Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.78s
Majestic Star Casino, LLC v. Blumenburg
817 N.E.2d 322 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 12, 2004
Ctr. of Evansville, Inc. v. … John V, 702 N.E.2d at 1042 . The Indiana Board's final determination with respect to this issue is therefore AF - FIRMED. II.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLane Sr., Antonio v. Securemedy, Inc.
2020 TN WC App. 26 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 7, 2020
) v. ) State File No. 45081-2017 ) Securemedy, Inc., et al ) ) … Godkin delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge David F. Hensley joined.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 4, 2000
See Sharp v. … See Nauni v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 2009
City of Durant v. Cicio , 50 P.3d 218 , 221 (Okla. 2002). "Courts will give the words of a statute a plain and ordinary meaning, unless a contrary intention plainly appears." Id . … By definition, a conservation district board is not a "state board" or "state commission."
Cited 0 timesPublishedIndian Industries, Inc. v. Department of Local Government Finance
791 N.E.2d 286 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 30, 2003
STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to the final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Thousand Trails, Inc. v. … See Park Steckley I v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 779 N.E.2d 1270, 1273 (Ind. Tax Ct.2002); Blackbird Farms v. Dep’t of Local Gov. Fin., 765 N.E.2d 711, 714 (Ind. Tax Ct.2002).
Cited 3 timesPublishedEnnis v. Department of Local Government Finance
835 N.E.2d 1119 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 12, 2005
Co. v. Indiana Bd. of Tax Review, 779 N.E.2d 986, 988 (Ind. … See TR. 8(C); Lee v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedShurina, George v. FedEx Ground
2025 TN WC App. 64 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 30, 2025
Gregory Joseph Shurina, Decedent Employee State File No. 16323-2021 v. … In Grose v. Stone, No. W2023-00090-COA-R3-CV, 2024 Tenn. App. LEXIS 186 (Tenn. Ct. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1990
ROTRAMEL V. PUBLIC SERVICE CO., 546 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1975). TEXAS OKLAHOMA EXPRESS V. SORENSON, 652 P.2D 285, 257 (OKLA. 1982) (DICTA). … SEE, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY V. KING, 381 P.2D 153 (OKLA. 1963).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst Baptist Church v. City of Fort Worth
26 S.W.2d 196 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 9, 1930
Biencourt v. Parker, 27 Tex. 558 ; Odem v. Sinton Independent School District (Tex. Com. App.) 234 S. W. 1090 . … See, also, Allen v. Fidelity Co., 269 Ill. 234 , 109 N. E. 1035 ; Hatfield v. Mingo County Court, 80 W. Va. 165 , 92 S. E. 245 ; State v. Powell, 109 Ohio St. 383 , 142 N. E. 401 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedRAY, HEATHER v. CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
2026 TN WC 79 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 4, 2026
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE HEATHER RAY, Docket No. 2026-30-1015 Employee, v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Probate of the Will of Knapp
1 Pow. Surr. 167 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 12, 1893
And that view of the law is sustained by the courts of this State in the cases of Storms will, 3 Redf. 327 , and Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 . … In Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSouthern Kansas Ry. Co. v. Shinn
207 S.W. 87 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 21, 1918
The lever that operates this board is on that desk that sits in the bay window. When an incoming train whistles for the board, the man that is sitting there operating the board does his duty. … Joske v. Irvine, 91 Tex. 574 , 44 S. W. 1059 . We are of opinion that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding the testimony of the station agent sufficient to go to the jury on the question of the operator’s duty.
Cited 1 timesPublished21 N.J. Tax 496 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 13, 2004
[Schneider v. … Cohen v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 18, 2010
Ralph Maxy, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, on May 23, 2008. During his deposition, Dr. Maxy compared the findings of Dr. Myles' May 5, 2008, note with his note of May 23, 2008. According to Dr. … Stat. § 97-22 ; Gregory v. W.A. Brown Sons , 363 N.C. 750 , 688 S.E.2d 431 (2010); Richardson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStrickland, Carolyn v. Aramark
2016 TN WC 262 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 4, 2016
) Judge Thomas Wyatt v. ) Ace American Ins. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review.
Cited 0 timesPublished154 S.W.2d 454 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 16, 1941
Brown v. Mitchell et al., 88 Tex. 350 , 31 S.W. 621 , 36 L.R.A. 64 ; Pickering v. Harris, Tex.Com.App., 23 S.W.2d 316 ; McCormick & Ray on Evidence,, p. 806, sec. 637. … Campbell, Tex.Civ.App., 215 S.W. 134, 138 , writ refused, and predicated upon its more general pronouncement in Brown v.
Cited 36 timesPublishedCity of Hackensack v. Hackensack Trust Co.
19 N.J. Misc. 260 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 4, 1941
Petitioner’s reliance upon City of Newark v. … But see City of Garfield v. Forstmann Woolen Co., Id., p. 740. The petitions are dismissed for the reasons stated.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGray, Katie v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Co., Inc.
2020 TN WC App. 24 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 3, 2020
Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Pele I. Godkin joined. Jonathan L. … In Williams v. Ajax Turner Co., No. M2016- 00638-SC-R3-WC, 2017 Tenn. LEXIS 204 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Apr. 12, 2017), the employee alleged a work-related left foot injury. Id. at *1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSELLS, GREGORY S. v. NOVOLEX HOLDINGS, LLC
2025 TN WC 78 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 7, 2025
The Appeals Board set out the standard of proof in an expedited hearing in Buchanan v. Carlex Glass Co., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … This case also bears some similarity to the Board’s recent decision in McGuire v. TC Restaurants, LLC, No. 2025-60-0654, 2025 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS __, slip op. at 4-5 (Nov. 5, 2025).
Cited 0 timesPublished43 N.Y.S. 970 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1896
Moore v. Moore, 3 Abb. … Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ; Ross v. Hardin, 79 N. Y. 84 ; Lynn v. Smith, 35 Hun, 275 ; Collyer v. Collyer, 113 N. Y. 442 , 21 N. E. 114 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna