Case law

Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Lawrence L Mock

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

Tippecanoe County Assessor v. D and J Black Second Limited Partnership

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

Tippecanoe County Assessor v. D and J Black Second Limited Partnership

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Olav Lund-Mikkelsen

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Terry S & Jane C Stewart TTEES

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025

Nonetheless, the Court also noted that a non-attorney’s expertise in the assessment process does not make them qualified in the practice of law, specifically referencing constitutional claims as a type of issue that qualifies … Some of Grossman’s claims appear to be constitutional in nature and clearly constitute the practice of law.

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Denke

95 S.W.2d 370 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 17, 1936

agency, and I agree that out of any salary that may become due me the company shall first reimburse itself for any cost it may incur in furnishing me with a certificate of authority, license or other expense necessary to qualify … It demonstrates clearly how the doctrine here announced as applicable to salesmen and insurance agents has developed as a departure from the rigid rule applicable in cases of master and servant.

Associated Insurance Companies, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

655 N.E.2d 1271 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 29, 1995

The language which the Department cites does not clearly indicate that the legislature intended to depart from its "single taxpayer" policy. … Const. § 47.33 (5th Ed.1992) ("[rleferential and qualifying words and phrases, where no contrary intention appears, refer solely to the last antecedent.")

Atlantic City Opera Theater v. City of Atlantic City

New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 17, 2021

The pictures provided by the taxpayer clearly depict opera performances taking place before an audience. Many of the opera performers are in costume. … Other proofs establish that the use of the property is residential in character.

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Burnham

115 Misc. 588 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1921

The evidence clearly shows that at the time the attorney arrived, she was in a critical condition. She was in extremis. … He who presents a will asserts that the testator was qualified by the statute to make it. Rollwagen v. Rollwagen, 63 N. Y. 504, 517 ; Dobie v.

In re the Estate of Tonkonogoff

177 Misc. 1015 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 17, 1941

An examination of these decisions shows that they clearly support the opinions expressed by these witnesses. (Petrovsky v. Ardi, Decisions of the Russian Ruling Senate, No. 647 of the year 1872; Kropotoff v. … The same conclusion would be reached if the limitation was in a different statute, provided it was directed to the newly created liability so specifically as to warrant saying that it qualified the right.”

Lewis v. Craven Regional Medical Center

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 8, 2009

As established by the prior Opinions of the Industrial Commission in this matter, Plaintiff suffered a herniated disc in his back on February 23, 1990, while working for Employer-Defendant. … Tanenberg opined that "clearly, [Plaintiff's] diabetic peripheral neuropathy and his peripheral vascular disease, which is causing him pain as well in the lower extremities, *Page 7 would . . . qualify him for disability.

Williams v. Bank of Michigan

7 Wend. 539 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1831

An act establishing a superior court in the city of New-York, would hardly be applicable, word for word, for the purpose of establishing a similar court in the city of Detroit; and this unnecessary in•congruity would manifestly … Such injustice should not be sanctioned under the forms of law, unless the law clearly requires it at our hands.

People v. Dillin

150 Misc. 2d 311 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 4, 1991

administration of the chemical test or suffer the adverse consequences of a refusal are designed, consistent with constitutional rights, to enable the authorities to remove intoxicated motorists from the roads by either establishing … Accordingly, our law clearly envisions that the threat of license revocation will induce submission to the test.

Vitaform, Inc. v. Aeroflow, Inc.

2022 NCBC 65 · North Carolina Business Court · Oct 27, 2022

“[W]hen information alleged to be a trade secret is clearly and easily obtained through a single publication, then the source of the actual knowledge the defendant used is not relevant.” … In TaiDoc, plaintiff took several additional steps to clearly identify the confidential nature of the individual documents at issue in that case, such as “affixing confidentiality labels on documents sent to [defendant],

Clark County Assessor v. Meijer Stores LP

119 N.E.3d 634 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 8, 2019

In it, the Indiana Board explained that because both Meijer and the Assessor presented USPAP-compliant appraisals from qualified experts, it needed to weigh the competing appraisals and determine which one was more persuasive … Tax Ct. 2010) (explaining that the Indiana Board abuses its discretion when it either misinterprets the law or when its final determination is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before

Egelhof v. Szulik

2008 NCBC 2 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 4, 2008

Egelhof’s diminutive stake in the litigation would most likely not qualify as making him the “most adequate plaintiff.” … Clearly, no one at the firm was concerned enough to even know how much stock he owned.

Tong v. Dunn Powell v. Dunn

2016 NCBC 49 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 8, 2016

{11} The Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ aiding-and-abetting claims against ENG and Engineous on March 19, 2012, based on the doctrine of intracorporate immunity, Tong, 2012 NCBC LEXIS 16, at *17–20, and dismissed Tong … Lloyd, which stated that [i]t is a firmly established rule that with certain exceptions, such as in the cases of covenants and indemnity contracts, the occurrence of an act or omission, whether it is

Grand Temple & Tabernacle in the State of Texas of the Knights & Daughters of Tabor of the International Order of Twelve v. Independent Order of Knights & Daughters of Tabor of America

44 S.W.2d 973 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

from the Secretary of State to organize and we were not put under the Commissioner of Insurance, and therefore we could take in members as we pleased,” and Eurlow, its grand Scribe, testified “our organization has never qualified … In that case, the evidence, having clearly established the fact that insured voluntarily shot himself, precluded the submission to the jury of the issue as to whether his act was intentional, justified a peremptory instruction

In re the Estate of Camac

2 Misc. 3d 894 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 8, 2004

The additional requirements to establish a claim based on a contract to make a will are stated in Matter of Guarino ( 13 Misc 2d 539, 541 [1958]) as follows: “However, in order to establish a claim on a contract to make a … Moreover, in order to establish such a claim against the decedent, the proof must be clear and convincing without transcending the ordinary rule requiring a claimant to establish the essentials of the claim by a fair preponderance

Rhodes v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 18, 2003

Thus, plaintiff has not established that he is entitled to an order of removal. … Further, plaintiff argues before the Commission that Austin does not require plaintiff to prove current exposure to the hazards of asbestos; however, Judge Greene's dissenting opinion, adopted by the Supreme Court, clearly