Case law

Munsell v. Lewis

4 Hill & Den. 635 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · May 15, 1843

(a) Randal v. … See McCarty v. Leggett, ( 3 Hill, 134 .) As to tiie assignability of pay and pensions accruing .under grants from government, see Lam Magazine (London) Vol. 26, p. 350, et seq. See also Browning v.

Lakes of the Four Seasons Property Owners' Ass'n v. Department of Local Government Finance

875 N.E.2d 833 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 29, 2007

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Endowment Corp. v. Lake County Prop. … See Hometowne Assocs. v. Maley, 839 N.E.2d 269, 277 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005).

Keane v. Township of Monroe

25 N.J. Tax 479 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 25, 2010

See, e.g., Switz v. … Becker, Inc. v.

Jones v. Department of Revenue

12 Or. Tax 237 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 11, 1992

T & R Service Inc. v. Commission, 3 OTR 271, 273 (1968). … Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Heine, 8 OTR 221, 225 (1979), aff’d *242 289 Or 909 , 618 P2d 960 (1980).

McLaughlin v. Sandoz Chemical Corp.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 13, 1998

Patefield, who is board certified in pulmonary and internal medicine, began treating plaintiff on August 25, 1993. Dr. … Brown v Family Dollar Distribution Center, (COA 97-306, filed 30 April 1998); Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture Industries, 124 N.C.

Montgomery v. STATE BD. OF TAX COM'RS

708 N.E.2d 936 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 14, 1999

Barnes v. … See Board of Sch. Comm'rs v.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 2011

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Moreover, legislative intent must be determined from the entire act. In re Blain , 172 P.2d 795 , 799 (Okla. 1946). … Boards), between a non state agency board and a state agency (the Eastern Red Cedar Registry Board and the Board of Agriculture) and between two state agencies (the Pet Breeders Board and the Veterinary Board).

Loft Realty Co. v. Aky Hat Corp.

123 Misc. 2d 440 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 9, 1984

(the Board) was imminent with respect to the claim. … (See Corris v 129 Front Co., 85 AD2d 176; Lipkis v Pikus, 99 Misc 2d 518 , affd 72 AD2d 697 ; Mandel v Pitkowsky, 102 Misc 2d 478 , affd 76 AD2d 807 .)

Bernstein v. City of Atlantic City

15 N.J. Tax 576 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 17, 1996

Schneider v. … In Inwood Owners, Inc. v.

Baldwin, Donald v. Evers Construction Co., Inc.

2021 TN WC 211 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 5, 2021

LEXIS 74, at *22-25 (July 11, 2016), the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board concluded that the definition of the term “wage” as set forth by the Supreme Court in Powell v. … . & HVAC, 78 8.W.3d 893, 898 (Tenn. 2002), and Wilkins v.

Hutchison v. STATE BD. OF TAX COM'RS

520 N.E.2d 1281 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 21, 1988

Public Service Commission v. City of Indianapolis (1956), 235 Ind. 70, 83 , 131 N.E.2d 308, 313 (emphasis added). See also Cooper v. County Board of Review of Grant County (1971), 150 Ind. … App. 232 , 276 N.E.2d 533, 539 ; State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Oliverius (1973), 156 Ind. App. 46 , 294 N.E.2d 646, 648 .

Opinion No. 76-354 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 1976

for the Board to take action pursuant to Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution, and the Board is without the authority to specify a greater number of votes to be required for the Board to take action. … A majority vote of a quorum of the Board on Legislative Compensation is required for the Board to take action pursuant to Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution, and the Board is without the authority to specify

In re Jennings

192 A.3d 372 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2018

v. … See also Meth v.

Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Departnment of Local Government Finance

820 N.E.2d 787 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 23, 2004

(Glass Wholesalers, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 568 N.E.2d 1116, 1122 (Ind. Tax Ct.1991) (internal quotation and citation omitted). … Corp. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 525 N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind. Tax Ct.1988). See also Western Select Prop. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 639 N.E.2d 1068, 1073 (Ind.

People v. Aboaf

187 Misc. 2d 173 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jan 23, 2001

In Brown v Socialist Workers ‘74 Campaign Comm. ( 459 US 87 [1982]), the Socialist Workers Party challenged the constitutionality of the disclosure provisions of the Ohio Campaign Expense Reporting Law that required every … Although the defendants here rely on the holdings in NAACP and Brown (supra), they have offered no evidence of a pattern of harassment against them such as compelled the Court in NAACP and Brown to bar disclosure.

Coombes v. Washington Township Assessor

901 N.E.2d 1180 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 27, 2009

The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board's final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind.Tax Ct.20083). … (Griffin v. Dep't of Local Gov't Fin., 794 N.E.2d 1171, 1176 (Ind.Tax Ct.2003) (citation omitted), review denied.

Skating Vanities Co. v. State

203 Misc. 779 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1953

But the power of the State Fund to depart from board rates has been expressly sustained (Andrews v. Goodman, 160 Misc. 664 , affd. N. Y. L. J., Nov. 5, 1938, p. 1498, col. 7; Miller v. … Co. v. Success Uncle Sam Cone Co. ( 124 Misc. 614, 616 ): “ The compensation inspection rating board mentioned in the policy of insurance and the endorsement (WCU 2630, N.

Southwood Cooperative, Inc.v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

In Re Lokuta

964 A.2d 988 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2008

She said that it was because there was — Kay Faber does work for Senior Judge Brown, and he was doing an opinion concerning the Delesan-dro matter and Judge Lokuta. … V, § 18(a)(7) provides: The board shall receive and investigate complaints regarding judicial conduct filed by individuals or initiated by the board....

In re the Estate of Mahlstedt

140 Misc. 245 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 13, 1931

(Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201, 209 .) There is no express gift to the executors and no direction for them to receive or apply the income. … The gift is to be taken as it is made or not at all (Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y. 136, 143 ; Dinan v. Coneys, 143 N. Y. 544, 547 ).” (Allegheny Col. v. Nat. Chautauqua Co. Bank, 246 N.