Case law

Harris v. State

187 Misc. 2d 512 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 22, 2001

AIDS-phobia actions are based on the common-law tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (Brown v New York City Health & Hosps. … This can be achieved by proving (1) a means of transmission that is scientifically accepted as capable of conveying the virus, and (2) the presence of blood or other fluid that is HIV-positive (Brown v New York City Health

West Essex Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Montville Township

16 N.J. Tax 152 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 27, 1996

VSH Realty Inc. v. Harding Tp., 291 N.J.Super. 295 , 677 A.2d 274 (App.Div.1996). The defendant’s motion was then rescheduled. … In *156 Pipquarryco, Inc. v.

Heart City Chrysler/Lockmandy Motors v. Department of Local Government Finance

801 N.E.2d 215 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 12, 2004

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to the final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Hamstra Builders, Inc. v. … On April 24, 1998, this Court issued an opinion in Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 694 N.E.2d 1230 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998).

Weber v. State

104 Misc. 2d 947 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1980

In O’Rourke v Long ( 41 NY2d 219 ), the court held that if a case was likely to fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), plaintiff bore the burden of pleading and proving the absence … Although the court remains a "jurisdictionally competent forum” to determine the applicability of compensation until a proceeding is commenced before the Board (see Takacs v Food Stop Markets, 61 AD2d 917 ), we believe that

Roy, David v. Kenan Advantage Group

2023 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 1, 2023

You have fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to file a brief to the Appeals Board. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

Kooshtard Property VI, LLC v. White River Township Assessor

836 N.E.2d 501 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 3, 2005

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Miller Village Prop. Co. v. … The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board's final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. Osolo Township Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs. L.P., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003).

Jenkins, William v. Toyota Material Handling Midsouth

2024 TN WC 63 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 5, 2024

The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … Date of Injury: _____________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Employee v.

Thomas v. Commission

3 Or. Tax 333 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 27, 1968

Barnes, Sr. et al v. … Hamilton v. Adkins, supra.

Borough of Rumson v. Haran

3 N.J. Tax 590 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 4, 1981

The Legislature did not use “assessed valuation” for hearings before the county board of taxation and “judgment of the county board of taxation” for hearings before the Tax Court. In Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. … At no place in the opiniott is there any reference to the judgment of the county board of taxation. *596 In Feder v.

Indianapolis Racquet Club, Inc. v. Marion County Assessor

15 N.E.3d 150 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 21, 2014

Co. v. Maley, 803 N.E.2d 276, 281 (Ind. Tax Ct.2004), review denied. Accordingly, the final determination of the Indiana Board is AFFIRMED. … See also Fesler v.

In Re Toczydlowski

853 A.2d 24 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2004

Respondent’s cooperation with the Judicial Conduct Board in its investigation and prosecution of this case, 1 6. … Const., Article V, § 10(c) and In re Malograne, 571 Pa. 490 , 812 A.2d 1164 , 1169 (2002) and Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jepsen, 567 Pa. 459 , 787 A.2d 420, 425 (2002).

Gantler v. Trumbull Cty. Aud.

2024 Ohio 5311 · Ohio Court of Claims · Oct 15, 2024

Lanham v. Smith, 2007-Ohio-609, ¶ 11. The evidence establishes that no minutes of the Board’s proceedings were created. Requester’s Evidence, pp. 7-8; Respondent’s Evidence, pp. 5-6. … Helfrich v.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 16, 2009

Ethics Comm'n v. Keating , 958 P.2d 1250 , 1256 (Okla. 1998). II. … Shipp v. Se. Okla. Indus. Auth. , 498 P.2d 1395 , 1398 (Okla. 1972).

Grandville Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Jenkins, Dennis v. TYSON FOODS, INC.

2024 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 25, 2024

In Carrillo v. Hurtado, TN Wrk. 1 Tyson offered a letter from the authorized physician denying causation as an exhibit at the hearing. 1 Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Arol Development Corp. v. Goodie Brand Packing Corp.

83 Misc. 2d 477 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 3, 1975

(Despard v Wallbridge, 15 NY 374 ; Cohen v Carpenter, 128 App Div 862 ; Drake v Cunningham, 127 App Div 79 .) … V .

Ziegler v. Hunt

280 S.W. 546 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 10, 1926

As stated by Chief Justice Brown in the case of Heflin v. Railway Co., 155 8. … This is definitely decided by Chief Justice Brown in the case of Heflin v. Railway Company, supra.

Rollins, Kelly v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

2021 TN WC 234 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 15, 2021

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

In re the Estate of Richards

150 Misc. 102 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 12, 1934

(Hennessy v. Patterson, 85 N. Y. 91 ; McLean v. McLean, 207 id. 365; Matter of Brown, supra; Matter of White, supra.) … (Matter of Bump, supra; Matter of Banker, supra; Matter of Brown, supra; McLean v. McLean, supra; Ham v. Van Orden, 84 N. Y. 257 ; Crooke v. County of Kings, 97 id. 421; Griffin v. Shepard, 124 id. 70; Clowe v.

Skakandy v. State

188 Misc. 214 · New York Court of Claims · Oct 9, 1946

All questions of fact in compensation proceedings are determined by the State Industrial Board (now Workmen’s Compensation Board) or referee. (Matter of Archer v. Cole, 244 App. Div. 848 .) … (Workmen’s Compensation Law, §§ 20, 23, 54, subds. 1, 2; Royal Indemnity Co. v. Heller, 256 N. Y. 322 ). For other cases on' the powers and jurisdiction of the board see: Matter of Di Donato v. Rosenberg, 256 N.