Case law

West Essex Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Montville Township

16 N.J. Tax 152 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 27, 1996

VSH Realty Inc. v. Harding Tp., 291 N.J.Super. 295 , 677 A.2d 274 (App.Div.1996). The defendant’s motion was then rescheduled. … In *156 Pipquarryco, Inc. v.

In re Thomasine Tynes Former Judge Philadelphia Traffic Court Philadelphia County

149 A.3d 452 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 2016

THE BOARD’S COMPLAINT The Board’s complaint has its genesis in two criminal convictions. … By information filed at Commonwealth v.

People v. Merced

119 Misc. 2d 238 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · May 2, 1983

In People v Brown ( 83 AD2d 699 ), the Third Department found that notice had been given in time so as not to frustrate the statutory purpose to permit a preparation of a challenge, if any, to the voluntariness of the statement … Reference to the text of the amendment and its legislative history demonstrates that the rule in the Third Department as set forth in People v Brown (supra) is sounder than the rule in the Fourth Department.

Borough of North Arlington v. Riverview Gardens

26 N.J. Misc. 72 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 6, 1948

Englewood v. Hopper, 54 N. J. L. 544; 23 Atl. Rep. 948 . … In the absence of such an allegation, the county board was without power to hear the appeals. If the county board was not vested with jurisdiction to hear the appeals, neither are we. Oradell v.

Thomas v. Commission

3 Or. Tax 333 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 27, 1968

Barnes, Sr. et al v. … Hamilton v. Adkins, supra.

Texas Employers' Ins. v. Morgan

295 S.W. 588 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 4, 1927

Williams v. Vauxhall, 97 L. T. (N. S.) 559, 1907 (2 K. B. 433), cited in note Ann. Cas. 19Í5B,' 831. … primary award of the board can have.

College Corner, L.P. v. Department of Local Government Finance

840 N.E.2d 905 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 19, 2006

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Hamstra Builders, Inc. v. … Dist. v.

Riley-Roberts Park, Lp v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

the State Board to resolve. … See Johnson v.

Phillipsburg Riverview Organization, Inc. v. Town of Phillipsburg

26 N.J. Tax 167 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 16, 2011

This court observes that County Boards of Taxation are quasi-judicial bodies but not courts within the intent and meaning of R. 1:21—1 (c). Vicari v. … The Board never determined whether PRO could appear pro se or whether R. 1:21-1 (c) was applicable to proceedings before County Boards of Taxation. See arguendo Stack v. P.G.

Jenkins, Dennis v. TYSON FOODS, INC.

2024 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 25, 2024

In Carrillo v. Hurtado, TN Wrk. 1 Tyson offered a letter from the authorized physician denying causation as an exhibit at the hearing. 1 Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Chris Kannady, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 91

2024 OK AG 10 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 2024

Brown v. City of Warr Acres , 1997 OK 117, ¶ 17, 946 P.2d 1140, 1144. … Brown, 1997 OK 117, ¶ 17, 946 P.2d at 1144 (quoting, in part, Dixon v. Shaw , 1927 OK 24, ¶ 5, 253 P.500, 501).

In re Ciavarella

108 A.3d 983 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 2014

The Board has charged that Respondent’s conduct and multiple felony convictions subject him to discipline under Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. … This policy, as explained by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988), and Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v.

Grandville Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Township of Cherry Hill v. United States Life Insurance

176 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 20, 1980

The prior action of the county board, while entitled to a presumption of correctness, North Bergen Twp., Hudson County v. Dieckmann’s Estate, 37 N.J.Super. 221 (App. … In State v.

In re the Estate of Schuster

167 Misc. 194 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 22, 1938

(Young v. Hill, 67 N. Y. 162 ; Brown v. Knapp, 79 id. 136; Ellis v. Sullivan, 241 Mass. 60 ; 134 N. E. 695 ; Cherokee Nation v. United States, 270 U. S. 476 .) … (Brown v. Knapp, supra.)

Arol Development Corp. v. Goodie Brand Packing Corp.

83 Misc. 2d 477 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 3, 1975

(Despard v Wallbridge, 15 NY 374 ; Cohen v Carpenter, 128 App Div 862 ; Drake v Cunningham, 127 App Div 79 .) … V .

Munyan, Bart C. v. PCL Industrial Construction Co.

2016 TN WC 291 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2016

In considering PCL's Motion to Dismiss under the Rule .14(3) procedure, the Court is mindful of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's decision in Syph v. Choice Food Group, Inc., No. 2015-0600288,2016 TN Wrk. Comp. … The Appeals Board considered the adjudicatory standard applicable to motions for summary judgment filed in the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims in Payne v. D and D Electric, No. 2014-01-0023, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp.

Goodwin, Charles R. v. Morristown Drivers Services, Inc.

2019 TN WC 119 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 2, 2019

GOODWIN, ) Docket No. 2017-03-1235 Employee, ) v. ) MORRISTOWN DRIVERS ) SERVICES, INC., … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Larsen, Danny v. Walker Truck Contractors, Inc.

2020 TN WC 6 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 20, 2020

In Burchfield v. Renfree, 2013 Tenn. App. LEXIS 685 (Tenn. Ct. App. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Three Fountains Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.