Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.62s
Grabbe v. Carroll County Assessor
1 N.E.3d 226 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 31, 2013
See, e.g., Inland Steel Co. v. … Hometowne Assocs., L.P. v. Maley, 839 N.E.2d 269, 275 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005).
Cited 6 timesPublishedSwitzerland County Assessor v. Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC
130 N.E.3d 672 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 15, 2019
The Court provided instructions in its opinion for recomputing Belterra’s assessments and remanded the matter to the Indiana Board. Id. at 909. See also Switzerland Cty. Assessor v. … See, e.g., Fackler v. Powell, 839 N.E.2d 165, 167 (Ind. 2005); Skendzel v. Marshall, 330 N.E.2d 747, 749 (Ind. 1975); Lake- O’-The Woods Club v. Martinal, 154 N.E.2d 498, 500 (Ind. 1958); Town of St. John v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedShevtsov v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 2015
Jeff Brown (Brown) and Brandon MacNeil (MacNeil) appeared and testified on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2 was admitted without objection. … Plaintiff appealed that value to the county board of property tax appeals (board) and the board sustained the value. (Id.) In his Complaint to this court, Plaintiff requested a real market value of $4,500. (Id. at 3.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSan Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Collins
61 S.W.2d 84 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 31, 1933
Co. v. U. S. Railroad Labor Board, 261 U. S. 72 , 43 S. Ct. 278 , 67 L. Ed. 536 , has no application. … Co. v.
Cited 18 timesPublished1 Wash. Terr. 339 · Washington Territory · Dec 15, 1872
Brown, 2 Doug., 9 ) and such assent, if given in due form, estops the maker from afterwards denying the altered instrument to be his deed. … Brown, 2 Doug., 9 ; O’Neal vs. Brown, 4 Cranch, 28 ; Reese vs. U. S., 9 Wall., 13 ; U. S. vs. Linn, et al., 1 How., 104 ; and cases cited supra. Contra, 53 Me., 90, 284, and see 8 B. Mon., 3 Grant, 61.
Cited 0 timesPublished3 Wend. 538 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1829
The presumption is as fair that it was on board an American ship, as that it was on board of a British ship; and if so, it was, at the date of the assignment, within the jurisdiction of this country. … board of an American vessel on the high seas is still within the jurisdiction of that country.
Cited 35 timesPublishedGeffert v. Yorktown Independent School Dist.
290 S.W. 1083 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 9, 1927
Dill v. City of Rising Star (Tex. Com. App.) 269 S. W. 769 ; Masterson v. Hedley (Tex. Civ. App.) 265 S. W. 406 ; Yance v. Pleasanton (Tex. Civ. App.) 261 S. W. 457 . … Greer v. Howell, 64 Tex. 688 ; Clayton v. Rehm, 67 Tex. 52 , 2 S. W. 45 ; Dawson v. Ward, 71 Tex. 72 , 9 S. W. 106 .
Cited 34 timesPublishedIdris v. Marion County Assessor
12 N.E.3d 331 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 4, 2014
Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 471 (Ind. … Because the majority of those items were not admitted into evidence during the Indiana Board hearing, the Court may not consider them on appeal. See, e.g., North Park Cinemas, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSouthern Casualty Co. v. Fulkerson
45 S.W.2d 152 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932
In connection with the above, we wish to call attention to the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals at Waco in the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. .Raker et al., 277 S. … Hall Music Co. v. Robertson, 117 Tex. 261 , 1 S.W.(2d) 857 (Com. App. Op. adopted).
Cited 31 timesPublishedMuir Woods Section One Assn., Inc. v. Marion County Assessosr
Indiana Tax Court · Feb 18, 2025
The rehearing process serves a corrective function, allowing the Board an opportunity to rectify errors or omissions of law, fact, or remedy. See, e.g., Griffin v. … Co. v. Clift, 260 U.S. 316, 319 (1922).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMyers v. Ithaca Industries, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 10, 1997
Brown. Dr. Brown released plaintiff on January 24, 1995. Dr. Brown gave plaintiff a 15% permanent partial disability of the right hand. 13. Plaintiff has not returned to work with defendant-employer. … Abels v. Renfro Corp. , 108 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBullins v. Family Dollar Store
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 1, 1996
Hoyle v. Carolina Associated Mills, 122 N.C. App. 462 , 467 , ___ S.E.2d ___ (1996); Carter v. Northern Telecom , I.C. No. 278498, 22 September 1995, aff'd, N.C. App. No. … Priddy v. Blue Bird Cab Co., 9 N.C. App. 291 , 176 S.E.2d 26 (1970). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYorktown Independent School Dist. v. Afflerbach
12 S.W.2d 130 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929
It is not the actual entry in the minutes of the record of the board’s action that gives validity; such record is but evidence. The important consideration-is the act of the board. See Mecom v. … Cummins v. Gaston (Tex. Civ. App.) 109 S. W. 476 , (writ refused) ; Bums v. Dilly, etc., District (Tex. Com. App.) 295 S. W. 1091 ; Crabb v. Celeste, etc., District, 105 Tex. 194 , 146 S. W. 528 , 39 L. R. A. (N.
Cited 20 timesPublishedTexas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Newton
25 S.W.2d 608 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 12, 1930
Gresham v. Harcourt, 93 Tex. 157 , 53 S. W. 1019 ; International & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Sein, 89 Tex. 63 , 33 S. W. 215, 558 . In Moor v. Moor (Tex. Civ. App.) 63 S. … Casey v. Galli, 94 U. S. 673 , 24 L. Ed. 168 ; Daniels v. Tearney, 102 U. S. 415 , 26 L. Ed. 187 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedGeorge v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
2012 Ohio 1250 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 13, 2012
Boyle v. … Clemets v. Heston (1985), 20 Ohio App.3d 132.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYorkshire Towers Co. v. Harpster
134 Misc. 2d 384 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 31, 1986
ANALYSIS The facts of the three cases at bar all parallel the circumstances of the respondent in Two Assoc, v Brown (supra). Acting Supreme Court Justice Helen E. … to the respondents in Park Assoc. v Mesard (supra) and Concourse Vil. v Bilotti (supra).
Cited 4 timesPublishedKellam v. Fountain County Assessor
999 N.E.2d 120 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 10, 2013
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board must demonstrate that the determination is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. Assessor, 938 N.E.2d 311, 313 (Ind. … P'ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1139 (Ind.
Cited 11 timesPublishedZurich General Accident & Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Walker
35 S.W.2d 115 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 4, 1931
Citizens’ Nat’l Bank of Hillsboro v. Graham, 117 Tex. 357 , 4 S.W.(2d) 541 ; Henderson v. U. S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 534 . … Hexter v. Pratt (Tex. Com. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 692 .
Cited 21 timesPublishedSmith v. Cooper Standard Products, Co.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 27, 2006
Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co., 157 N.C. App 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). 2. … Lemly v. Colvard Oil, 157 N.C. App. 99 , 103 , 577 S.E.2d 712 , 715 (2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNova Tube Indiana II LLC v. Clark County Assessor
101 N.E.3d 887 · Indiana Tax Court · May 18, 2018
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Simon DeBartolo Group, LP, 52 N.E.3d 65, 69-70 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2016); Big Foot Stores LLC v. Franklin Twp. Assessor, 919 N.E.2d 621, 625-26 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2009); O’Donnell v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna