Case law

Three Fountains Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Troy Manor Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Three Fountains West, Inc.v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Decristoforo v. Givens

2015 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Business Court · May 29, 2015

The DeCristoforos also informed the Board of Directors that Givens was verbally abusive to V. … (alteration in original) (quoting Dishner Developers, Inc. v. Brown, 145 N.C. App. 375, 378, 549 S.E.2d 904, 906 (2001))). VI.

City of Jersey City v. Harborside Warehouse Co.

19 N.J. Misc. 222 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 21, 1941

State Board (Supreme Court, 1886), 49 N. J. L. 1; 7 Atl. Rep. 306 ; and see Turnley v. Elizabeth (Supreme Court 1908), 76 N. J. L. 42; 68 Atl. Rep. 1094 ; Theodore Schetty v. … Second National Bank and Trust Company of Red Bank v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1935), 114 N. J. L. 573; 178 Atl. Rep. 96 ; General Motors Corp. v.

Burris, Stuart v. Amazon.com and WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc.

2025 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 12, 2025

See Houghton v. Aramark Educ. Res., 90 S.W.3d 676, 678-79 (Tenn. 2002) (citing Consumer Advocate Div. v. Greer, 967 S.W.2d 759, 762 (Tenn. 1998)). … Cooper v. Logistics Insights Corp., 395 S.W.3d 632, 643 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Martin v. Lear Corp., 90 S.W.3d 626, 632 (Tenn. 2002) (emphases added)).

Mase Land Co. v. Jefferson Township

20 N.J. Tax 439 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 4, 2002

In Gale Builders, Inc. v. Hunterdon Cty. … In Throckmorton v.

Gao v. Sinova Specialties, Inc.

2018 NCBC 72 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 16, 2018

Gao v. Sinova Specialties, Inc., 2018 NCBC 72. … Liu allege that Gao breached the 2012 Board Agreement and the 2014 Board Agreement.4 (Heckmann’s Am.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 2009

board." … V , § 36 ; Okla. Const. art. VII-B , §§ 3 , 4 ; Oliver v. Okla. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. , 359 P.2d 183 , 185 (Okla. 1961); Spearman v. Williams , 415 P.2d 597 , 600 (Okla. 1966); Bd. of Regents v.

In re the Estate of Prince

141 Misc. 600 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 20, 1931

Whitney v. Loughman, 226 App. Div. 108 ; Matter of Lee v. Gilchrist, 215 id. 576.) … In Brown v. Brown ( 122 App. Div. 576 ) the executors became partners and, of course, profit belonging to the estate passed to the life beneficiary as income.

In re the Appraisal of the Estate of Moore

7 Mills Surr. 373 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1910

Institute for Blind v. Pitch, 154 N. … Board of Charities v. N. Y. Society Prevention Cruelty Children, 162 N.

City of Camden v. Camden Masonic Ass'n

9 N.J. Tax 331 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 7, 1987

Jersey City v. … [Little Egg Harbor Tp. v.

MCCOOL, MARTHA v. PROFESSIONAL CARE SERVICES

2025 TN WC 59 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 13, 2025

.: 2022-08-0687 Employee, ) v. ) PROFESSIONAL CARE SERVICES, ) State File No.: 99553-2019 Employer, ) And … The Appeals Board has not offered guidance on the definition of “unreasonable” in this context since the statutory change.

South Plainfield Borough v. Kentile Floors, Inc.

183 N.J. Super. 359 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 15, 1981

In Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v. … Hudson Terrace Apartments v. Fort Lee, 2 N.J.Tax 457 (Tax Ct. 1981). In Springfield Tp. v.

In re the Estate of Brown

9 Mills Surr. 434 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 15, 1912

Brown. … Bloodgood v. Brown, 8 N. Y. 826 ; Butler v. Johnson, 111 id. 204.

Loft Realty Co. v. Aky Hat Corp.

123 Misc. 2d 440 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 9, 1984

(the Board) was imminent with respect to the claim. … (See Corris v 129 Front Co., 85 AD2d 176; Lipkis v Pikus, 99 Misc 2d 518 , affd 72 AD2d 697 ; Mandel v Pitkowsky, 102 Misc 2d 478 , affd 76 AD2d 807 .)

Harvard Square Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 2011

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Moreover, legislative intent must be determined from the entire act. In re Blain , 172 P.2d 795 , 799 (Okla. 1946). … Boards), between a non state agency board and a state agency (the Eastern Red Cedar Registry Board and the Board of Agriculture) and between two state agencies (the Pet Breeders Board and the Veterinary Board).

Munsell v. Lewis

4 Hill & Den. 635 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · May 15, 1843

(a) Randal v. … See McCarty v. Leggett, ( 3 Hill, 134 .) As to tiie assignability of pay and pensions accruing .under grants from government, see Lam Magazine (London) Vol. 26, p. 350, et seq. See also Browning v.

Lakes of the Four Seasons Property Owners' Ass'n v. Department of Local Government Finance

875 N.E.2d 833 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 29, 2007

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Endowment Corp. v. Lake County Prop. … See Hometowne Assocs. v. Maley, 839 N.E.2d 269, 277 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005).