Case law

Centorino v. Tewksbury Township

18 N.J. Tax 303 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 25, 1999

In Brick Tp. v. … Brick Tp. v.

N.C. Acupuncture Licensing Bd. v. N.C. Bd. of Physical Therapy Exam'rs

2017 NCBC 66 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 2, 2017

Burgess v. … Presnell v.

Garrison Apartments, Inc. v. Sabourin

113 Misc. 2d 674 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 21, 1982

(See Hidden Harbour Estates v Norman, supra.) … This is a recitation of the well-known “business judgment” rule under which a court will not and should not tell the board of directors how to run the co-op. (423-443 Tenants Corp. v Kretchmer, NYLJ, Nov. 26, 1980, p 6, col

Alacqua v. Baudanza

110 Misc. 2d 774 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Sep 14, 1981

so that the issue could have been fully considered there (Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Syracuse, 44 AD2d 198, 202-203 , mod on other grounds 35 NY2d 534 ; Executive Law, §71; CPLR 1012 … (Matter of Fraser v Brown, 203 NY 136 ; see, also, Livoti v Fitzgerald, 255 App Div 711 , amd 255 App Div 720 ; Matter of Newton v Lewis, 118 Misc 382, 389 ; Association for Protection of Adirondacks v MacDonald, 253 NY 234

Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Melissa Provenzano, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 79

2025 OK AG 17 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 2025

Cox v. State , 2004 OK 17 87 P.3d 607 See also Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 1982 OK 74 648 P.2d 26 Liddell v. Heavner , 2008 OK 6 180 P.3d 1191 Signature Leasing v. … Those charges are expressly reserved for the CEQA, the State Board, and a local school district board of education. 70 O.S.Supp.2025, §§ 3-104 70 O.S.2021, § 5-117 Marley v.

Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Hayes

240 S.W. 904 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 10, 1922

Beckmann v. J. W. Oelerich & Son, 174 App. Div. 353 , 160 N. Y. S. 791. … Land & Trust Co. v. Cumley, 62 Tex. Civ. App. 306 , 132 S. W. 889 (writ of error denied).

Nancy A. Daw, Stephen L. Hoback, Co-Trustees of Sagacious Sentinel Sycamore Revocable Trust v. Hancock County Assessor

116 N.E.3d 1 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 5, 2018

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … See, e.g., United States v. U.S. Shoe Corp., 523 U.S. 360, 367 (1998); Sanford v. Walther, 467 S.W.3d 139, 145 (Ark. 2015); State v. Medeiros, 973 P.2d 736, 741 (Haw. 1999); City of Huntington v.

Wendy H Elwood Trust v. Bartholomew County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Aug 7, 2023

See Gertz v. Porter Cnty. Assessor, 187 N.E.3d 978, 984 n.8 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2022). … See, e.g., Riley-Roberts Park, LP v. O’Connor, 186 N.E.3d 162, 175 (Ind.

In re the probate of the Will of Baker

2 Redf. 179 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1876

In some cases, as this Court said, in the case of Sears v. … (Dent v. Bennett, 4 Mylne and Craig, 209; Lyon v Home, L. R., 6 Eq., 653; Page v. Horne, 9 Beavan, 570: Coulsen v. Allison, 2 Giffard, 279, and 2 De Gex, Fisher & Jones, 521.) In the case of Page v.

Reed, Donnelle v. Express Employment Professionals

2022 TN WC 43 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 25, 2022

COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT COOKEVILLE DONNELLE REED, ) Docket No. 2021-04-0295 Employee, ) v. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Big Foot Stores LLC v. Franklin Township Assessor

919 N.E.2d 621 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 9, 2009

The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board's final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003). … Hahn, Inc. v. County Assessor for Bernalillo County, 92 N.M. 609 , 592 P.2d 965, 967-69 (1978); Penn Phillips Lands, Inc. v.

Calhoun v. Southeastern Container

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 27, 1996

Brown note of January 20, 1992 and Dr. Brown deposition, p. 7). Plaintiff's treating doctor, Dr. Brown, rendered a specific opinion of her ability to work as follows: Q. All right. Did you form an opinion as to Mrs. … Richards v. Town of Valdese , 92 N.C. App. 222 , 374 S.E.2d 116 (1988), cert. denied , 324 N.C. 337 , 378 S.E.2d 799 (1989). 2.

Jepson Refrigeration Corp. v. Trenton City

15 N.J. Tax 467 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 25, 1996

As set forth in Veeder v. … ; See, e.g., Rutherford Realty Assocs. v.

Boaz v. Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp.

654 N.E.2d 320 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 28, 1995

Harrington v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1988), Ind.Tax, 525 N.E.2d 360, 361 (citing Podgor v. Indiana Univ. (1978), 178 Ind.App. 245 , 381 N.E.2d 1274, 1283 ). … Clarkson v. Dep't of Insurance (1981), Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 203, 208 (citing Taxpayers Lobby of Indiana, Inc. v. Orr (1974), 262 Ind. 92 , 311 N.E.2d 814 ).

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Michelle McCane, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 72

2025 OK AG 12 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 2025

Snyder v. Phelps , 562 U.S. 443, 453 (2011). ¶11 In Connick v. … Conaway v. Smith , 853 F.2d 789, 796 (10th Cir. 1988); Glover v.

Jantzen, Giuseppin Nina & Matthew D. v. Green Township

New Jersey Tax Court · May 31, 2023

R. 4:46-2(c); Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. … V.

Larry G. Jones and Sharon F. Jones v. Jefferson County Assessor

51 N.E.3d 461 · Indiana Tax Court · May 4, 2016

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Kildsig v. Warrick Cnty. Assessor, 998 N.E.2d 764, 765 (Ind. … See, e.g., North Park Cinemas, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 689 N.E.2d 765, 768 (Ind.

City of Newark v. American Realty & Investment Co.

26 N.J. Misc. 238 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 27, 1948

West Shore Railroad Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 92 N. J. L. 332, 335; 104 Atl. Rep. 335 ; Passaic National Bank, &c., Co. v. Eelman, 116 N. J. L. 279, 287; 183 Atl. Rep. 677, 681 ; Jamou *241 neau v. … Jensen v. Woolworth Co., 92 N. J. L. 529; 106 Atl. Rep. 808 ; Donohue v. Campbell, 98 N. J. L. 755; 121 Atl. Rep. 700 .

In re the Estate of Morrell

154 Misc. 356 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 31, 1935

(Hooley v. Gieve, 9 Abb. N. C. 8 , 21 et seq.; Storm v. McGrover, 189 N. Y. 568, 569 ; Newton v. Porter, 69 id. 133, 137; Day v. Both, 18 id. 448, 455; Perry v. Board of Missions, 102 id. 99, 104; Hale v. Omaha Nat. … Y. 415 ; National Bank v. Insurance Co., 104 U. S. 54 ; Cox v. Wills, 49 N. J. Eq. 573, 574; 22 A. 794 ; Andrews v.. Brown, [Tex.] 10 S. W. [2d] 707, 709, and authorities cited.)

Lacy Diversified Industries, Ltd. v. Department of Local Government Finance

799 N.E.2d 1215 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 5, 2003

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board's final determinations when it acts within the seope of its authority. Clark v. … Likewise, mere references to photographs or State Board regulations, without explanation, do not qualify as probative evidence for purposes of grading issues. Heart City Chrysler v.