

See Lommasson v. School Dist. … See Con-Way, Inc. & Affiliates v.

Dennis, Chrostopher v. Memphis. Light, Gas & Water

2020 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 7, 2020

Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Cmty. Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *10-11 (May 18, 2017). … Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wik. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *31 (Jan. 30, 2018). Although Dr.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1998

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297,302 (Okla. 1968) (citation omitted). … Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision v. Migliaccio, 917 P.2d 483 , 486 (Okla.Ct.App. 1996), citing Marley v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 2005

Spearman v. Williams, 415 P.2d 597 , 600 (Okla. 1966) (citations omitted). In Jackson v. … Trapp v. Cook Constr. Co., 105 P. 667 , 669 (Okla. 1909) (emphasis added); see also Oliver v. Okla.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 8, 2003

White v. Wint, 638 P.2d 1109 , 1112-13 (Okla. 1981); Byars v. State, 102 P. 804 , (syllabus ¶ 1) (Okla.Crim. 1909). … Cartwright v.