Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.78s

  • Majestic Star Casino, LLC v. Blumenburg

    817 N.E.2d 322 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 12, 2004

    Ctr. of Evansville, Inc. v. … John V, 702 N.E.2d at 1042 . The Indiana Board's final determination with respect to this issue is therefore AF - FIRMED. II.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lane Sr., Antonio v. Securemedy, Inc.

    2020 TN WC App. 26 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 7, 2020

    ) v. ) State File No. 45081-2017 ) Securemedy, Inc., et al ) ) … Godkin delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge David F. Hensley joined.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 4, 2000

    See Sharp v. … See Nauni v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2009)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 2009

    City of Durant v. Cicio , 50 P.3d 218 , 221 (Okla. 2002). "Courts will give the words of a statute a plain and ordinary meaning, unless a contrary intention plainly appears." Id . … By definition, a conservation district board is not a "state board" or "state commission."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Indian Industries, Inc. v. Department of Local Government Finance

    791 N.E.2d 286 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 30, 2003

    STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to the final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Thousand Trails, Inc. v. … See Park Steckley I v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 779 N.E.2d 1270, 1273 (Ind. Tax Ct.2002); Blackbird Farms v. Dep’t of Local Gov. Fin., 765 N.E.2d 711, 714 (Ind. Tax Ct.2002).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ennis v. Department of Local Government Finance

    835 N.E.2d 1119 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 12, 2005

    Co. v. Indiana Bd. of Tax Review, 779 N.E.2d 986, 988 (Ind. … See TR. 8(C); Lee v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shurina, George v. FedEx Ground

    2025 TN WC App. 64 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 30, 2025

    Gregory Joseph Shurina, Decedent Employee State File No. 16323-2021 v. … In Grose v. Stone, No. W2023-00090-COA-R3-CV, 2024 Tenn. App. LEXIS 186 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1990

    ROTRAMEL V. PUBLIC SERVICE CO., 546 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1975). TEXAS OKLAHOMA EXPRESS V. SORENSON, 652 P.2D 285, 257 (OKLA. 1982) (DICTA). … SEE, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY V. KING, 381 P.2D 153 (OKLA. 1963).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Baptist Church v. City of Fort Worth

    26 S.W.2d 196 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 9, 1930

    Biencourt v. Parker, 27 Tex. 558 ; Odem v. Sinton Independent School District (Tex. Com. App.) 234 S. W. 1090 . … See, also, Allen v. Fidelity Co., 269 Ill. 234 , 109 N. E. 1035 ; Hatfield v. Mingo County Court, 80 W. Va. 165 , 92 S. E. 245 ; State v. Powell, 109 Ohio St. 383 , 142 N. E. 401 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • RAY, HEATHER v. CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

    2026 TN WC 79 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 4, 2026

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE HEATHER RAY, Docket No. 2026-30-1015 Employee, v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Probate of the Will of Knapp

    1 Pow. Surr. 167 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 12, 1893

    And that view of the law is sustained by the courts of this State in the cases of Storms will, 3 Redf. 327 , and Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 . … In Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Southern Kansas Ry. Co. v. Shinn

    207 S.W. 87 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 21, 1918

    The lever that operates this board is on that desk that sits in the bay window. When an incoming train whistles for the board, the man that is sitting there operating the board does his duty. … Joske v. Irvine, 91 Tex. 574 , 44 S. W. 1059 . We are of opinion that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding the testimony of the station agent sufficient to go to the jury on the question of the operator’s duty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Huwang v. Hillside Township

    21 N.J. Tax 496 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 13, 2004

    [Schneider v. … Cohen v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Grading

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 18, 2010

    Ralph Maxy, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, on May 23, 2008. During his deposition, Dr. Maxy compared the findings of Dr. Myles' May 5, 2008, note with his note of May 23, 2008. According to Dr. … Stat. § 97-22 ; Gregory v. W.A. Brown Sons , 363 N.C. 750 , 688 S.E.2d 431 (2010); Richardson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Strickland, Carolyn v. Aramark

    2016 TN WC 262 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 4, 2016

    ) Judge Thomas Wyatt v. ) Ace American Ins. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chambers v. Winn

    154 S.W.2d 454 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 16, 1941

    Brown v. Mitchell et al., 88 Tex. 350 , 31 S.W. 621 , 36 L.R.A. 64 ; Pickering v. Harris, Tex.Com.App., 23 S.W.2d 316 ; McCormick & Ray on Evidence,, p. 806, sec. 637. … Campbell, Tex.Civ.App., 215 S.W. 134, 138 , writ refused, and predicated upon its more general pronouncement in Brown v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • City of Hackensack v. Hackensack Trust Co.

    19 N.J. Misc. 260 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 4, 1941

    Petitioner’s reliance upon City of Newark v. … But see City of Garfield v. Forstmann Woolen Co., Id., p. 740. The petitions are dismissed for the reasons stated.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gray, Katie v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Co., Inc.

    2020 TN WC App. 24 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 3, 2020

    Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Pele I. Godkin joined. Jonathan L. … In Williams v. Ajax Turner Co., No. M2016- 00638-SC-R3-WC, 2017 Tenn. LEXIS 204 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Apr. 12, 2017), the employee alleged a work-related left foot injury. Id. at *1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SELLS, GREGORY S. v. NOVOLEX HOLDINGS, LLC

    2025 TN WC 78 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 7, 2025

    The Appeals Board set out the standard of proof in an expedited hearing in Buchanan v. Carlex Glass Co., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … This case also bears some similarity to the Board’s recent decision in McGuire v. TC Restaurants, LLC, No. 2025-60-0654, 2025 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS __, slip op. at 4-5 (Nov. 5, 2025).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Galway's Estate

    43 N.Y.S. 970 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1896

    Moore v. Moore, 3 Abb. … Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ; Ross v. Hardin, 79 N. Y. 84 ; Lynn v. Smith, 35 Hun, 275 ; Collyer v. Collyer, 113 N. Y. 442 , 21 N. E. 114 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.