Case law

Hackensack Water Co. v. Borough of Haworth

19 N.J. Misc. 217 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 4, 1941

Emerson v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1928), 6 N. J. Mis. R. 326; 141 Atl. Rep. 23 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. Borough of Haworth, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 604. … State Board (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 133; 183 Atl. Rep. 866 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1939), 122 N. J. L. 596; 7 Atl.

College Corner, L.P. v. Department of Local Government Finance

840 N.E.2d 905 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 19, 2006

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Hamstra Builders, Inc. v. … Dist. v.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 2011

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Moreover, legislative intent must be determined from the entire act. In re Blain , 172 P.2d 795 , 799 (Okla. 1946). … Boards), between a non state agency board and a state agency (the Eastern Red Cedar Registry Board and the Board of Agriculture) and between two state agencies (the Pet Breeders Board and the Veterinary Board).

Terry, Anthony v. Whaley's Towing

2020 TN WC 66 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 8, 2020

To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Webb, Margie v. Blakeford Management Services, Inc.

2024 TN WC 32 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 10, 2024

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Margie Webb, ) Docket No. 2022-06-2036 Employee, ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Romag Realty Corp. v. Saunders

77 Misc. 2d 11 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 9, 1974

(Maguire v. Ardea Realty Corp., 279 App. Div. 904 ; Tomblin v. 1459 Univ. Corp., N. Y. L. J.; March 26, 1953, p. 1014, col. 3, affd. 283 App. Div. 653 ; Romanisky v. Siglon Realty Corp., 122 N. Y. S. 2d 171; Harris v. … As was stated in Matter of Cantelli v.

Steven R. J. v. Nancy J.

117 Misc. 2d 725 · New York Family Court · Feb 3, 1983

(Brown v Brown, 71 Misc 2d 818, 821 , affd 39 AD2d 897 , app dsmd 31 NY2d 956 .) … (Matter of Newham v Chile Exploration Co., 232 NY 37 ; Goldman v Goldman, 282 NY 296 .)

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2011

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board's recommendation is advisory only and not binding on the Governor. Jerry, Jr. v. … In Wright v. Page , 414 P.2d 570 , 573 (Okla. Crim. App. 1966), the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board cannot grant a parole on its own action.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Wright

4 S.W.2d 31 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 28, 1928

For good cause the board may, in meritorious cases, waive the strict compliance with the foregoing limitations as to notice, and the filing the claim before the board.” Rev. Civ. Stat. 1925, art. 8307, § 4a. … Ormsby v. Ratcliffe (Tex. Sup.) 1 S. W. (2d) 1084 ; Bulin v. Smith (Tex. Com. App.) 1 S. W. (2d) 591 .

Three Fountains West, Inc.v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Three Fountains Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Troy Manor Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Bernstein v. City of Atlantic City

15 N.J. Tax 576 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 17, 1996

Schneider v. … In Inwood Owners, Inc. v.

McCool, Martha v. PROFESSIONAL CARE SERVICES

2025 TN WC 20 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 23, 2025

Petty v. Convention Production Rigging, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 95, at *20 (Dec. 29, 2016). … Bassham v. Lowes Home, Centers, 2023 TN Wrk Comp App Bd LEXIS 19, at *4-5 (May 1, 2023).

Munyan, Bart C. v. PCL Industrial Construction Co.

2016 TN WC 291 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2016

In considering PCL's Motion to Dismiss under the Rule .14(3) procedure, the Court is mindful of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's decision in Syph v. Choice Food Group, Inc., No. 2015-0600288,2016 TN Wrk. Comp. … The Appeals Board considered the adjudicatory standard applicable to motions for summary judgment filed in the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims in Payne v. D and D Electric, No. 2014-01-0023, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp.

Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of Christ Church in Short Hills v. Township of Millburn

26 N.J. Misc. 123 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 24, 1948

State Board of Tax Appeals, 131 N. J. L. 57; 34 Atl. Rep. (2d) 740; Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra. … To the same effect is Stevens Institute v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 1094; 130 Atl. Rep. 925 , decided in 1925.

Coombes v. Washington Township Assessor

901 N.E.2d 1180 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 27, 2009

The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board's final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind.Tax Ct.20083). … (Griffin v. Dep't of Local Gov't Fin., 794 N.E.2d 1171, 1176 (Ind.Tax Ct.2003) (citation omitted), review denied.

Skating Vanities Co. v. State

203 Misc. 779 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1953

But the power of the State Fund to depart from board rates has been expressly sustained (Andrews v. Goodman, 160 Misc. 664 , affd. N. Y. L. J., Nov. 5, 1938, p. 1498, col. 7; Miller v. … Co. v. Success Uncle Sam Cone Co. ( 124 Misc. 614, 616 ): “ The compensation inspection rating board mentioned in the policy of insurance and the endorsement (WCU 2630, N.

In Re Lokuta

964 A.2d 988 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2008

She said that it was because there was — Kay Faber does work for Senior Judge Brown, and he was doing an opinion concerning the Delesan-dro matter and Judge Lokuta. … V, § 18(a)(7) provides: The board shall receive and investigate complaints regarding judicial conduct filed by individuals or initiated by the board....

Burris, Stuart v. Amazon.com and WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc.

2025 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 12, 2025

See Houghton v. Aramark Educ. Res., 90 S.W.3d 676, 678-79 (Tenn. 2002) (citing Consumer Advocate Div. v. Greer, 967 S.W.2d 759, 762 (Tenn. 1998)). … Cooper v. Logistics Insights Corp., 395 S.W.3d 632, 643 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Martin v. Lear Corp., 90 S.W.3d 626, 632 (Tenn. 2002) (emphases added)).