Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.62s

  • Grabbe v. Carroll County Assessor

    1 N.E.3d 226 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 31, 2013

    See, e.g., Inland Steel Co. v. … Hometowne Assocs., L.P. v. Maley, 839 N.E.2d 269, 275 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Switzerland County Assessor v. Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC

    130 N.E.3d 672 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 15, 2019

    The Court provided instructions in its opinion for recomputing Belterra’s assessments and remanded the matter to the Indiana Board. Id. at 909. See also Switzerland Cty. Assessor v. … See, e.g., Fackler v. Powell, 839 N.E.2d 165, 167 (Ind. 2005); Skendzel v. Marshall, 330 N.E.2d 747, 749 (Ind. 1975); Lake- O’-The Woods Club v. Martinal, 154 N.E.2d 498, 500 (Ind. 1958); Town of St. John v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shevtsov v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 2015

    Jeff Brown (Brown) and Brandon MacNeil (MacNeil) appeared and testified on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2 was admitted without objection. … Plaintiff appealed that value to the county board of property tax appeals (board) and the board sustained the value. (Id.) In his Complaint to this court, Plaintiff requested a real market value of $4,500. (Id. at 3.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Collins

    61 S.W.2d 84 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 31, 1933

    Co. v. U. S. Railroad Labor Board, 261 U. S. 72 , 43 S. Ct. 278 , 67 L. Ed. 536 , has no application. … Co. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Walla Walla County v. Ping

    1 Wash. Terr. 339 · Washington Territory · Dec 15, 1872

    Brown, 2 Doug., 9 ) and such assent, if given in due form, estops the maker from afterwards denying the altered instrument to be his deed. … Brown, 2 Doug., 9 ; O’Neal vs. Brown, 4 Cranch, 28 ; Reese vs. U. S., 9 Wall., 13 ; U. S. vs. Linn, et al., 1 How., 104 ; and cases cited supra. Contra, 53 Me., 90, 284, and see 8 B. Mon., 3 Grant, 61.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abraham v. Plestoro

    3 Wend. 538 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1829

    The presumption is as fair that it was on board an American ship, as that it was on board of a British ship; and if so, it was, at the date of the assignment, within the jurisdiction of this country. … board of an American vessel on the high seas is still within the jurisdiction of that country.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Geffert v. Yorktown Independent School Dist.

    290 S.W. 1083 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 9, 1927

    Dill v. City of Rising Star (Tex. Com. App.) 269 S. W. 769 ; Masterson v. Hedley (Tex. Civ. App.) 265 S. W. 406 ; Yance v. Pleasanton (Tex. Civ. App.) 261 S. W. 457 . … Greer v. Howell, 64 Tex. 688 ; Clayton v. Rehm, 67 Tex. 52 , 2 S. W. 45 ; Dawson v. Ward, 71 Tex. 72 , 9 S. W. 106 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Idris v. Marion County Assessor

    12 N.E.3d 331 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 4, 2014

    Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 471 (Ind. … Because the majority of those items were not admitted into evidence during the Indiana Board hearing, the Court may not consider them on appeal. See, e.g., North Park Cinemas, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Southern Casualty Co. v. Fulkerson

    45 S.W.2d 152 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

    In connection with the above, we wish to call attention to the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals at Waco in the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. .Raker et al., 277 S. … Hall Music Co. v. Robertson, 117 Tex. 261 , 1 S.W.(2d) 857 (Com. App. Op. adopted).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Muir Woods Section One Assn., Inc. v. Marion County Assessosr

    Indiana Tax Court · Feb 18, 2025

    The rehearing process serves a corrective function, allowing the Board an opportunity to rectify errors or omissions of law, fact, or remedy. See, e.g., Griffin v. … Co. v. Clift, 260 U.S. 316, 319 (1922).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Ithaca Industries, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 10, 1997

    Brown. Dr. Brown released plaintiff on January 24, 1995. Dr. Brown gave plaintiff a 15% permanent partial disability of the right hand. 13. Plaintiff has not returned to work with defendant-employer. … Abels v. Renfro Corp. , 108 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bullins v. Family Dollar Store

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 1, 1996

    Hoyle v. Carolina Associated Mills, 122 N.C. App. 462 , 467 , ___ S.E.2d ___ (1996); Carter v. Northern Telecom , I.C. No. 278498, 22 September 1995, aff'd, N.C. App. No. … Priddy v. Blue Bird Cab Co., 9 N.C. App. 291 , 176 S.E.2d 26 (1970). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yorktown Independent School Dist. v. Afflerbach

    12 S.W.2d 130 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929

    It is not the actual entry in the minutes of the record of the board’s action that gives validity; such record is but evidence. The important consideration-is the act of the board. See Mecom v. … Cummins v. Gaston (Tex. Civ. App.) 109 S. W. 476 , (writ refused) ; Bums v. Dilly, etc., District (Tex. Com. App.) 295 S. W. 1091 ; Crabb v. Celeste, etc., District, 105 Tex. 194 , 146 S. W. 528 , 39 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Newton

    25 S.W.2d 608 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 12, 1930

    Gresham v. Harcourt, 93 Tex. 157 , 53 S. W. 1019 ; International & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Sein, 89 Tex. 63 , 33 S. W. 215, 558 . In Moor v. Moor (Tex. Civ. App.) 63 S. … Casey v. Galli, 94 U. S. 673 , 24 L. Ed. 168 ; Daniels v. Tearney, 102 U. S. 415 , 26 L. Ed. 187 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • George v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

    2012 Ohio 1250 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 13, 2012

    Boyle v. … Clemets v. Heston (1985), 20 Ohio App.3d 132.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yorkshire Towers Co. v. Harpster

    134 Misc. 2d 384 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 31, 1986

    ANALYSIS The facts of the three cases at bar all parallel the circumstances of the respondent in Two Assoc, v Brown (supra). Acting Supreme Court Justice Helen E. … to the respondents in Park Assoc. v Mesard (supra) and Concourse Vil. v Bilotti (supra).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kellam v. Fountain County Assessor

    999 N.E.2d 120 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 10, 2013

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board must demonstrate that the determination is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. Assessor, 938 N.E.2d 311, 313 (Ind. … P'ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1139 (Ind.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Zurich General Accident & Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Walker

    35 S.W.2d 115 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 4, 1931

    Citizens’ Nat’l Bank of Hillsboro v. Graham, 117 Tex. 357 , 4 S.W.(2d) 541 ; Henderson v. U. S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 534 . … Hexter v. Pratt (Tex. Com. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 692 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Cooper Standard Products, Co.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 27, 2006

    Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co., 157 N.C. App 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). 2. … Lemly v. Colvard Oil, 157 N.C. App. 99 , 103 , 577 S.E.2d 712 , 715 (2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nova Tube Indiana II LLC v. Clark County Assessor

    101 N.E.3d 887 · Indiana Tax Court · May 18, 2018

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Simon DeBartolo Group, LP, 52 N.E.3d 65, 69-70 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2016); Big Foot Stores LLC v. Franklin Twp. Assessor, 919 N.E.2d 621, 625-26 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2009); O’Donnell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.