Case law

Parks v. Pickaway Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

2019 Ohio 1823 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 9, 2019

[Cite as Parks v. Pickaway Cty. Bd. Of Commrs., 2019-Ohio-1823.] MICHAEL R. PARKS Case No. 2018-01479PQ Requester Judge Patrick M. … McGrath v.

In re the Accounting of Sussdorff

182 Misc. 69 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 27, 1943

(Lovell v. Quitman, 88 N. Y. 377 ; Burnham v. Comfort, 108 N. Y. 535 ; Matter of Evans, 113 App. Div. 373 ; Matter of McGill, 229 N. Y. 405 ; Matter of Tremain, 282 N. … Eq. 888; In re Estate of Brown, 139 Iowa 219 ; Card v. Alexander, 48 Conn. 492 ; Gartin v. Gartin, 371 Ill. 418 .) There is no statute which bars a divorced spouse from taking under the will of a former spouse.

Brookview Gardens, Inc. v. Bergenfield Borough

4 N.J. Tax 625 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 24, 1982

In Galligan v. … In Kaczmarek v. N. J.

Futrell v. Bolch

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 5, 1995

Peele regarding the type of students on board, Ms. Megill failed to require the six (6) students riding that day to sit in their assigned seats. … Additionally, one (1) of the six (6) students on board the bus on 18 April 1991 was wheel-chair bound and therefore sat in the rear portion of the bus. 10. Ms.

In re the Estate of Lessig

168 Misc. 889 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 28, 1938

Upon the return day the only appearance made on behalf of the board was by a welfare worker, who was not an attorney, who merely asserted the claim of the board but tendered no proof in its substantiation. … Y. 508, 521, 522 ) and Brill v. Tuttle (81 id. 454, 457) and similar authorities.

In Re Eagen

814 A.2d 304 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2002

Section 18(d)(1) of Article V. … V, § 18(d)(1).

Noyes v. Department of Revenue

7 Or. Tax 325 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 30, 1978

As pointed out by the Oregon Supreme Court in Anaconda Company v. … Such an election was approved in Nepom v.

Florida Society of Professional Land Surveyors v. Department of Professional Regulation

10 Fla. Supp. 2d 154 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Dec 13, 1984

State v. Atlantic Coastline R.Co., 47 So. 969 (Fla. 1908). No agency can adopt a rule which amends, adds to, or conflicts with a statute. Seitz v. … Duval County School Board, 366 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert.den. 375 So.2d 911 ; State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v.

City of Elizabeth v. 264 First Street, LLC

28 N.J. Tax 408 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 23, 2015

Weinacht v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 3 N.J. 330, 333 , 70 A.2d 69 (1949)(quoting from Howard Savings Institution v. City of Newark, 63 N.J.L. 547 , 44 A. 654 (E & A.1899)). … board shall not serve to bar an affirmative claim for relief in the Tax Court. *447 Campbell Soup Co. v.

Southern Casualty Co. v. Todd

29 S.W.2d 973 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 28, 1930

to its records and it therefore declines to set the case for hearing at this time. “ ‘Tours very truly,. “ ‘Industrial Accident Board, “ ‘By- — , “ ‘ERB-e Secretary.’ … In the case of Jones v. Indemnity Insurance Company, 15 S.W.(2d) 1077, 1079 , the facts are almost identical with the facts in this case.

Allen v. Blanchard

9 Cow. 630 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1827

Judgment affirmed. ) Elliot & Brown had a joint demise of a farm the profits of which they divided annually. Held, on the death of Elliot, that his moiety went to his executors. (Executor of Elliot v. Brown, Cor. Ld.

In re Nocella

79 A.3d 766 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2013

v. … Most notable of the 24 cases undisclosed was the case Philadelphia Board of Ethics v.

Property Development Company Four, LLC v. Grant County Assessor

31 N.E.3d 1049 · Indiana Tax Court · May 12, 2015

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden to demonstrate that it is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. … Ass’n v. Indiana Dep’t of State Revenue, 568 N.E.2d 578, 583-84 (Ind.

In Re Judicial Review of Final Agency Decision of N.C. Bd. of Cpa Exam'rs

2017 NCBC 39 · North Carolina Business Court · May 1, 2017

The Court also reviewed the Board’s conclusions of law and concludes that they are supported by the Board’s findings of fact and free from errors of law. Rittelmeyer v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill, No. … Bd. of Dental Examiners v. FTC, 135 S. Ct. 1101 (2015).

In re the Estate of Carlisle

53 Misc. 2d 546 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 1, 1967

Brown, 30 N. Y. S. 2d 85 [1941].) … (Gordon v. Elliman, 306 N. Y. 456 ; Matter of Lander, 162 Misc. 201 [1937].)

Matter of Buckson

610 A.2d 203 · Court on the Judiciary of Delaware. · Jul 7, 1992

In Slawik v. … v.

Steckley v. Department of Local Government Finance

779 N.E.2d 1270 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 17, 2002

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to the final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Walker Mfg. Co. v. … Poracky v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 635 N.E.2d 235, 236 (Ind. Tax Ct.1994). Thus, this Court will construe terms within a land order only if they are ambiguous. See Zakutansky v.

In re the Appeals filed by the City of Jersey City

24 N.J. Misc. 315 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 3, 1946

James v. DuBois, 16 N. J. L. 285, 293; Steel v. Freeholders of Passaic, 89 Id. 609, 612; 99 Atl. Rep. 318 ; Household Finance Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 N. J. L. 230, 234; 196 Atl. Rep. 219 ; Diorio v. … See, also, Paret v. Bayonne, 39 Id. 559; Fleischauer v. West Hoboken, 40 Id. 109; Jones v. Landis Township, 50 Id. 374; 13 Atl. Rep. 251 ; McGovern v. Board of Public Works, 57 N. J. L. 580; 31 Atl. Rep. 613 ; App v.

In re Hyland's Will

27 N.Y.S. 961 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 19, 1892

Jackson v. Jackson, 39 *964 N. Y. 153 . … Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 ; In re Pepoon, 91 N. Y. 255 .

New York Susquehanna v. State Department of Treasury

6 N.J. Tax 575 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 21, 1984

Taxpayer also cites Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. Zinc, 136 N.J.L. 251 , 55 A.2d 237 (Sup.Ct.1947), and N.Y. Central R.R. Co. v. … Brunetti v. Borough of New Milford, 68 N.J. 576, 589 , 350 A.2d 19 (1975); Roadway Express, Inc. v. Kingsley, 37 N.J. 136, 141 , 179 A.2d 729 (1962); Naylor v. Harkins, 11 N.J. 435, 444 , 94 A.2d 825 (1953).